redpill me once and for all against AMD and Intel shills. Will

>>381666065
>>>/g/
Intel i7-7700K is better because Ryzen can't touch it's single-threaded power, but can keep up with a fucking eight-core Ryzen 1700 in multithreaded tasks because it clocks so damn high.

>>381666065
>redpill me once
your gay and should kill yourself mainly for just how fucking lame of gay you are. Since you aint even a decent gay. Your one of those lame as faggy gay who are just to damn gay for thier own good. So go make a donation at a sperm bank, since gays are supposedly on average more intelligent that non gays so you can at least potentially do something non shit with your life in potentially making a smart offspring through artificial insemination, and off your self for your sake and the good of man kind.

>>381666197
then why people recommend buying Ryzen

>>381666657
Because they're either legitimate AMD shills, hate Intel for some obscure reason, or parrot what the other two say.

Intel is the single best choice for a gaming PC bar none. Ryzen is a distant second, and only when everything works in its favor (which rarely happens thanks to how rushed AM4 was).

File: 1497503866642.jpg (85KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 633x758px

>>381666904
mmm... why is Intel pushing on 7700K users to not OC for temps.

Also what is the deal with Vega. is it a future fail?

>>381667218
>why is Intel pushing on 7700K users to not OC for temps.
That's misinformation, some 7700K and 7600Ks were reporting thermal spikes, to which Intel replied by saying not all chips will hit higher frequencies without thermal compromise, so don't overclock if you're worried about temperatures.
>Also what is the deal with Vega. is it a future fail?
Uses more power than the 1080 Ti for 1070 performance. It's DOA, even AMD is saying "wait for Navi"

>>381667545
thanks anonbro