Let's ignore all the /pol/ shit that doesn't belong

I wanna play as a cop and/or have a corrupt cop character story

>>382059247
>Gang territory
>Factions

>>382059247
More missions.

>>382059247
>Better ragdoll physics
>More "powerful" feeling weapons
>Better gun sound effects
>Can only carry two rifles at a time, two or three handguns
>Holstered weapons
>Strapped rifles that hang off the player character
>Survival mechanics (sleeping, eating, shitting, etc.)

>>382059860
>more sensitive cops who will arrest you for carrying a gun, running red lights, speeding, etc.

I know it'll never happen, but this is "fun" to me. Even having it be optional would be acceptable, but I really think Rockstar and other developers underestimate their fanbases.

>>382059860
>wounding
>executions
>better hand-to-hand combat

>>382059860
>Can only carry two rifles at a time, two or three handguns
No, this has been a thing in shooters for long enough. That adds nothing to the game. Everything else is fine, and maybe the strapped rifles could be quick-select weapons to keep in a bit of the limited carry idea.

>>382060494
It adds immersion. Don't you want to get lost in the idea that you're a real life gangster? Also it might be fun to have to scramble for weapons if need be.

Set it in 3 cities since it won't be out for another 4 years, Houston, Miami, and Chicago.

Abandon the 'HD Universe' and start over yet again with a new concept.

The entire North American Continent in 3D-Universe map scale. 'HD-Toon'/'pulp comic' art style (eg. TF2 concept art/portraits, Dishonored 1). Fully destructible environments, but it takes realistic force (eg. crashing a plane into a high-rise won't knock it over, but you could sneak in and rig key structural areas with explosives to bring it down). Exclusively or primarily first-person view.

Either all-in on being an MMO, or greatly reduced multiplayer focus. Either one, just so long as they decide from the start, because GTAO is trash.

>>382059247
>lets ignore the /pol/ shit
>posts "WE" all caps in the same sentence
I had a good kek

Same characters as V but set in San Fierro and Las Venturas, I want to rob a Casino with the lads

Of course they'll just play it safe and do Vice City again

>>382059380
That would be cool

>>382060781
Just put a restriction on yourself, I understand how having a limit could be nice in the controlled environment of a mission but half the fun in GTA is having a shootout in free-roam.

Better continuity. I hate it when I'm playing a mission and in the cutscene the character says "good morning" in the middle of the night, or that Trevor arrived in town "a couple days ago" when he literally just arrived that day. Either avoid it, or change it, I don't know.

>>382061072
Again, there could be a "Hardcore Mode" like in FO4 and NV.

>>382061035
I don't want to ever have to deal with that 3 protagonist shit again, but I also don't think there's a whole lot they can do with another Vice City.
>>382061140
Hardcore mode would be fine, there's nothing wrong with more options.

>>382059247
I agree with everything but

>useable gas stations
>immersive shit like sitting down, enforced traffic laws

I recently played Mafia 2 and while all of those things were a refreshing change of pace. I don't want to have to smash on the fucking breaks or speed limiter every time I drive past a cop hoping he doesn't clock me for speeding. It's immersive but fucking annoying as fuck and I see why it's never been in any GTA, because it would just be annoying as fuck. Look at how massive San Andreas was, now imagine if you had to follow traffic laws in that. A 30 minute mission now takes like an hour and a half because you have to obey traffic laws or fucking lose the cops every time you go speeding by them.

When I was younger I wanted shit like that but as I got older I just realized it'd be more of a nuisance than anything else.

I also don't think they could make a female protagonist work and I wouldn't want to see 70s LC either. In fact I want a completely different city never done before, I'm sure it's too late for that as they've probably been laying the ground work for the next game already.

THE REAL QUESTION WE NEED TO BE ASKING OURSELVES IS WILL WE EVEN GET THE NEXT GTA THIS GEN? I MEAN TECHNICALLY GTA V DROPPED LAST GEN ON PS3/XBOX 360, BUT THE "REAL" GAME CAME TO CURRENT GEN. SO WILL WE GET GTA VI THIS GEN AND HAVE IT PORTED TO NEXT-GEN AGAIN OR WILL THEY JUST WAIT UNTIL NEXT GEN, WHICH WOULD PROBABLY BE AROUND 2020-2021.

>>382061140
I also don't want inexplicable time skips at the beginning missions like in V. Was very "meh", and broke immersion. At least have the character sleep in his car or something.

I also don't want cars to repair/park themselves. Give me a reason to use Pay N Sprays and actually use my millions of dollars on practical things.

>>382061392
>don't want inexplicable time skips at the beginning missions like in V

Yeah sure it broke immersion but it was convient. I'd rather have time skips than have to go ALL THE WAY FUCKING BACK TO MY SAFEHOUSE and save the game 3-5 times just because the mission wants me to start it at exactl 8PM-4AM. That shit was annoying as fuck in previous GTAs.

>>382061331
why the hell do people want to obey trafic laws in GTA, for what reason, it would be fun for 2 minutes and get booring after u get 2 stars for the 10th time for running a red light

>>382059247
>CJ, The Best Guy

less niggers

File: 1497799991317.png (133KB, 319x272px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 319x272px

>>382059982
>MORE sensitive cops
yeah no. I can recall several times when I got arrested for checking my phone near a cop

>>382059247
>GTA IV
>Realistic Driving
Yeah I sure love when I drive my car and it dips five feet to the ground when I make a 5 mph turn

>>382061774
If anything, the star system should be more lax. I had more fun driving like a maniac in Sleeping Dogs than anything I did in GTA5.

>>382061774
I don't know. Again like I said, I thought it'd be fun when I was a kid, but now that I'm older I know it'd just be annoying.

>>382062151
>tfw you realize the driving is so shit in Sleeping Dogs because your character is Asian

Or at least that's what I tell myself. I don't have an excuse for why the driving is fucking cancer in Watch_Dogs though.

>>382059247
Who am I kidding, if they remake the game with a new look I am still gonna buy it because its fucking gta. They would need to fuck up pretty hard to not get a sale.

Basically San Andreas but with modern technology. I liked the upgradable skills and customization that V was lacking.
Also I want it to be set in Modern Vice City.
And I want there to be an 80s station dj'd by Ray Liotta
>>382061774
Immersion.
But it's a dumb idea as a concrete Mechanic. But a mode that allows you to autisitcally live in the world could be a fun addition. Just if only for the novelty. Like one of those survival modes in an RPG.
You need to eat, sleep, you need to go to the hospital/find a medkit to heal rather than sleep it off. Being shot is you get hit twice with a pistol and you're done, but so does everyone else. Obey traffic. You can't get into a head on collision and be fine.
Actually that's all too much work for something most people will probably play for like an hour.

ITT a laundry list of cool things that will never happen because they don't facilitate the cash shop.

>>382059247
basically a gta IV remake

>>382062746
LC is being ported to GTAO

>>382059247
>VR

gotta have muh gimmicks

>>382062475
>an 80s station dj'd by Ray Liotta
Didn't know how much I wanted this until now

>>382061331
A female protagonist could work if they make her as fucked up and somewhat retarded as every male protag, which in the current climate nobody will do.

It's a shame because playing a busted up hooker taking over her dead client's business could be pretty cool

>>382063131
>female protagonist
>you can prostitute yourself
Imagine the shitstorm.

>>382063204
SJWs like sex workers. They won't be upset about it

>>382063540
You can also kill your clients and take their money while you're at it. Rockstar please this is my fetish do it.

File: mexico-guns0415_04-15-2009_3GFRT2H_t400.jpg?fd5af0684d698ce74dd4392bafb4f89a6dc66ee3.jpg (40KB, 400x517px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x517px

>>382063131
>Play as hooker with ties to a relatively high ranking organized crime member. He's your client/lover in a "complicated" relationship. He's murdered by a different gang but it's all put on you. You're run out of town by both your lover's people and their rivals. The game is you amassing connections and resources to return home. Three separate endings, you can side with your lover's old gang, the people who killed him, or everybody and get reign over the town. The different options have different end game perks.

>>382063131
I feel like you severely underestimate Rockstar. If they made a chick protag, she'll probably be the best female video game character to ever exist, because R* has a very unique way of writing stories where they shit on right-wing views (the entire series is satirising conservative American values) while making very endearing characters who live by those values. The games are more leftist than people might think, it's just expressed more by making fun of the right than it is by promoting the left, the latter of which most people on /v/ hate. Basically, it appeals to everyone in the smartest way possible.

>>382062891
source: your ass

>>382059247
>From the next GTA
I want a game that doesn't have shark cards.

Rival characters with unique playthroughs that add to the other in retrospect.

>>382059247
They need to make better sounding guns because the ones in GTA V are complete garbage

>>382063131
>busted up hooker taking over her dead client's business could be pretty cool

But extremely unrealistic. It'd be the exact opposite of what you'd claim you want in the OP, assuming you're the OP of this thread.

>hooker
>dumb enough to let some dude pimp you out
>dick sucking mini-games
>first tutorial missions is remembering how to shoot up heroin
>going with your fellow hooker friend to score some crack and then fighting him off because he tries to rape your friend
>fighting your client-boyfriend when he tries to beat you or some shit

Why do all that when I could just watch an episode of cops or The Wire? Moreso the shitstorm from feminists would probably have R* apologizing on national TV like that faggot cuck Boogie, so yeah I don't think that would work. Feminists would literally start up a Civil War over that shit.

>>382067213
The only problem I see with a hooker protagonist is how she'll get combat experience.

All GTA protags are either ex-military or gangsters, so it makes sense that they can use a wide range of weapons from the get go. Being a hooker doesn't give someone that kind of experience.

I have below zero hype for the next gta because it's so obviously going to be geared towards gta:online even more so than V was. Rockstar only cares for money.

>>382068242
Maybe she was in one of those crazy survivalist families, left for the city, and ended up hooking to pay the bills.

>secret missions
>secret easter eggs
>SECRETS
>cheat codes

>>382068242
It's america. Just make them a gun nut.

I want to play as a dog with a gun.

I want the entire game to have a map of the entire United States and you can travel to anywhere you want.

All while being a dog with a gun.
That can fly.

>>382062475

I dunno, I ended up playing Fallout 4 and having a lot more fun with it once they amped up the survival mode.

>>382063131
I'd wanna play as an out of shape, 40 something, cigar smoking Mafia chick.

>>382064151
It's very obviously leftist.

I'd rather they shit on liberals more, desu. At least in V they did a bit more with sanctimonious Hollywood liberals like Raging Impotence or whatever his name was.

>>382059247
>enforced traffic laws
hell no
But I want hijackable, derailable trains back

>>382067213
Why the fuck would R* write their character like that? Are you dumb? lol. Obviously they'd write the character with tact and wouldn't include such lowbrow activities because, I don't know, they never make their protagonists just a "typical" example of something.

I hate referring to logical fallacies but this couldn't be more blatant of a strawman. But that's right. Feminists are coming to fuck your dad and ruin your life, Anon.

>>382070003
They do shit on liberals tho. I wish I could remember because I had this discussion ages ago, but there's a number of examples where they make fun of idpol and hipster brand social justice, as well as general moral ego stroking. In shit as obvious as characters or as subtle as radio ads.

>>382070036
Up until IV all the protags were fairly typical stereotypes.

>>382059247
>hundreds of buildings
>can only enter a few shops

No interiors, no buy.

>>382070197
Hell, I'd even include IV. And V to an extent, as well.

Cliches done on purpose in a game like this work well.

File: 2CAB125600000578-3245907-image-a-1_1442998784061.jpg (104KB, 634x707px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 634x707px

>>382068242
You're overthinking it.
Several GTA characters were low tier gangbangers and errand boys who by the end were operating military grade vehicles.
A hooker in deep with criminals learning how to use a gun or two efficiently isn't that crazy.
>>382069709
I just think there might be a bit too many factors if you go too far, plus it's a different kind of game. Fallout already has that system. Whereas if you need to eat in GTA it's less "I have to ration this to last me til' I find the next food source" and more "Fuck it's been 20 minutes, I need to stop what I'm doing and drive to a fucking burger shot and go through the same shitty dialogue" and that's just if they only get as immersive as simple things like sleep and food. If they really go as far as you take damage for car crashes, nobody would want to do anything because cops would swarm you, you'd inevitably crash and then get shot once and die.
Unless survival mode has a more proportionate cop response system where they don't have gps with your exact location and you can actually evade police by staying out of sight/leaving the scene before they ever arrive.
>>382070273
I mean the game is just cliches in a fun package.

>>382070531
Yeah, but then you could git gud and have some seriously intense car chases and gun battles.

Either that or they go full arcade again.

>>382070197
No way. They were characters based on archetypes who go above and beyond the tropes of their image. R* would make their hooker protagonist stand out without degrading her for degradation's sake. Trevor is kind of similar in that he's a degenerate and they had him doing degenerate shit, but it was all complementary to his strengths as a person/character (loyalty, diligence, ambition). A Hooker protag would do some yuck stuff but they would make sure she remained a likeable character

>>382059247
more activities like go karts
interactive enviroment
you can choose you figthing style like SR2

Let's get serious, if they made a female protagonist it would be a feminist

File: 72-new-orleans-gear-patrol-lead-full.jpg (315KB, 970x650px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 970x650px

How would a GTA game set in New Orleans play out? I know that realistically R* would probably pick Las Venturas as the location for the next game, but I can dream.

>>382059247
To answer the question:
>Driving that doesn't feel completely slippery
>More activities indoors
>Guns that feel powerful
>If going the multiple protag route, excellent and previously unexplored character dynamics (i.e. protags from rival groups)
>Better load times
>Optional heists
>Heists with multiple layers of decision making
>Co-op comapaign if going the multiple protag route
>Incentive to completing side missions

>>382071302
Have you played a R* game? She wouldn't be a feminist but she wouldn't be /Pol/ either. She'd be some sort of relatable middleground chaotic neutral egalitarian centrist. they'd probably include a feminist supporting character who's obnoxious and loud and have missions where women consistently fuck you over

>>382059247
What does /pol/ even have to do with this?

>>382071302
R* is a company that thrives on controversy. If anything, a feminist female protagonist would be a very bad business move for them

>>382071778
Making a female protagonist in the CURRENT YEAR requires her to be a stronk womyn who needs no man

>>382072050
... that's not feminist you brain dead bumfuck

>>382072131
Feminism is muh stronk independent womyn fighting the patriarchy and rape culture

>>382070036
>being this retarded

You couldn't be more wrong. Please tell me how you write a believable GTA story around a hooker. Please tell me how I'm supposed to believe some whore that's dumb enough to allow herself to be controlled and pimp'd would be able to pull off half the shit any of the protagonists have done in the last 4 games.

It would be either extremely bland or extremely fucking outlandish, which R* themselves have strayed away from in the last 2 games when you compare the outlandish shit in Vice City and moreso San Andreas compared to IV and V. A hooker/female protag just wouldn't work point blank.

>>382072427
For one, they don't have to be a hooker. They could be a self employed escort. It's still sexually whorish but it's uncommon enough to warrant them being a protagonist. And dude it's R*, you are kidding yourself if you think that they're still not next level outlandish, it's just done with more nuance and sentimental writing to help engage you.

They could so easily make it an escort chick who resorts to other petty crime on the side but ends up receiving an opportunity when she receives attention because she fucks over a client or some shit. Maybe the client goes too far and she snaps and loses it and kills him. She's about to get booked by cops but on the way to the cop Shop, she gets freed by some thugs. Turns out the client she killed was the enemy of some local gang leader or something and he wanted to repay the favour and get you into the network of underground crime. I don't know, something like that.

>No stupid gimmicks like abilities and character switching.
>No more aimbot and cover system
>>These only reduce player input and make gameplay cheaper and dull (especially when combined)
>Redirect the effort from the above into improving police AI
>If non-regenerating health is going to stay (or slight regeneration as in V) then police engagements need to lose the swarm/instantly respawning-drone-like feel entirely.
>Go back to Gta 4's style/settings of character control. V's is not as smooth
>Put thought into the plot and characters so it's actually good like Gta4
>>If that's not possible then just treat it the same as in Gta 3
>Don't mindlessly downgrade random aspects of the game (if you haven't noticed these in Gta V you're deluding yourself)
>No more blatant artificial difficulty (infinite, reckless cops that path to even without los, losing steering control when touched by a police car)
>Bring back ability to crouch
>Remove the massive amount of bounce and recoil in first person that is nonexistent in third person and renders first person useless
>>Fov slider for first person
>Actual modding support with actual Rockstar tools
>Ability to make private games instead of what GTAO is
>Dying should revert to save (load from safehouse) or restart if you've abstained from saving. Being arrested should probably result in the same
>>Bonus mode: disable spamming of the safe house to prevent saving after every mission
>>Remove ability to instantly retry missions after failing
>Remove the on-a-rail, interactive movie feel V and 4 had (4 to a lesser degree)
>>A better way of saying above might be less over-scripting
>Characters that aren't ridiculously stupid, wacky, and over eccentric for the sake of appealing to underage shitters
>Tone down the friend activities
>Revamp heists to be less linear, larger, and more rewarding
>Cameos of previous characters
>a tank
>Remove or significantly tone down collectibles
>Good radio (seriously V's had nothing positive about it)

>>382072969
It could be a escort and it would still be just as stupid of an idea. I don't know what your obsession with escorts/hookers are or why you're trying to push your shitty fetish onto games but it's not going to happen. It's just a dumb idea.

I never said R* isn't outlandish, but they've toned down in the recent games. Compare the heists and gunfights of GTA V or even GTA IV, to half of the shit in San Andreas and it's not even close to outlandish. And this isn't even bringing up the outlandish shit we get in games like Just Cause or Saints Row.

A female protag could probably work if she was a gangbanger or hitman or some shit. But a glorfieid pornstar? That shit is just fucking retarded.

>>382072427
you're trying rewlly hard to make something very basic seem impossible... it's just a game senpai, they can do anything especially if it's rocketstar

>>382072427
Are you implying most the characters in gta aren't idiots who allow themselves to get taken advantage of?
>Strayed away from the outlandish

>Assaults a well known celebrity with evidence of the assault on tape.
>Murder several high profile individuals like two billionaires and a celebrity FBI agent
>Goes to war with a Private military and wins with three guys
>Franklin talks to dogs
>Trevor's everything

File: 1442024967082.jpg (52KB, 640x420px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x420px

>Instead of 3 criminals:
Cop
An in between character who plays both sides, maybe some mayor or president

>More wildlife
>Terrorist attacks
>Natural disasters (floods, earthquakes)
>Cops with a brain, not just KoS
>Less supercars
>No sharkcards

>>382073571
>Some mayor or President
what?

>>382073527
Aside from 3 guys single-handedly taking on a private military, you're telling me those things take more suspending of belief than some random camgirl magically becoming some crazy psycho gun-wielding lunatic drug-kingpin? Could you stop thinking with your dick for one fucking second you retard?

>>382073324
I honestly don't care what she is, I'm just saying that it would be fine if she was a hooker. you're the one who's taking this really grand stance that the character would be the worst thing in existence if she was a whore. As if the other protags weren't degenerates as well ? it's a refreshing characteristic and a perfect way to stick it to both liberals and conservatives. Do you not want to play as a girl that badly?
or did a hooker break your heart or something. I literally gave you a low-key, reasonable prologue for a protag like that and you're still so antsy

Just stick with one protagonist. They were trying too hard to give the same feel the DLC stuff did. It didn't work because the DLC characters don't interact with the other characters. Also Micheal had more focus, while Franklin felt like he was suppose to be the blank slate.

>>382073717
>some random camgirl

What the fuck? why do you keep making this shit up. People are giving you proper examples of how it could work in "lore" but you're just ignoring them because of some deep contempt for sluts? I can't believe people are arguing realism In the fucking GTA franchise of all fucking franchises.

>>382073728
>ad hominems

I was waiting for when you'd inevitable start tossing those around. Like I said, she could easily be an assassin or even a gangbanger, but please tell me how many hookers you know of that became guntoting psycho kingpins and took over some criminal empire? I have nothing against female protags but you're literally sitting here saying that a hooker could do any of those things would just completely unrealistic, which is hilarious when like 90% of the posts in this thread is MUH IMMERSION MUH REALISM.

>>382073645
Not a character you spend 10s of hours on but who is more story and makes important decisions that influence massive change

File: welp.png (471KB, 986x715px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 986x715px

>>382059247
>Sharkcards
>Online only
>no singleplayer campaign
>create a character.
You know its going to happen just look at GTA Online, it was the best thing to ever happen to Rockstar. And they would be stupid to not double down on that shit.

GTA will never be the same now that Leslie left Rockstar

File: 363B0EF100000578-3688554-image-a-44_1468424873346.jpg (63KB, 634x537px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 634x537px

>>382073717
Yes a guy talking to dogs like it's fucking Lassie is goofy.
Trevor was wacky as fuck 90% of the time.
Murdering not!Facebook guy and a guy with enough clout to make the FBI his bitch with really no repercussions is out there.
More out there then a whore knowing how to use a gun.
Especially if she's Mexican.
This is a Necrophiliac Cannibal Hit woman for a Drug cartel.

BRING BACK THE DRUG DEALING FROM CHINATOWN WARS RRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Should I get GTAV?
I don't have it, obvs, and I've never played a GTA game. I played watch dogs but thought the main character was an asshole. Plus, you couldn't keep and customize a car, that's bullshit. I guess it made sense but it was still gay.
I REALLY want to race cars online or in a really well made single player.
The last real racing game I played was Gran Turismo: A spec.
That game was amazing but there doesn't seem to be anything like it that I can play on my Quadra.
Should I get wipeout or GTAV for racing and overall good times?

>>382073976
This definitely goes beyond realism. There has to be another reason why you're so bizarrely passionate about hating this idea.

No one can be so fucking dumb that they'd disregard a GTA protagonist because "they didn't know of any", Holy fuck. Please tell me you have another reason, dude, I'm begging you. to look at any GTA game and think "yeah this is totally realistic" is so beyond my comprehension right now. the series is literally based on glorifying the worst of America in both satire and genuinity. "crime, drug addiction, sex, guns, and violence, with all the benefits and none of the consequences". that's GTA. it's schtick. it's gimmick. if you think a depressed upper class cuck, a young black street hoodlum and a degenerate piece of trash addict can achieve criminal greatness in a gta game but a hooker can't, then you have no fucking idea what the games are about, dude.

File: ReallyMakesYaThink.gif (765KB, 504x504px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 504x504px

>>382059247
>Realistic Driving
Honestly I'd much rather it be more like 4 than 5. 5 feels like you're on ice and I refuse to drive anything but motorcycles now.
>70's New York
Probably the only way I'd want them to do New York again. Otherwise I wish they'd choose something new
>Traffics Laws enforced
This sounds neat in concept but would get really annoying really fast. This is a game at the end of the day
>VR
meme
>Run the City
Might be a bit much honestly, rather some kind of self realization or ''coming to''
>Linearity
and then you go on to say that you want non-linear
>Less Loading
I mean there's not much they can really do about it. Faster loading would be nice, but that also kinda sides on hardware a bit.


You got a lot of the shit I would probably want. They only things I can really think of are:
>Car insurance in Story
>Focus more on Single Player (I know Online is their cash cow. I've never spent any money on it, though, and would gladly buy a single player dlc)
>More buildings to go into (you sort of got this) and more shit to do in buildings.
>Functioning Stock Market in Online

>>382074293
jesus

>>382073976
The underdog beating out all the crime leaders is pretty much what always happens in the games though. You always start off as a pathetic nobody.

File: slide-04.jpg (487KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1600x1600px

What city do you want to see in GTA but will probably never happen?

For me, it's Portland. Pic unrelated

>>382075421
I'm a bit biased but I'd really like to see Detroit/Metro area. They could even do a Level in the UP, maybe incorporate the seasons. I think it would be pretty interesting, maybe it would be too boring though.

>>382075421
New Orleans

less pigskins