>2017 3D Platformer >Closed, linear world >On rails

>Not Ape Escape 4
Sony fags BTFO even more

File: 1473965295439.jpg (82KB, 920x900px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 920x900px

>30 more fps than the PC version

Thank God. Although it does look slightly worse a d I'd rather have a decent sequel.

>>381240117
Original trilogy was 30fps and we were fine with it then. Stop being a framerate police.

>>381240117

Jesus Christ, whose idea was that graphical style? He looks like one of those freaking Star Fox puppets.

>>381240586
People who post like OP haven't played a PS1 game with their life.

>>381240586
It was 30fps for technical reasons. If possible, ND would have done it at 60. The developers of the trology remake are are claiming that it runs at 30 for aesthetic reasons. Bullshit. They are just shitty and lazy. Proof is it STILL can't hit 4k.

>>381240117
> The 360 was my first console

>>381241045
>was 30fps for technical reasons

Wrong, they could have made it 60fps if they wanted

>>381240353
Activision stated that it would be coming to PS4 and PS4 first. Also admitted that there will be no Xbox release. Makes PC version all but confirmed.

>>381240586
>Game was 30fps 20 years ago so it should stay that way forever.

You dumb fucking retard. Should games stay at 480p too?

>>381241318
Devs stated it's not a timed release during e3. Rev up those petitions.

>>381241234
Yes, and the game would look like shit. The PSX can produce a maximum of around 800 textured polygons on screen at once while maintaining a constant 30.

>>381241353
No. Because resolution isn't the same as framerate. Graphics have become HD, so there's no reason to go back to pixels and shit. Framerate can be different and always has been. It doesn't affect the game much.
But why do you care? You're not gonna buy the game anyway. Let the people who are actually interested make the judgements.

>>381240353
Can already emulate the original trilogy anyway. Crash looks fucking stupid in this remake.

>>381240117
>2017 3D Platformer
>Closed, linear world
>On rails camera
There's literary nothing wrong with that. Go to play GTA if you like open worlds so much.

File: IMG_9456.jpg (1MB, 1456x816px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1456x816px

>>381240117
>feel like preordering this
>But it's an Activision game and will likely be $20 come fall season.

>>381240117
>Closed, linear world
You say that like it's a con.

>>381240117
>Closed, linear world
>On rails camera
And it works because the levels are well designed with the style of gameplay in mind.

>>381241742
OP here. Of course there's nothing wrong with that. You decided to not include all the green text, which if you did, very clearly shows that the game is only 30fps while being a linear platformer with an on rails camera. It's been inexcusable for the last 15 years.

>>381240117
Crash isn't a 3D platformer. Stuff like Mario 64, Jak&Daxter, Banjo, Sonic Adventure are 3D platformers.

>>381242087
Are you autistic?

>>381242087
>Crash isn't a 3D platformer.
I'm sure you platform on 3D

>>381242087
>Crash isn't a collectathon
Fixed

>>381241819
I know that feeling.

>>381240117
*1996 3D platformer

>>381242345
kek, that its true
but that also the reason why it is so short

File: 66346346.jpg (37KB, 466x368px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 466x368px

>>381240586
the game was also 240p back then and we were fine with it too.

>>381242345
What are you talking about? You have to collect/destroy every box to get gems.

>>381242087
>Crash isn't a 3D platformer. Stuff like Mario 64, Jak&Daxter, Banjo, Sonic Adventure are 3D platformers.
You literary platform more on Crash than any of the games you mentioned

>>381240586
>if it's fine then it's fine now
So you're saying there's no point in playing this remake?

>>381242586
Crash is like a clasic side scroller but on 3D.
Go from A to B to win.

>>381241515
>Having more responsive visuals and controls don't affect the game much.
Just because you play videogames on some shitty 4K (((upscaled))) television doesn't mean that things should be that way. Televisions are optimized for cinematic entertainment, not interactive entertainment. As LCD tech improves, televisions now have specific modes that toggle 60 or 120 hertz rather than the babymode 30/24 that is the factory preset.
It's no mystery that console players and normalfags claim that they see no difference between 30 and 60 refresh rates when they're being bottlenecked by their 3rd-world television/monitor setups.
Show someone the difference between refresh rates on a monitor that can meet the refresh rates demanded and it's like night and day.

>>381241515
I would have bought it if it was 60fps :)

>exact 1:1 remake of levels
>tight platformer
>fuck it up with 60fps

nah, 60fps would be nice if it wasnt a 1:1 remake but thats clearly not what they were going for

anyone who is actually looking forward to this game doesnt care about menial shit like this. its not a competitive FPS or something.

>>381242586
Collectathons involve exploring a 3D world and finding stuff.

>>381243038
Then it should be 240p

you cant just bump a game's FPS to 60 without any consequences. it works for some games not all. look at das1 or vanquish, they both had bugs tied with the higher framerate. i expect the same for a platformer with precise controls. im sure they could have made it 60 but then it wouldnt be a 1:1 remake

File: doubble head.png (117KB, 528x402px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 528x402px

what they were thinking?

>>381241819
>>381242365
Fall will be here before you know it. Just go and play some of your backlog.

>>381243239
>implying they literally just added high res textures and models to the FUCKING Ps1 CRASH BANDICOOT ENGINE

Are you retarded?

>>381240117
It's a remake of a 1996 title and its 2 sequels. Don't be a dick.

File: ugh.jpg (15KB, 216x260px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 216x260px

Its 30 fps because they are imitating the original games, which were also 30 fps
Seriously, how can you not know this?

Crash Bandicoot is the only 3D platformer where you get extra rewards/collectibles for playing well. Prove me wrong.

>>381243179
resolution doesnt effect physics in a game you fucking idiot

File: tempProclaimers.jpg (19KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x266px

>>381243258

File: 1497217454718.jpg (33KB, 445x510px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 445x510px

>>381240117
Didn't you get the memo? It's ok when Sony does it.

>>381243424
way to miss still miss the point entirely

>its another people shitposting about FPS in games they would never buy episode

Stop constantly reminding me the game isn't out yet you faggots, I have nothing to kill the time these 2 weeks

>>381243925
point being 1:1 remake? Then make it fuckin 480p again.

30 fps in this day and age HAS NO EXCUSE

>>381244045
>in games they would never buy episode
What makes you assume this? Because you're a drone?

File: 1497468200012.gif (2MB, 395x313px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 395x313px

>>381242586
Then it's a destroy-a-thon, not a collect-a-thon.

>>381243258
I don't get this joke. Is it a turkey club pun or is it because the old clubs kinda looked like drum sticks?

>>381245706
Probably the latter.

>>381241318
>no Xbox release
Proof?
I've seen the Sony Ireland tweet
>>381241425
>being this autistic
Anon, the guy had a gun to his head (put there by Sony/Activision's legal teams), he clearly wanted to say things he knew he couldn't.