>can't wait to finish single player in 20 hours then jump to online mode and grind cash for hundreds of hours
People are actually exited about this?
>>382481878
>Assuming the game will be the exact same as the first with no improvements or changes whatsoever
t. angry pc kike
>>382481878
I am excited about this. Not PREORDER excited, but like Xmas sale, or a month or 3 later excited.
>>382481878
i found the online in RDR more fun than GTAIV and GTAV online to be honest
>>382482121
>He thinks Kike$tar won't make the online a boring grindfest where no fun is allowed and then fuck off with the single player.
People are excited about online RDR?
The first game's online was shit. It was exactly like GTAIV's after the first 2 weeks:
Every game was just a bunch of kids spawning, using auto aim to lock onto the nearest person and shooting them with a pistol until one of them died. Respawn, repeat.
>>382481878
I like westerns
This is one of the few game set in the old west.
The first one also happens to be one of the best games I have ever played.
Not even excited a little.
/v/ has broken me.
>>382482234
>Angry about rockstar and take twos shitty decisions
>>382482949
Its weird but i'm really hyped even though i hated the shit rockstar pulled with GTA5
If this game sucks, i will quit gaming and /v/
So how are they gonna manage the shitty grindfest for this shit? Like I can get it in GTA, you can pass it off as 2deep4u "oh it's satire/consumerist bullshit/etc," but what are we gonna do in Red Dead? Spend $30 westernbux on a big ass stable that we have to buy like 40 horses that cost $20 each or some shit? Get like 2 cents for each mission? I can't see it being anything other than a special kind of retarded.
>>382482793
>The first game's online was THE shit
ftfy
It was really fucking good, but when it got fucked, R* was too fucking lazy to fix it. Still fucked to this day.