What happened to C&C Generals 2? I remember to was hyped

>>382497378
>EA

>>382497378
>EA

File: 1495378828328.jpg (45KB, 373x332px)

45KB, 373x332px

>>382497378
thanks for the reminder anon

>>382497378
C&C4 flopped, Generals 2 was supposed to be the rebound, then it went F2P which led to EA eventually deciding to just mercy kill it.

File: 23t.jpg (102KB, 756x553px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 756x553px

>>382497378

>EA

File: ss+(2015-11-23+at+09.49.36).jpg (43KB, 563x508px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 563x508px

Went f2p and played nothing like C&C.
It was for the best to be canned.

>>382498743
Im a phonefag, whats this?

>>382498489
>mercy kill
EA is the entire reason it flopped.

How is EA so capable of ruining games and series, which have already been built for them?

I mean really, the game comes with a fanbase, comes with several games with which to study for material and design, maybe comes with some original devs as well.

And they have fucked it up, every single time.
Bullfrog, Maxis, Pandemic, we all know that list.

But the question remains: how is EA so competent at being absolutely incompetent?

>>382497378
There is a really good article somewhere where a "reporter" interviewed a lot of key figures from the Generals 2 team.