QUESTION: A game that has been in development for multiple years and is delayed multiple time surely means it will be good when it's released right?
>>381741861
depends on why it was delayed
sure
just look at duke nukem forever
Duke Nukem
Nukem Duke
no the reason for delay determines the quality
if it was delayed because of funds it will be bad
if it was delayed because of staff it will be bad
if it was delayed because of dub/subbing issues it will be good
if it was delayed because of gameplay overhaul it will be good
if it was delayed because of shifts in publishing it will be good
Lllllllet's go!
>>381741861
>>381741956
>>381741974
>>381742008
>Well, you're wrong
>any game that becomes development hell will become hell for consumers and publishers in the long run
>anyways, LEEEEET'S GOOOOOOO
>>381741861
Every episode is on YouTube
>>381741861
>forgot the "show of hands, now" part
fucking kys
>>381742105
>if it was delayed because of shifts in publishing it will be good
The first-gen GBA Rareware titles being eventually published THQ suggest differently
DOES THIS HELMET MAKE ME LOOK FAT?
>>381742638
Right you are
>>381744428
that's pretty cool
>>381743097
obviously there will be discrepancies