>game designed entirely around 1-shot kill weapons and imbalanced

its marketed as an authentic star wars experience
whats the problem

I rarely have time to play video games but if it has offline bots, I'll buy it day one. I passed on the first one due to the fact it excluded the prequel and space maps for whatever fucking reason...

File: muh star wars.jpg (80KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x720px

>>380939126
>authentic star wars experience

the jump packs are retarded and they're in the sequel. they exist because of how bad the geometry and terrain are.

>>380939249
the 2nd one has story mode iirc. they even had one of the new Britons from The Force Awakens come on and shill for it.

>>380938962
Class system

No more then Random pickup heroes

You can customize weapons heroes and vehicles

Has all 3 trilogy's more content to pull from, no more 5 BH heroes for empire

Heroes have to be earned and die easier so no 70 kill bobafett runs

Actually has a single player story

FREE DLC maps won't fragment the community

/v/ is going to complain about EA Battlefront 2 regardless of how good/bad it is, it could be a literal remake of Battlefront 2 with HD graphics and new maps and they would STILL complain about how EA is "lazy" and how they're "ripping off" the classics for a quick buck. You literally cannot satisfy this board and I honestly don't see a scenario in which the game is great and /v/ admits it.

Unless they got rid of battlefield skill pickups and the skill cards it'll be just as shit as the other Battlefront was.