So why did they decide to try and go back to their roots when

>>381698291
Because of BF1 and people already complaining that futuristic shooters are getting boring.

because muh boots on duh ground

File: snake 6.jpg (91KB, 428x428px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 428x428px

>>381698291
>Shooting black female nazis is going back to its roots

God I had such I hopes for this game

>>381699797
>Black female nazis
What? I don't remember this from the trailer.

File: codwwii.png (2MB, 1649x960px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1649x960px

They sure didn't try very hard.

>>381699517
>people already complaining that futuristic shooters are getting boring.
Yeah but are their complaints showing in their prophet margins?

File: 1496564223140.jpg (14KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x300px

iirc call of duty has been selling less and less since black ops 2

>>381699517
>because of BF1
Yeah because they didn't start planning and development on this game until BF1's announcement last year. Fucking retard. It was the whiners who didn't like the advanced movement in Advanced Warfare that made them go back.

>>381700210
>>381700210
"Can use the same guns"
Like you can pick them up form dead enemy solders?

File: sadgerman.png (668KB, 933x718px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 933x718px

>>381700117
In the multiplayer you can customize your character to be whatever you want, so if you want to be a black female who wears the SS pea dot camo on the German team, go right ahead.

File: call-of-duty-world-at-war-swamp-of-the-dead.jpg (961KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

961KB, 1920x1080px

>>381700210
>you can use whatever weapons in a multiplayer WW2 shooter
WOW whoda thunk it? Totally unheard of

>>381700758
>How to announce to everyone you're underage: the post

>>381702017
I KNOW I nostalgia so hard when I see that game Xdd
Neck yourself retard

>Implying first call of duty werent generic Hollywood garbage

Just remind you hpw they ripped off Enemy at the Gates