Now that you've seen extended gameplay, will you still be

>>381696178
Maybe on a sale.

Is this game STILL not out yet?

>>381696178
This is coming out for the Switch too, right?
I might get it if so, from what I've seen it'd take some real impressive shit for me to get on board

Depends if the girl gets naked or not

I want to fuck her.

>>381696178
Fuck no if anything I'm even more put off by the game

>>381696178
How can I buy a game that will never be released?

Looks better than Yooka-Laylee, so probably.

>PC exclusive
Fuck no. Why would I buy a platformer on PC with a Switch and a PS4?

It's a lazy shitty business practice

>>381696309
Fuck man, they started and completed development on Yooka Laylee in the time they've spent making a Shat in Time.

>>381696897
They want to release it on the Switch
They couldn't get devkits

>>381696975
looks good i like it

>>381697047
And boy does it show.

>>381696975
Go from
>Shitty prototype blocked-out level
>Appealing and warm looking style
>Somewhere in the middle of the two
Why did they feel the need to make worse assets after they made perfectly fine ones?

>>381697213
Yeah, it YL seems to be more polished and have more focused with a managed much better than Hat in Time. I mean, that is if this game even manages to come out.

File: 1481607980592.jpg (115KB, 509x501px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 509x501px

>>381697213
this

File: 1481668161525.jpg (104KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1680x1050px

>>381697471
>it YL seems to be more polished and have more focused with a managed much better than Hat in Time

>>381696178
It still looks like it's gonna take another 3 years.

The final build looks much better and I like the Mario Sunshine vibe.

Which game is this? The one that was supposed to come out five years ago or the other one that was supposed to come out five years ago?

>>381696178

NO. I'll just do porn of the girl.

>>381697620
The game looks mediocre as fuck. It is just another budget 3D platforming with trinkets to collect.

I get it, you guys want to fap to the character. That doesn't mean the game will be good, nor is good.

>>381697460
>blurry and poor quality is "appealing and warm"

>>381697620
The game is running off of Unreal and it looks worse graphically. The quality doesn't reflect five years worth of work. More like two.

>>381698420
Do not fap to Hatkid, she is adorable and pure.

>>381698692
>what is a low quality screenshot
you're just pretending to be retarded... r-right?

>>381697460
Console optimizing.

File: 1241241242.gif (35KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 150x150px

>>381696178
>Slag
Hell no

>>381696975
It's like their art director got cancer in the head.

Look at the wooden planks, they're different style from the ones on wooden boxes have. The overall style of the game looks like they had a few different art directors or everyone did whatever they wanted and now it looks bad. Sorry.

>>381701928
It's only one guy with zero past experience.

>>381702204
>>381701928
I should clarify, I'm trying to use that to explain why everything looks shit. Not to defend it. Dude has no idea what he's doing and tried to jump on the Rare Revival hype train that was going on at the time.

more gameplay came out or something?