>wanna buy 7700k >it heats to 90c without oerclocking

>>381657475
I recommend using a cooling solution instead of running the poor thing naked

>heats to 90c
lol no you fuckin fag, just don't use a shitty cooler

File: noct.jpg (9KB, 214x235px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 214x235px

>>381657540
>>381657532
It heats to 90c with Noctua you illiterate peasants.

You literally need to delid it to make it work like a fucking normal CPU and not a half-assed trash with some shit glued to a chip.

>>381657772
uh where'd you say noctua in the original post?
cause you fuckin didn't you stupid fucking cunt.
you need to kill yourself immediately and delete this thread

>>381657772
I recommend using cooling paste instead of slapping the poor cooler on the poor chip dry
Every indicator in this thread points towars the person in the front of the desktop being the issue, as usual

>>381657772
>It heats to 90c with Noctua you illiterate peasants
It's intel, of course it's a stuttery housefire piece of shit.

>>381657772
Noctua is shit

>>381657772
That's too weak, try some 400mm rad with triple fans

>>381657475
>it heats to 90c without oerclocking
Nice try AMD shill

>>381657772
>new Intel overheats more than an overcooked fx_8350

Can't even make this shit up

>>381657971
b8

>>381657475
Liquid nitrogen is recommended when it comes to intel abortions.

Yeah.... not true, meanwhile Ryzen runs at 90C at stock

>>381657890
>that damage control of intel shill

Pathetic.

>>381658121
Without a cooler*

>>381658121
>source: my ass

>>381658137
lel idgaf about intel vs amd
read the fuckin post you stupid faggot.

Get an Ryzen 1700 and OC it to 3.8-4Ghz.
I was in the same situation a couple of weeks ago and this video ultimately convinced me to go AMD this time.
https://youtu.be/BXVIPo_qbc4

The gaming difference is marginal in most games and Ryzen performance is also getting better over time if the devs care about it.

>>381658121
no it doesn't

File: 1460765328405.jpg (108KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1280x720px

http://www.pcgamer.com/intels-tells-core-i7-7700k-owners-to-stop-overclocking-to-avoid-high-temps/

>We appreciate the feedback you have provided, and your patience as we investigated this behavior. The reported behavior of the 7th Generation Intel Core i7-7700K Processor, showing momentary temperature changes from the idle temperature, is normal while completing a task (like opening a browser or an application or a program).
>In our internal investigation, we did not observe temperature variation outside of the expected behavior and recommended specifications. For processor specifications, please refer to the Intel Core i7-7700K Processor Product Specifications.
>Most motherboard manufacturers offer customizable fan speed control settings that may allow for smoother transition of fan revolutions per minute (rpm). Please consult your motherboard manufacturer’s manual or website for instructions on how to change default fan speed control settings.
>We do not recommend running outside the processor specifications, such as by exceeding processor frequency or voltage specifications, or removing of the integrated heat spreader (sometimes called 'de-lidding'). These actions will void the processor warranty."

The TL;DR version is that everything checks out on Intel's end and users should not overclocked their Core i7-7700K processors, which have unlocked multipliers specifically for overclocking.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>Existential Crisis: Intel i7-7740X
>Review: tl;dw Reaches 100c @5.1ghz with a 280mm rad at 100% fan speed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc2_T-wq8qQ

File: maxresdefault-36.jpg (314KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 1280x720px

Where can I buy a special kit that makes 7700k a normal functioning CPU instead of a dogshit garbage that overheats to 90c without OC?

>>381658383
Delid it

File: Intel best.jpg (243KB, 1230x881px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1230x881px

What a time to be alive.

Just need to risk your dogshit Intel CPU to make it work like a normal CPU,

File: Bomb has been delid.jpg (43KB, 679x367px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 679x367px

>>381658383
>>381658465
>>381658283

OY GEVALT, DELID THIS RIGHT NOW!!!

File: OPisafag.png (38KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 660x525px

Yeah, you're taking the piss. I have an i7 7700K OC and it's doing fine.

Intel is doing the equivalent of "just install linux from scratch"
Most won't and will end up with a joke of a product

>got an i7700k to upgrade my PC, second time effectively building a PC
>had somehow never heard of needing a "Z" motherboard for overclocking
Too much effort to replace the mobo, after having to deal with after one of the parts not working, can still overclock it partially with this mobo though. I feel like such an idiot.

>>381658591
That's at idle, of course it's fine. Run a stress test for five minutes and get back to us.

>>381658591
It would be shocking to know that it doesn't even work with the browser you use to make your dumb posts on 4chan because it's pretty obvious that you have no games to play anyway.

>>381658674
>five minutes in OCCT/p95
That's not stability test, unless it runs for 24 hours your OC might as well be useless

>>381658728
Anon, I asked him to run a stress test so we could see the temperatures, which WOULD be about as high as they'll get after five minutes.
I know how to OC properly, don't assume shit.

Is it worth delidding any older intel CPUs? I have a 4790k and if I can get a little bit more performance out of it that'd be dope.

>>381658875
If you don't want to sell it later then you can risk its life.

File: LQB.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

What a fucking retarded ass b8 thread.

SAGE

>>381658201
Delete this, goy, games don't use more than two cores.

>>381658201
1600 is better for the money

>>381657475
>year of our lord
>buying a shitty housefire quadcore cpu

File: 800x600px-LL-6e8b56f9_1636912599_4.jpg (154KB, 800x531px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 800x531px

Plebs.

>>381657532

Either get it delid it turn off HTT and ram clocking.

File: 3A2F92F6-0873-40B9-9A3A-0EA77CB729D4_zpsss5lyzbf.jpg (291KB, 1000x1024px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1000x1024px

>>381659263

File: Capture.png (21KB, 332x374px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 332x374px

>>381657772
>wanna buy a 7700k
>somehow know it overheats on the best aircooler
>fell for every meme on /g/ and posted his shill thread on /v/

Well it works fine for me

>>381657475
>>381657772
so after reading that, do you guys leave your 7700k's at stock speeds or something? or just water cool it

>>381657475
>my idle is 35 maybe 40 sometimes
how do they keep getting away with this

>>381657475
Works for me. :^)

Top kek

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc2_T-wq8qQ

i fucking hate AMD shill they ruined the fucking CPU industry with their fucking fanboyism fuck fuck

>>381659624
>Amd releases good CPU's that obsoletes i5 and trash housefire quadcore

>AMD IS RUINING THE INDUSTRY

really made me think

File: 1497861724154.jpg (193KB, 681x768px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 681x768px

>>381659624
>facts
>ruin the fucking CPU industry

stay mad, jive turky

>>381659624
Seriously, do we fucking need console war-esque shit within the PC world.

>>381658958
Wow you are heating up!

>>381659263
>retards don't know that watercooling generates more noise and works less effective than air cooling

>>381659738
more like reduce intel's lineup to 2 SKU's
>Bentium G4560
>i7 7700k Housefire™ Edition

>>381659775
>>381659738
It's not facts and Ryzen is not a good CPU

Why would I buy a new cpu when I still have a 2500k.

>>381657475
Just get a 6700k if you want to stay with Intel.
Very similar performance to the 7700k, runs cooler, and you can use it on Windows 7.

>>381659956
>Windows 7

>>381659858
>RYZEN IS NOT A GOOD CPU CAUSE I SAID SO
wew status: lad.

>buy ryzen 1700
>runs at 50C during gaming in the summer
>60C under full load while being pretty quiet
>with the boxed cooler

>>381657475
>wanna buy any GPU
>everyone out of stock because "bitcoins lmao"

>>381660080
Why would anyone come on the internet to tell lies?

>>381660091
nice damage control, Shekelchaser. talk about CPU's or crawl back into the oven.

>>381659842
Water cooling can be worth it if you buy a 240mm or bigger radiator

>>381658674
Except stress tests aren't for that since your CPU isn't under such load 24/7 you mongoloid

File: 1498246983393.gif (984KB, 500x230px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 500x230px

Fuck this shit, I don't know where the Intel shilling ends and the AMD shilling begins. Fuck both of you. I'm switching to IBM Power or SiFive.

>>381660158
>Why would anyone come on the internet to tell lies?

AMD's boxed cooler, Wraith Spire, is actually really good. performance is on pair with Evo 212 while being a bit louder. thats a 20-30$ cooler.

>>381660217
Water cooling is worthless garbage and is only "useful" for "aesthetics".
Basically for people who put their fucking PC case on the desk and watch their RGB LEDs.

>>381659854
People buying the 7700k are pretty stupid
I'll take twice the multicore performance + 30% lower power consumption + much easier to cool + slightly cheaper + don't need an expensive Z270 board to overclock over slightly better single core performance any day

>>381659263
>>381659326
Jesus christ
Why not just take a refrigerator cooler and stick it in there

File: 1.60.png (1KB, 285x19px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 285x19px

>>381660178
I don't have enough resources to talk about CPUs

File: 1492855909643.png (944KB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1228x1502px

>>381659624
I HATE AMD SO MUCH

File: 1435809998955.png (1MB, 1207x1066px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1207x1066px

>>381659842
>calls people retarded
>calls a Phase Change cooling a liquid cooling rig

>>381660360
If you want to overclock as high as possible you will need one
But for general usage its a waste of money
Just grab a decent air cooler, or use the boxed one (the Wraight Spire that comes with 1500x, 1600 and 1700 is pretty good)

>>381660347
The only reason why it's good is because Ryzen is so low-powered.

>>381660430
buy Pentium G4560 (<60€ in yorupoor) with a cheap mobo, but Ram is expensive right now. only if you need to..

File: CoreTemp.png (24KB, 420x467px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 420x467px

>Still sitting with an i5 Devil's Canyon.
>Don't OC often because only on a z87 mobo.
>Still can play whatever I want on whatever settings I want.

Only rocking a 212 coolermaster also. When I do OC, I just do a bit above 4.1Ghz at 1.2volt. Ran Prime95 for 24 hours with it. Temp didn't exceed 68.

I have my i7 7700K clocked at 5.0GHz with a artic freeze v3 cpu fan and artic freeze thermal paste. I also have a good airflow system for my PC. It's never gone above 75C

>>381660564
It is a pretty nice cooler
Quiet fan and with plenty of headroom for overclocking and hot summer days
Won't compete with a 25€ tower cooler, but its enough

I want /g/ to fuck off back to their containment board where they can wank over Linux and AMD poos in loos all they want.

>>381660360
It can potentially provide more cooling than what you can get for a tower heatsink without going for the retardedly huge heatsinks. A 120mm rad is a pretty shit deal, though. Same performance as a mainstream tower cooler for more money.

>>381660564
>The only reason why it's good is because Ryzen is so low-powered.


because Zen Core's are mostly aimed at the server market, efficiency is king. GloFo's process is called Low Power Process for a reason.
as you see in some jewtube links, R7 1700 performs damn good while lower clocked.

File: mlgXxXTh1nM4N.jpg (158KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1280x1024px

>>381657475
>he didnt delid this
>he didnt get the 6700k when it was being sold off

35c @4.8 in summer. literally no need to upgrade for the next decade unless you want a workstation.
if you are buying new right now, ryzen is the way to go till intel get their shit together.

>>381660591
I have an Asus Z87M-Plus motherboard and I have my 4690K OC to 4.6GHz core and 4.2Ghz uncore.

along as you have good vrms what does it matters if you run a z87, the only thing you're missing is M.2 and some other SATA gimmick.

>>381657475
Can I buy i5 7600k instead?

>>381660890
nope, get a R5 1600.

>>381657475
If u can afford 7700k i7 then u can afford water cooling. Eventually u can buy Ryzen.

>>381658121
X chips had 20 degree intel uses cum as tim so the 7700k actually runs hot if you dont delid

>US VS THEM
>THEM VS US
>US VS THEM
>THEM VS US
weeeeeee these threads are stupid

>>381660582
This is a laptop
Thanks, but I'm getting new PC soon anyway, pretty much everything is there, but GPUs are out of stock in most countries and if they aren't then the price is like two times higher than a couple of months ago. Everyone is mad at coinniggers.

>>381660890
Yes don't listen to the AMD shills in this thread. It's taken AMD 10 years to catch up. Even then Ryzen is honestly disappointing as fuck.

Delid the 7700, cost a bit more for the machine but it can lower temps 10-30 degrees C

>>381661039
>but GPUs are out of stock in most countries
i feel you, anon. had to buy a new GPU but RX580 is out of stock ever since. got a MSI 1070 quicksilver oc for 360€ + ghost bacon: wildlands. can't complain with price/performance ratio.

>>381660890
Are you stupid? Get the R5 1600 or 1600x if you don't wanna overclock.

>>381660890
Don't buy i5s

>>381660890
Just get a Ryzen 1600

>>381661220
why?

>>381661242
Because they're obsolete.

>>381660407
Moisture.

File: goty.gif (890KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

890KB, 400x225px

>>381659854
The g4560 is easily the best cpu this generation.
>dirt fucking cheap
>can handle upto 1070 gpu without hitting the bottle neck meme
>exists because intel panicked when ryzen fucked its mid market i5s
>its does more damage to intels own lineup than AMD by obsoleting i3s
>AMD wont be able to match it at this price point.

File: spiccy.png (18KB, 437x365px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 437x365px

works for me

>>381660843
What voltage do you set to get 4.6Ghz? I just remember reading the z97 helps "unlock the true power of Devil's Canyon" somewhere before. And like I said, 1.2 volts gets me like 4.1/4.15, and stress testing it puts it at 68 which I really don't want to break 70C, right?

>>381661242
>>381661242
because R5 1600 exist.
>cheaper
>unlocked multiplier
>futureproof platform AM4 (will stay at least 3 generations)
>not a housefire™

only downside is you need some good, fast RAM. but it's actually is not AMD's fault the fucking price for RAM doubled cause phoneniggers need RAM too and no one is ramping up DDR4 production.

Ryzen is terribly overhyped crap that falls short against intel in gaming.

Yet the shills here eat it all up as it's all they can afford on mommys credit card.

>>381661417
its random lottery with kabylake congrats you "won"

>>381657901
This is a widespread issue.
https://archive.is/20170504231723/http://www.pcgamer.com/intels-tells-core-i7-7700k-owners-to-stop-overclocking-to-avoid-high-temps/#selection-343.0-343.73
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-x-series-skylake-x-kaby-lake-x-x299-basin-falls-core-i9,34545.html

File: oyvey.jpg (118KB, 1286x724px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1286x724px

>>381661487

>>381661487
It only loses in single core performance, retarded moron.

>>381661487
Ryzen can keep up with the i5 +/- a few frames in gaming and absolutely crushes the i5 is everything else. I am not sure why morons are shilling intel.

Only intel CPU worth buying now is the G450 or the 7700k

>>381661107
oy vey

>>381659427
A 2 second google search revealed that many people run the same cpu with fat overclocks and the same cooler at low temps, so OP is likely a shitter

File: Intel.png (117KB, 763x930px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 763x930px

Reminder that by buying Intel you support a heavily anti-consumer company.

File: 3212.jpg (60KB, 686x750px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 686x750px

>>381660890
So at first I was in dilemma between i7 and i5 for my new PC. Never touched PC since I bought PS3 and later PS4.
But now you added AMD for my list, you don't make it easy for me lads!

>>381660843
Mine only goes to 4,4 at 1,28v and the uncore is at stock because it competely shits the bed when ocd
Oh well, better than nothing I guess

File: 1498293442705.png (35KB, 1093x579px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1093x579px

>this kills the intelaviv shills

one update for Ryzen brings more performance than intel moving from skylake to kabylake

>>381661741
Get a Ryzen 1600 or 1700
1600 is by far the best value and is barely any worse in gaming than the 1700 while being 100$ less
The 1700 is nice if you do stuff like encoding, compressing a lot of shit, and general productivity
Or just like to leave a shitload of stuff open in the background

>>381661487
Pentium 4 apologist pls go

File: 71wdTZXkokL._SL1306_.jpg (138KB, 1306x1306px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1306x1306px

>tfw still rocking this

File: 2790528-5439472555-B78W6.jpg (21KB, 600x324px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x324px

>>381661971

File: q6600.png (18KB, 797x643px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 797x643px

>>381661971
You are like a little baby
Watch this

File: I69-3570K_ph01_mn_2373004.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>381661971
my brother from another mother, still going strong

though I have yet to OC it

File: 1464607341474.jpg (196KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 720x540px

>>381661568
i5s have been bad for gaming for a long time

they have huge frame delays
>>381661971
>mfw P2 died in feb
>dropped fx8350 in its socket
>got worse preformance
>replaced it all with a returned 6700k
was a tough choice changing but the intel was cheaper than amd when i bought it

File: Joe Rogain.jpg (172KB, 819x683px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 819x683px

>>381662167

File: 1496535657334.jpg (34KB, 600x639px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x639px

>>381659624
>>381659858
>$0.01 deposited into your Intel™ account

>>381657475
Wait for Coffee Lake + Volta combo for best gaming experience.

>Even /v/ shits on intel now

What a time to be alive

File: maxresdefault.jpg (27KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1440x1080px

>>381662539

>>381662564
Now if only /v/ will shit on Nvidia. Oh wait, they can't, cause everyone owns Nvidia cards due to miners. Fucking miners.

Intel pretty much handed this year over to AMD. So did Nvidia, come to think of it.

I, for one, welcome our new AMD overlords.

>>381660360
280 rads are more effective
they also clip onto the socket rather than hanging 2 kilos of metal off it

good models of each generate almost 0 (zero) noise so that's really a non issue.

all fans will eventually wear out,all pumps will eventually fail. deal with it

Is there a magic best kind of thermal paste? I would imagine not.

>>381662791
Manjuice
It's a trade secret

>>381662759
>So did Nvidia, come to think of it.
>No one can buy AMD cards due to miners
>Still no Vega specs
>Year of AMD

>>381662665
I am a gamer man, I don't care about brands, but Coffee Lake + Volta will be the best combo.

Volta will curbstomp Vega.

>>381662974
source: my ass

back into the oven.

>>381657971
Overpriced and overrated.
People claiming they make the BEST heatsinks and/or fans are just delusioned customers.

Add to that, comparing CFM and RPM to noise, they aren't that silent.

But whatever it's a product and it has a market.
Now to mitigate Noctua idiots coming at me...
>watercooling is cheap! lookatme too
Fuck off.

>>381663054
You honestly believe Vega has a chance against Volta? lmfao. Vega sounds gay as fuck, feminine trash. Volta sounsd masculine, storng, fast, cool.

Volta will rape Vega.

File: d0bdd82f5b5cc4e6a663b531454841ba.png (1KB, 222x17px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 222x17px

>>381660430
This 2005 shit somehow runs League of Faggots at 60 FPS.

>Tfw my $337 4c/8t cpu shits all over AMD's $500 8c/16t cpu
Feelsgoodman

>>381663683
>>381663727
>things that never happen

>>381661729
>Reminder that by buying Intel you support a heavily anti-consumer company.

I never used a single AMD CPU but how can you fucking defend modern Intel CPUs?
The fact that they are releasing K series with a glued shit that requires delidding is mind blowing. That's nothing but jewery.

>>381662767
>all fans will eventually wear out,all pumps will eventually fail. deal with it
You realize that water cooling uses fans, right? Retard.

>>381663727
>shits all over
>Implying constant stuttering and 3 more FPS in the maximum's is shitting all over a better CPU

There is no reason to go with Ryzen even for multithreaded stuff.

You can buy a 10 core Xeon 2666 v3 ES for $275.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Xeon-2666-V3-ES-QFSC-2-9GHz-25MB-10Core-Max-Turbo-3-2GHz-22nm-R2-135W-CPU-/401342615318

>>381662539
>coffin lake

>>381664148
>Used crap

Top kek

File: ayyyyyy.png (815KB, 885x768px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 885x768px

>>381664276

>>381661448
1.266v core to hit 4.6Ghz, it doesn't really matters if you go above 70ºC though, Intel CPUs have a Tjmax of 100ºC, something like 80ºC is still fine and I would only worry if you're consistently hitting the 90s I've had mine in the 90s while testing in Prime95 for 48 hours and nothing happened. What kills CPUs is voltage not temperature.

>>381661776
Have you tried increasing the VCCIN? I have that set to 1.9v because I could't go over 4.4Ghz either even with the same voltage I run currently for 4.6GHz.

>>381662167
>stock clocks
Come on senpai, atleast bump it to 3ghz, it's still ok for most games

>People comparing CPU on /v/
>When GPU is the heavy lifter in most games
Fucking /g/ cancer

>>381664863
For GPUs there is no comparison.
Nividia is for gaming and ATI is for mining.

>>381662759
>amd selling out of cards non stop is bad for amd
>the only gpu sales that count for amd are ones
bought by gaymers

retard

File: 1497225926002.gif (348KB, 540x400px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 540x400px

>>381660342
here's the truth. Ryzen are very good cpus. single core performance is still behind intel but not by as much so intel cpus are still better for gaming. Ryzen is a beast in multi core performance though so it's better than intel for that. Intel fanboys are mad because there's actual competition in the market now

>>381665004
AMD shortage has affect Nvidia as well. 1060 and 1070 are out of stock in certain countries or are 10-20% more expensive than they were a weak ago. God help AMD if Vega is good for gaming.

>>381665050
it's /v/. they REALLY are that stupid

>>381665004
miners use pascal cards for mining different cryptoshit too, anon...

>>381657475
>subtle AMD shilling thread
Report and ignore all viral marketing threads

>>381665595
>DELETE GOYIM

>>381661582
Which is apparently still important for games b/c game devs are/were lazy shits that can't seem to program their garbage to properly work on more than one core, maybe two cores if you're lucky.

Between an i5 7500 and a Ryzen 5 1400, which is better? The only cons I've managed to find is that the i5 has better single core performance but other than that they're pretty much the same.

File: Voltatv[1].jpg (16KB, 271x184px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 271x184px

>>381663683

so manly lol

>>381665925
i5 7500 no contest
The 1400 and 1500X are worse than the i5 7600, and the 1500X has hyperthreading.

>>381665915
>Which is apparently still important for games b/c game devs are/were lazy shits that can't seem to program their garbage to properly work on more than one core, maybe two cores if you're lucky.

It is for now, but it's hardly futureproof.
And if you compare multi-core CPUs like Ryzons and i9 the choice is pretty obvious.

File: 1498161708831.png (26KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 711x533px

>>381666160
>i9

lmao

File: shits on fire yo.png (105KB, 1444x739px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1444x739px

>feelsgoodman.jog

File: 1491227918789.png (378KB, 708x1000px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 708x1000px

>>381666281
>can't even hit 4.0GHz on all cores
Pathetic and inadequate like a white guy's dick

>>381666160
>i9

weak bait

File: 695.png (253KB, 680x460px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 680x460px

>>381666254
>>381666530
The point is AMD wins vs i9, you idiots.

>>381657475
Why though? Isn't it identical to the lesser clocked i7s? those can be clocked high without any issues most of the time.

>>381657475
Your fault for not getting the superior AMD

>>381667006
No it fucking doesn't
>limited to eight cores
>only has 16 PCIe lanes versus 24-44
>only has dual-channel memory versus quad-channel
>can barely hit 4.0GHz when overclocked when i9s can go beyond that
>lower IPC and single-threaded performance compared to Skylake-X, which has the same if not slightly more single-threaded performance than Kaby Lake

File: 1496145489774.jpg (510KB, 1315x794px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1315x794px

>>381657475

>>381660347
can confirm. 1600 w/ stock cooler runs at 40 overclocked to 3.6. Nice and quiet too

>>381667267
>Threadripper

>>381667465
>higher cross-CCX and cross-silicon latencies than accessing the fucking memory
>better than Intel
kill yourself

File: T74PtOO.jpg (1MB, 2322x4128px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2322x4128px

>>381661971
>>381662167
Children I tell you what.
I have a conspiracy theory that the thing has a set self destruction mechanism on summers. Even if there's 10C outside and I had replaced thermal paste, it still demands that it's over 100C and has overheated.

>>381667267

SIXTY
FOUR
FUCKING
PCIE
LANES

File: 1498073728126.jpg (46KB, 582x794px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 582x794px

>falling for AMD meme
Y'all niggas will never learn

>>381667687
The mesh of ringbusses is unsurprisingly shit.

>>381657475
90c is insane, every 10C is 1 year less according to googles numbers. OP must have wattage deficiency somewhere in the power source.

>>381667779
amd is finished

File: 1496678150431.jpg (88KB, 402x402px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 402x402px

>>381667267
Wait are you actually trying to argue in defense of Shilltel?

Holy SHIT

>>381667687
And yet it's still better than i9 disasters.

>>381667267
But anon you're comparing a $400 (R7 + B350 mobo) amd setup to an i9's $1300 ( i9 7900x + x299 mobo) If you wanna compare apples to apples you'll have to wait for Threadripper benchmarks

>tfw still using an fx8150

So should I buy a ryzen or get a new GPU?

File: S7OcqJs.jpg (43KB, 330x414px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 330x414px

>>381667779
>72.1
>72.2

>>381667267
>limited to eight cores
it's 8-core per CCX, faggot
>only has 16 PCIe lanes versus 24-44
ever Ryzen CPU has 24 Lanes unlike the cucked 7700k with 16, pay more for more lanes faggot
>only has dual-channel memory versus quad-channel
do you understand what HEDT is?
Threadripper will have quadchannel Mem with 64 lanes on all SKU's ranging from 10 cores to 16 cores, faggot.
>can barely hit 4.0GHz when overclocked when i9s can go beyond that
look at this>>381666254 STOCK i9 draw 230W without a OC, ~400W @ 4.6Ghz, faggot.
>lower IPC and single-threaded performance compared to Skylake-X, which has the same if not slightly more single-threaded performance than Kaby Lake
yeah while disable all but 2 cores for Turboboost 3.0, faggot

holy shit, don't ever reproduce /v/ermin.

>Baidu goes all-in with EPYC

Now I know /v/ has no idea who Baidu are and how serious business them going AMD is but know this: Intel would do just about anything to get Baidu on their side.

>>381667779
lel those fucking error bars

File: 1487366813075.png (9KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 500x500px

>>381667779
That huge bar for a 1 fps difference

>>381668060
No, I'm comparing a 1800X+X370 ($499+$250) to a i9-7800X ($359+$250). Two less cores, but higher multi-threaded performance, much higher single-threaded performance, more PCIe lanes, twice the memory channels, and higher possible frequencies.
A six core i9 makes mincemeat out of any AM4 Ryzen and is cheaper than the flagship 1800X.

>>381668083
wait for zen2

>>381659738
Don't bother. Intel fanboys are hysterical that AMD is on point right now and Intel is flailing like retards in response.

Coming from someone with a 6600k and Intel ssd.

>Even Linusshilltips shits on skylake-x

End times cometh.

>Amd has the best cards /v/ says
>580 out of stock
>570 out of stock
>560 is shit
>No news on Vega
>No Aftermarket expect till September
Bravo Raja Bravo

>>381660890
R5 1600 would be the more affordable and wiser purchase. Much more bang for the buck.

>>381668551
No they didn't. They simply said, it is pretty good but wait for threadripper and then come to a better conclusion.

What games would actually benefit from an over locked i7?
Damn near any application I could think of that might benefit from it would benefit even more from better gpu, more RAM, or a better hard drive.
Maybe emulators?

File: JUST krzanich.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>>381667267
it's like Brian is personally shitposting on /g/ & /v/

>>381668243
>AMDrone can't refute this
kek, even the eight core i9-7820X is still a much stronger value and performance proposition than whatever shit Ryzen has out at the moment

wait, why do you wanna buy 7700k?

File: latency-pingtimes-7900x.png (148KB, 602x389px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 602x389px

>>381667687
hahahahaahah HAHAHAHAHAHA

File: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9JL1AvNjg0OTYxL29yaWdpbmFsLzAzLVBvd2VyLUNvbnN1bXB0aW9uLUdhbWluZy5wbmc=.png (24KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 711x533px

>>381666254
>Torture Loop
In other words an artificial benchmark with no relation to real world usage.

File: aadddd.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>381668919
>i9
>gayman

can't make that shit up

>>381668207
It's making fun of the Intel shills. Nvidia and ATI do it worse, to be fair.

>>381659341
Nice job anon

File: 1457800245412.jpg (39KB, 605x375px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 605x375px

>>381659926
this. 2500k was intel's biggest mistake

File: opisdumb.png (169KB, 838x684px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 838x684px

>>381657475
Try harder

File: CryoRig-C1-base-plate.jpg (764KB, 2160x1620px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 2160x1620px

>>381657475
>>381657772
did you remove the "remove before installation" plastic label from the bottom of the cooler..? don't jump in to conclusions, 7700k doesn't overheat w/ base clock, and if it does you just have shitty luck or your voltage settings are fucked up.

>>381657475
I have a 7600K and have not once seen it go above 50 degrees. All I'm using is a 60 dollar liquid cooler too.

>>381657772
70c max at 5ghz
You're just a retarded faggot

>>381657475
>wanna buy 7700k
So you wanna buy it
>it heats to 90c without oerclocking
So you bought it then?
>intel doesn't recommend to OC it
On stock coolers, no
>K version
Yes, that's a K version
>can't OC
It's a K version so it have multipliers unlocked so no, it can OC.

Got some more bullshit AMD Shill?

File: images (1).png (6KB, 221x228px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 221x228px

>>381670352
Project harder, shill.

http://www.pcgamer.com/intels-tells-core-i7-7700k-owners-to-stop-overclocking-to-avoid-high-temps/

He needs to delid if he wants to OC on air.

File: Sachikon.jpg (21KB, 217x204px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 217x204px

Why do you need to overclock a 7700k?
99% of video games on the market are console ports designed for 10 year old hardware or indieshit/mobile phone ports.

What game needs that kind of power?

>>381668557
blame miners

>>381670582
>No indication of third party coolers brought up.
Don't OC on stock cooler, you retard.

>>381670628
>Why do you need to overclock
>Why do you need your CPU at 50C under load, it works fine at 100C
>Why do you need to use more than 4 cores, 4 cores are enough for everyday task
>Why Why WHY

>>381670628
Shitty console ports that needs PC hardware that's 3x more powerful that the consoles just to barely run the game with sub-console tier visuals at 10-20FPS.

>>381657475
>falling for the overclock meme
my 7600 non k runs just fine senpai a lam

>>381670727
7700k doesn't even come with a cooler you shill.

>>381670352
Modern K processors don't even come with coolers.

File: who could be behind this.png (6KB, 356x480px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 356x480px

>>381657475
>subtle shill thread to make intels products look bad
>all the classics like stutter, housefire that needs deliding
Gee I wonder who can be behind this

>>381658654
should've done AMD then, both the X and B boards can OC, and there are barely any A boards on the market

>>381672765
It's not even a shill at this point, i9's throttle with a normal clc in a case.

File: 1489323093950.jpg (16KB, 512x383px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 512x383px

>AMD chips run really cool and consume very little power
>Intel chips now consume loads of power and a house fires
how did this even happen?

>>381671172
I don't think I've ever seen someone blown out so concisely.
that was beautiful anon.

File: 1497803171159.png (72KB, 449x498px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 449x498px

>>381668820
How did they fuck that up, thats almost as high as cross CCX communication.

>>381674786
>It's not even a shill at this point
I like it when facts are stated. Not memes blowing things out of proportion while at the same time memes that promote your own product are posted.
I have a real hard time telling genuine retarded fanboys and shills apart.
But in the end they both are shills, one just gets payed for it.

>>381674984
Intel caught the DUUUDE MORE CORES bug after AMD undercut their high end

>>381675126
Skylake X was thrown together at the last minute as a response to Ryzen for CES.
High heat and power usage as well as bad latency between cores?
They literally just added more cores and changed socket to make it look like they did more.

>>381657475
>2017
>buying intel

its like you enjoy having jews take your money.

Get Ryzen like everyone else,

So this thing is officially a hot mess and I should get a Ryzen instead?

>>381675760
yes.

When it comes to gaming both Ryzen and intel get you over 60fps, since gaming is more GPU bound.

When it comes to multithreaded games (witcher 3) the higher core count of Ryzen kicks the shit out of the the Z270 shit, only being comparable to X99 which is almost 2x the cost.

File: 1467250560144.jpg (54KB, 500x373px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x373px

>>381675646
Purley was meant to release last December, this isn't a last minute product, you can't do that with semiconductors. Tapeout is three months alone.

The last minute part is Intel saying they'll use their MCC die for consumer parts. That's the 14-18 core models. Previous HEDT series topped out with the LCC die. That and Kaby X, that is actually just a socket change.

>>381675760
Intel's X series' processors are the equivalent of a kid throwing together a shitty shoebox diorama the morning it's due because he didn't do any homework at all over the weeks he had.
It's a fucking mess.
From locked features, bad thermals, bad power efficiency and ridiculous pricing, no one who isn't on a government contract with Intel should buy them.

File: Ringbus of fire.png (153KB, 942x569px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 942x569px

>>381676118

Its more telling that Intel haven't said anything about the higher core count chips other than that they will exist in the future - I severely doubt they have fantastic yields on them at the clockspeeds they want to compete against upcoming threadripper. All the "good" hire core count dies are still going into xeons and those absolutely will not clock high (besides, they are binned for low power draw anyway).

give me one reason to upgrade my 4690k

>>381677704

You get cold in the winter - buy an i9 to heat your room up AND play corruption of champions at fps previously unknown to man.

>>381665260
Competition is what it's all about. Now both companies will try to one up each other and we reap the reward.

File: atthisratethegoywillbeterminal.jpg (44KB, 446x422px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 446x422px

>>381680838
You mean now we will have shills on both sides flood boards with memes and we get still the same shit products.
You should know that when behind companies use marketing not actually products to get sucke....I mean customers.

File: __fujiwara_no_mokou_touhou_drawn_by_shangguan_feiying__7810b6a7b8d5aa2fd00e8646986cac74.jpg (73KB, 425x510px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 425x510px

>>381670352
>On stock coolers, no
>>381670727
>Don't OC on stock cooler, you retard.

Do you even realize that there's no STOCK COOLER with K version, you underage newfag?

>>381682856
You can just buy the one without K.
>It's cheaper
>Comes with stock cooler
>Consumes less power
>Works on a dirtcheap H110 board

What exactly is the best cooler?

>>381683157
>locked cpu

yeah nah

>>381657475
>Makle bait thread
>Get replies

Its not even satisfactory when its this easy.

>>381670582
>"We appreciate the feedback you have provided, and your patience as we investigated this behavior. The reported behavior of the 7th Generation Intel Core i7-7700K Processor, showing momentary temperature changes from the idle temperature, is normal while completing a task (like opening a browser or an application or a program).

>In our internal investigation, we did not observe temperature variation outside of the expected behavior and recommended specifications. For processor specifications, please refer to the Intel Core i7-7700K Processor Product Specifications.

>Most motherboard manufacturers offer customizable fan speed control settings that may allow for smoother transition of fan revolutions per minute (rpm). Please consult your motherboard manufacturer’s manual or website for instructions on how to change default fan speed control settings.

>We do not recommend running outside the processor specifications, such as by exceeding processor frequency or voltage specifications, or removing of the integrated heat spreader (sometimes called 'de-lidding'). These actions will void the processor warranty."

Bait/Clicbait news.
Nothing wrong with the I7-7700K.

File: R1 Ultimate.jpg (148KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1000x1000px

>>381683279

>>381659926
It's pretty outdated. I still have one at 4.5GHz and it's really starting to bottleneck my GTX 970. It hits 100% in pretty much every modern game at some point.

>>381683279
Noctua D15.
One of Cryorig high end fans.

>>381684609
A 4GHz+ i5-2500k wont bottleneck a 970.
It will bottleneck a 980/1070 by a lot tho.

File: 1481123525772.png (157KB, 552x560px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 552x560px

>>381683882
Don't be jealous when I'm an expert of fun posting.

>>381669626
>7700k CPU sold specifically to enthusiasts gets to 80-90c extremely quickly with even a moderate overclock due to Intel using some shitty thermal paste instead of solder
>Delidding the chip is the only way to fix it
>"It's the user's fault!"

>>381684716
You obviously don't play many modern games.

>>381684995
Don't argue with the morons, they don't even know how to overclock it.

File: luaghing_negros.gif (3MB, 390x277px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 390x277px

>>381684160
>Don't overclock the processor we are selling to you for unlocked specifically for overclocking

>>381657475
DELID TECH.
Thermal paste > Solder.

>>381685408
AMD has the same warranty, read Overdrive ToS.

I have a 1060 6GB. Processor is next on my list. Which one?

>>381685528
Nobody that overclocks gives a shit about the warranty (aside from DOA hardware).

It's about selling a product marketed to enthusiasts who quickly discover it does not do what the product was marketed to do (in this case, the "K" series for overclocking).

Then, Intel, rather than admitting they fucked up, doubles down by telling people not to overclock the processor they sell for overclocking.

>>381685670
R5 1600

>>381685670
I5-7600k.

Say your budget or everyone will recommend any expensive CPU.

File: 1398107400672.png (381KB, 800x670px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 800x670px

>>381685670
I use the same card with a 45nm i5 760, why would you need to upgrade?

>>381685914
Lynnfield represent. That was the best CPU I ever had. I finally replaced it like two years ago.

Unfortunately, older CPUs can bottleneck newer GPUs.

File: gta-v-cpu-4k-vh.jpg (52KB, 806x532px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 806x532px

>>381686341

>Unfortunately, older CPUs can bottleneck newer GPUs.

Just play at 4K!

>>381686341
Unless you use some greater than average resolution (which is nonsense with that card) or fell for the 144hz meme, there is not a single game which can't be played in 60 fps with that old silicone buddy.

>>381686341
Kentsfield represent here, it just werks.
Then again i use a GTX 1050Ti at 720p.

File: 1413075792310.png (348KB, 448x545px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 448x545px

>>381686787
> GTX 1050Ti at 720p

>>381686973
Used card at $60 or no card at all.
My 1080p backlight died (Never buy Acer stuff) so im using a old dell screen which werks for now so buying a new screen is not a priority.

I need to get a new motherboard, ram and CPU first.

>>381685914
>paying more for a 760 when you can just clock a 750 to a 760 and beyond.

Looking on fleabay right now for replacement.

>got a cheap i5 and z170 motherboard for like 225

Fuck, should I return it and get an i7?

>>381687314
What do you need a I7 for?
Anyway wait for microcenter deals.

>>381657475
you probably put your fan on the wrong way lad

>>381657475
>Have 6600k
>OC to 4.4GHz with a 212EVO on it
>Just barely hits 60c on Prime95
>Only hits 40c under load in real world scenarios though (like an emulator with unlocked framerate)
>Room temp when idle

>Graphics cards fans arnt working
>red light instead of white
WHAT went wrong?

>>381687452
RPCS3 needs an i7 or i9.

>>381657475
>Buying 4c in 2k17
You are an IDIOT

>all that power to run tripple A multiplat trash

I ran homemade watercooling setups 15 years ago, just to get that thunderbird from 800 to 1000Mhz(bad luck with cpu that didn't want to go far)and 5 more fps in counterstrike and unreal.

File: fag.jpg (124KB, 830x634px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 830x634px

>>381657772
>>381657475
Don't be a faggot.

>>381685670
R5 1600

Isn't it basically the same as the 6700K but with an stock OC? I have a 6700K with OC and rarely goes higher than 60º (using a shitty 412s cooler)

>>381663297
Confirmed retard
Coolermaster/Cryorig shill detected

>>381691814
Yes, if you own a skymeme CPU there is no reason to get a kabymeme CPU.

>>381690487

When it says i7 it really means a haswell-E or newer chip (i.e fuckloads of cores) which is why it also suggests using a R7 chip.

>>381691218
>idle CPU temp
>probably also delidded

Wow, its just like that other anon who posted his speccy.

>>381658201
1700X is so much cooler. Gotta have that X man.

>>381691949
But then how can it get so hot?

>>381685914
Late reply, I have an i5 2500k

>>381657475
>>381657772
Yall niggiz postin in a troll thread

>>381661034
how's your first day on /v/ going?

>>381657475

>test cpu during hotest heat wave in ages
>wonder why it gets hot

KyS

What are some good PC parts to buy during this GPU price skyrocket

>>381696979
try second hand

>>381696979
Just wait for it to stabilize. Unless you're doing a build from scratch you can wait a couple months for your 580.

>>381657475
>not just going haswell

File: 4 HOURS.jpg (78KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1280x720px

>BIOS and startup menu doesnt appear on display
>some games glitch after an hour orr two of playing
>poorfag
TFW when i fell for the PCgayming meme

>>381697326
Ha, the 580 is unlikely to reach the hands of the average player, mining ethereum is too profitable atm

>>381698476
Stop buying AMD then.

>>381698476
>BIOS
Oh boy, do I have news for you

>>381659978
>not using Windows 7

>>381701557
>using outdated OS

>>381702343
>2017
>using Windows NT 6.5

>>381702343
>using an uncontrollable spyware OS

>>381701557
>>381702343
>>381702437
>>381703532
>using Windows
>not using Ubuntu

File: LaughtChineseCreature.png (448KB, 846x900px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 846x900px

>>381667779

>>381658121
No. We live in a world where amd processors are cooler and less power hungry than the Intel ones

The W10 things pisses me off so much.

Fuck microshit intel and their jew practises. They promised support the system until 2020, and now this happens.

Fuck this shit. Fuck the jews.

>>381704135
Technically Windows 7 is still supported and works on all system.

Only laptops have problems with it.

>>381704309
on all OLD systems

I wanted upgrade this year. Looks like I'm finding new hobby instead.

>>381704468
W7 still works with Kaby lake and Ryzen.

>>381703765
>Ubuntu
>not Debian

>>381703532
>uses Internet browsers with open traffic and mainstream hardware
>thinks his ISP and federal government doesn't know about him

rofl

>>381704135
I have 0 problems with Windows 10, what are you on about, retard?

>>381704551
Windows 7 will run on Kaby Lake and Ryzen computers but you won't be able to install updates.

>>381704754
You still can do it, what you are talking about was clickbait news.

File: 1388634469259.gif (3MB, 365x341px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 365x341px

>not still using an OC 2600k with a custom loop
>not playing at a res that is GPU reliant

You get jewed hard.

File: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°).png (30KB, 489x282px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 489x282px

hows this

>>381661375
I still have a g3258 oc'd, the pentium comeback had been amazing.

>>381704796
How? Windows Update blocks the updates.

>>381705171
A) Use WSUS.

B) Avoid KB4015552, KB4015549, KB4015549, KB4015546 and KB4012218.

Ryzen APUs when.

File: speccy.png (20KB, 525x387px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 525x387px

>tfw playing all the latest games on at least medium
>tfw spent only 700 yuros on it 5 years ago

File: Speccy 6-24-2017.png (32KB, 736x401px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 736x401px

Waiting for Vega is killing me.

>>381661971
Should I keep rocking mine or move onto an 6700k?