Will AI affect videogames? I was thinking about it recently,

>>381020621
In a word, no.

In two, fuck no.

AI is over 100 years away at least

>>381021041
>Implying

You've not heard of Moore's law?

>>381021041
gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8

>>381022128
How is that bait though? Do you know how hard AI is to do?

>>381021190
funnily enough, Moore's Law is running out, at least for traditional computers. We have to get quantum to see significant improvements past this point.

>>381021041
you're wrong. I know some people already testing out some crazy shit for cheating in some video games.

>>381022358
Moore's law can't run out by definition

>>381022417
eventually the space you need to pack transistors into gets too goddamned small billy

>>381022417
Most semiconductor industry forecasters, including Gordon Moore,[93] expect Moore's law will end by around 2025.[94][95][96]

In April 2005, Gordon Moore stated in an interview that the projection cannot be sustained indefinitely: "It can't continue forever. The nature of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster happens". He also noted that transistors eventually would reach the limits of miniaturization at atomic levels:

In terms of size [of transistors] you can see that we're approaching the size of atoms which is a fundamental barrier, but it'll be two or three generations before we get that far—but that's as far out as we've ever been able to see. We have another 10 to 20 years before we reach a fundamental limit. By then they'll be able to make bigger chips and have transistor budgets in the billions.[97]

Though a few observers put the limits of Moore's law centuries (250–600 years) in the future,[98][99] these suggestions are largely theoretical.

>>381022583
>>381022681
Moore's law isn't only physical

>>381022583
>>381022681
>Implying AI won't find new ways to push past human understanding of physical limits

>>381022417
It was never a law in the first place, it was an observation of a trend that was repeatedly revised and psuedo intellectuals started using the term to make it sound like they know about computers.

>>381020621
It already has. To both questions.

>>381021041
>THANK GOD EVERYTHING IS AT LEAST (my maximum conceivable remaining lifespan) AWAY
the fact that idiots like this exist is all you need to know. this state has been brought about by an 'AI' - running on human social orders as its substrate, rather than digital computers, but a non-human intelligence nonetheless.

>>381023089
>Implying law has to be legal

It's a concept

File: 1410121261389.png (187KB, 289x263px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 289x263px

>>381023147
>this state has been brought about by an 'AI' - running on human social orders as its substrate, rather than digital computers, but a non-human intelligence nonetheless.

Has there been a development in AI or something?

>>381023673
Nothing in particular. I just find it interesting

>>381020621
ice cream? god I love ice cream!

>>381021190
"Just scale it up" is always the watchword of futurists. The first problem with AI is that the only problem computers can solve is linear algebra, and I guarantee you that "intelligence" is nothing like linear algebra. The second problem is that computers only do linear algebra because of our own deficiencies in modeling systems, and it's not like some other computational design (I'm looking at you, quantum computing) is going to somehow solve millennia-old philosophical problems.

>>381023198
There is no natural force enforcing this "law". It was just an observation about how fast we can shrink transistors. If we invested less money into it for a few years, the law would have been "broken".

File: Auraface.jpg (595KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1200x1200px

>>381020621
Aura

remember that quake thing where they stopped playing

Unrelated but
>More and more powerful everything
>It means that the back of your character is really well textured, almost lifelike
>But wolves still are feral animals that bumrush your ass headfront as soon as they spot you
>NPCs and enemies still have shit AI
>NPCs not interacting with each others
It has been stagnating for 15 years, do something with AI damnit, I'm tired of le graphix meme

>>381024795
What makes your brain different then?

It might doom humanity, but it could save the world. I hope we can one day be run by a computer that understands logic as well as human desires and emotions well enough to lead all of us competently. If anyone can please everyone equally, it'd be a computer.

File: Aida1_161.jpg (5KB, 180x255px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 180x255px

>>381024957
[bubbling noises intensify]

>>381026627
Nobody can please everyone equally.

If you made a computer to try to do that it would kill humanity.

>>381026182
My brain is not a product of our own modeling.

>>381027319
Who says?

>>381020621
We still don't know how the fuck brain works or what is cognition. Also, hard problem of consciousness.

File: giphy.gif (4MB, 480x249px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x249px

>>381026723
we need data drain

>>381027593
The hard problem being?

Fact is we can't make AI, but AI can make itself.

>The future
>AI is so advanced it's at sentient levels of intelligence, can now think, feel and learn independently
>Always gets put in robots
>Until one day someone puts it in a videogame
>That person has their own virtual world full of living, sentient AI's that they can do anything with, be it create a paradise for them or torture them all to the point of suicide

Really activates the almonds

>>381020621
AI is a meme

>>381028475
Actually, it's not. A concept can't be a meme.

>>381027998
I can already tell I'm going to end up falling in love with a qt girl AI who will kill me because she's a sociopath

>>381027997
>The hard problem being?
tl;dr what is qualia and why do we have them

>>381028670
I don't know, what is qualia?

>>381028748
Read about it. I'm not a walking encyclopedia.

>>381027593
Spoiler alert: There is no hard problem of consciousness. Sensations and physical feedback are one and the same.

>>381028932
Then why can't a robot feel?

>>381029797
We haven't figured out how to make them feel yet.

>>381030049
Surely it would be possible though

>>381029797
Why do you say they can't? Obviously no current ones do, they're just pre-recorded soundboards. But we're rapidly closing in on producing AIs that will.

>>381027363
Um, I have to ask, is this a serious question? Or are you one of those faggots who believes that The Matrix is, like, totally what's going on, I mean, wouldn't that be wild?

>>381029797
they can be programmed to feel though

>>381030178
>But we're rapidly closing in on producing AIs that will.

Yeah, ok. Post a source.

>>381030191
What's to say you weren't created by something?

>>381030150
No, it's impossible. Try making some ones and zeros on a piece of paper feel something.

You need to look at the hardware

>>381030470
Make it part of their programming to feel.

Make bad things trigger a response somehow. Give them pain.

>>381030284
Oh, I don't really have an opinion on that, but I said, my brain is not a product of OUR own modeling. Obviously humans weren't created by humans.

>>381027997
>Fact is we can't make AI, but AI can make itself.
But as far as running wild with circular causation goes, this really takes the cake. It's sort of like the conundrum in Dwarf Fortress that metalworking requires an anvil, but anvils are made with metalworking. You just need to migrate from the Mountainhome with an anvil ready-made, and past that, it's Mountainhomes all the way down.

Im just waiting until someone makes a starcraft a.i to sweep the rankings.

File: 1488295447971.jpg (26KB, 170x165px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 170x165px

>how cna we into AI and robots guise???
>dude just program them to think and feel lmao
this fucking thread

Does AI capable in politics?

>>381020621
>people ITT thinking they know about AI on a Mongolian spice forum

Top kekaroo