>5000 hours on record on a single game >negative review

>>381078297
a patch probably ruined it

Update ruined the game for them.
They're addicted and feel it's a waste of time.

Take your pick.

>>381078297
>play game for thousands of hours, having a good time
>developer updates the game in a bad way that makes the once good game a piece of shit
>write about this
easy

>tons of hours with a negative review
>lmoa clearly you like the game otherwise you wouldn't have played it so long
>a couple of hours with a negative review
>xd you don't know what you're talking about game gets good 27 hours in

>>381078358
This.

Robocraft was a good game and i put loads of hours into it.

Now its garbage

I've played my life for ten billion hours and I wouldn't recommend it

>>381078297
This is a legitimate thing when any game these days can be ruined by a single patch.

>>381078445

This, really.

There's no winning or way for your opinion to be valid when you post a negative opinion about some stupid piece of garbage anymore. The Internet has always been a struggle between "my shit doesn't stink" and "your shit is stinking up my stink," since its inception. Now, few remember how it all started because one nigger realized that the nigger on the other end of the BBS wasn't him.

Like the ball-bearing system is an extension of the original rolling-log wheel system, everything that you see now is an extension of that original outrage.

Welcome to Hell.