Well, /V/, I decided to get a pc to play games that would be

>>381440529
What build?

>>381440529
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/ZXd4VY
Fuck here you go

>>381440529
I would recommend an i7-7820X to be more future proof

File: 1383788876508.gif (580KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 480x360px

>>381440605
>https://pcpartpicker.com/list/ZXd4VY
>I7
Stop right there. You've already fucked up if you're not gonna stream or do video processing.

No need for that.

>1440
>144hz
You're not gonna get any use out of that. Get 2 1080p instead.
>Microsoft Off

Now I know you're trolling.

>>381440709
Stop recommending i7's for god damn fucking gaming

no game except ARMA is going to use an i7 to it's full capacity, they are never going to use more than 40% of that processor

OP just get a fucking i5 and invest in a good liquid cooling system, overclock that motherfucker as much as you can and you will run anything. Better than wasting a gorillion dollars on literally unused CPU capacity

>>381440709
Not compatible with the motherboard. I think I can find a better mobo though

>>381440605
If you are spending that much put an extra 50 for a cheep ssd for boot

>>381440915
That's the thing. I do a lot of stuff with Premiere Pro, Illustrator, and Photoshop. Microsoft office is for college.

>>381440605
>>381441045 What this guy said, though maybe go a bit bigger. No SSD on this kind of hardware is a waste, since you'll actually want to start up fast, right?

>>381440529
>https://pcpartpicker.com/list/ZXd4VY
Please don't support the w10 Spam Edition and get LTSB instead !

Hijacking thread to ask own question because g won't help. I'm building a pc for a friend and went with ryzen 1600. He doesn't plan to over clock so I didn't get an aftermarket cooler. The included cooler is fine for no over clock I assume? I cant find an answer for that on Google

>>381441974
If the stock cooler was not enough to keep the CPU working at stock clock speed why in hell would they include it

It's a fucking retarded question and i see why /g/ gave you no answer

Anyway im still glad to help. The answer is yes, the included cooler is more than enough

>>381440605
It's pretty close to a computer I built a few months ago.

I would suggest an alternative brand of harddrives instead of Seagate. They have an extremely high failure rate. Western Digital is pretty good.

I don't really like Asus as a brand because their customer service is god awful to the point of non-existence in my experience and I would especially never buy a video card by them but it's your choice.

>>381441974
The answer is yes. People meme a lot about how bad stock coolers are but if your friend is a nub who isn't planning to do anything extra it should be fine. Obviously going with an aftermarket cooler would be better, but if he doesn't have the cash the stock one on Ryzen's is pretty reliable.

>>381442210
>If the stock cooler was not enough to keep the CPU working at stock clock speed why in hell would they include it

Because stock coolers have been incredibly shitty for me in the past and I usually get a 212 or something. I've just never used these ryzen ones

>>381442764
Get a 212 again. It's always still the cheapest bidder.

>>381442725
So
Western Digital instead of Asus. Got it.
Also
I was just using that card as a placeholder. Imma get an nvidia geforce

>>381442764
The stock COU cooler for the Ryzen 1600 is excellent. Comparable with the 212EVO.

Sabe some money and stick with it, or jump a tier up in price and performance, with a diuble grill or an AIO

>>381444512
>The stock COU cooler for the Ryzen 1600 is excellent. Comparable with the 212EVO.

That's good to hear but a little hard to believe. The stuff is being delivered Friday so we will see.

I'd get a 212 but he wanted to save as much as possible and just plans on playing games and no over clock for now. Can add a new cooler later if we need to.

>>381440605
Get an SSD and get rid of your external hard drive