>Light and holy-aesthetic characters who want to change things are the bad guys.
>Dark and demonic-aesthetic characters who act all mysterious n shit are the good guys.
>>381107092
Nothing wrong with this.
>>381107241
Too bad it's become such an overdone cliche to the point of in vidya and anime you can obviously tell that the angelic and bright guys are bad.
I mean the only example of an angelic character being good in recent times is Mercy from Overwatch and even then she has a demon skin.
Zealots make for good villains.
>>381107546
So? Just goes to show "light" doesn't nessisarily mean "GOOD" and "dark" doesn't nessisarily mean "BAD".
>>381107959
How about if Both Light and Dark are the actual antagonists
Like your MC is neutral and just wants to be left alone but both Light and Dark forces want him to join for their own reasons?