What is a PC build that can do a consistent 4k 60fps, ultra settings,

>>380896143
The most expensive build you can concoct ya fucking dingus

File: xboxonex.jpg (208KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 2048x1152px

I got your build right here

>>380896143
Xbone x

>>380896268

Im not building a $3000 PC

>>380896143
2 quadro p6000s, 128 GB 3333 MHz RAM, i9 or extreme series CPU

>>380896361
>>3808963981

>60fps WHILE 4k
>Ultra settings

Tippity-toppity kek my fellow keker

>>380896361
>60FPS
Nope
>4K
Sure
>Ultra settings
lmao

>>380896496
Quadro and Firepro suck for games tho

you can build a 1080ti system for like 1600ish

You're getting memed. No computer system can deliver 4K@60fps, unless you're playing titles years old (even then it's questionable).

>>380896143
Given how you set no limitations or conditions, get any most recent CPU and GPU, 16GB ram(even 32, why not) and you'll be set

>>380896623

I have a pretty good setup from 2014, i5 and 16gigs of ddr3 memory. Could I just upgrade the card?

>>380896679
could you stop making shit up please

>>380896143
CPU overhead doesn't increase linearly as resolution increases so you actually don't need that powerful a CPU for 2160p.
An FX 8320 and a R9 290 could play many 'console-level' games in 2160p several years ago which unsurprisingly is fairly similar to the hardware found in the new XboneX.
If that's the kind of 2160p@60 you'll probably be best off waiting for AMD's single CCX Ryzen+Vega SOC chips to launch later this year. It should get you to that level in $299 builds.

For the absolute best 2160p experience right now, the skys the limit though in practical terms a R5 Ryzen and a mid-range graphics card will do the job.

>>380896143
Above average CPU and 1080ti
There you go

>>380896765
So I want to get to the moon. I know my ladder is only 30 feet long, but if I upgrade it will it be enough?

>>380896443
>>380896765
He's right though, you explicitly ask for consistent 4K60fps on ultra settings, on ALL new games.
Considering titles like Deus EX MD for example run like absolute shit, you would need something along the lines of 1080Ti:s in SLI to stay at a consistent 60fps.

Supposing you didn't mean to be that extreme, you'll be fine with upgrading your GPU. Games, especially the modern taxing ones, are purely GPU bound when you get to 4K. In your case you'd be fine with simply upgrading to something like 1080Ti.

https://www.cyberpowerpc.com/system/Syber-Vapor-Xtreme

I bought this except with a 1080ti for like $1700 after taxes and all, I can seriously max the view distance in ARMA 3 in 4k with everything except AA maxed and still get 60fps while flying jets

>>380896443
I think you can get one for $700
I have a 2011 AMD bulldoser cpu and a GTX 980.
I can run games at 4K 60 fps but my HDMI cable is too long so the signal cuts out so I just play at 1080p, but when I use a shorter cord it works fine.

>>380896962

I have a gtx 980ti, it could do 4k at about 30ish fps

>>380896679
That's true for the games that are not well optimized, and there are quite a few that aren't, but there are way more that are and have no issues reaching 4K@60fps at max settings if the hardware can deliver

File: 1496489678187.jpg (350KB, 1152x2048px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1152x2048px

>Implying human can see anywhere near 4k

File: mad_max_vulkan_benchmarks.png (89KB, 597x1314px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 597x1314px

>>380897108
It will be interesting to see what Feral Interactive manage to get out of DX:MD with the seemingly inevitable Vulkan update.
The update they did to Mad Max is pretty impressive compared to the old high-level APIs.

>>380897228
Name some of them.

>>380896679
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st5JUlPXkRc

Is there a GPU I can upgrade my PC with to get tolerable performance in 4k that won't cost me more than $500?

My current CPU is a 4690k.

File: ubuntu_vs_win10-vulkan.jpg (35KB, 615x509px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 615x509px

>>380897374
The Talos Principle seems really well optimized in its Vulkan version on GNU/Linux based operating systems. 2160p@60+ on a 950.

PC gaming is a meme.

>>380897374
not him, but
GTAV
Destiny 2
Doom
Battlefield 1
Mirror Edge 2admittedly not the best example since it can have its serious dips, but most of the times it has no issues

>>380896607
>>4K
Literally just Forza and Minecraft. Asscreed is already doing checkerboard shit that makes the edges look like some shitty hair filter.

>>380897880
That's years old. OP wanted it for "all new games".

>>380898016
Fuck 4chan hotlinking

A consumer CPU with enough pcie lanes for two GTX 1080ti GPUs and at least 16gb of 3200+MHz RAM. Even then you'll drop below 60 at 4k in many games, especially at ultra.

>>380898120
Lurk more, newfag

>>380898120
Learn how to quote properly, retard.

>>380897374
Literally any title that's not super recent or unoptimised shit like Deus EX or GR Wildlands. Keep in mind video games don't seize to exist a couple of months after release and there are thousands upon thousands of games out there.

You people need to stop making claims like no games being able to run at 4k60 unless you have a super high end rig, it's extremely disingenuous and nothing short of a straight up lie.

4k is a dumb meme
go for 1440p instead

>>380896443

Then stop demanding $3000 PC performance

>>380898187
>>380898203
I know how it works, I just don't remember every time I'm trying to double quote 4k.

>>380897880
>The Talos Principle
Not really related to this discussion, but I'm amazed at how well optimized this game is in general, not just with Vulkan/Linux combo.
I first played it on a single core CPU and a 512MB 9800GT and it had no issues running at stable 30fps(45-50 with fps unlocked) 1080p near max settings.

>>380898025
The posts that reply comes from, which is not OP, states that no pc can deliver 4K@60fps on games and even the older games are questionable, proceding to ask some examples of games that can.
No mention of the games having to be the most recent.

>>380897078
>you need to upgrade your entire PC every 3 years to keep on top
>B-but it's consoles that are too expensive :(

>>380898505
why the need to double quote a term

>>380897751
GTX 1080 is exactly $500 depending where you look, and that should serve you well as long as you don't go full retard with the settings.

>>380896361
This. Save yourself 2500 bucks and buy a one x. You'll be good for 5 more years.

No one optimizes for PC, you the 3k PC won't run anything at 4k ultra 70fps for more than a year or two

File: IMG_7616.png (466KB, 604x565px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 604x565px

>4K on a 55'' monitor that your face is almost pressed against

I hope you realize that this is all a meme. You don't need a display that big for PC, and you won't notice 4K on smaller displays. These meme resolutions are just a band-aid for big screen TVs

>>380898595
Well it is cheaper tho
If you dont go overboard with upgrades

File: laffinfrug.png (201KB, 351x557px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 351x557px

>>380898960
>Save yourself 2500 bucks and buy a one x. You'll be good for 5 more years.

hahaha

>No one optimizes for PC, you the 3k PC won't run anything at 4k ultra 70fps for more than a year or two

AHAHAHAHAHA

>>380898990
>and you won't notice 4K on smaller displays
Yeah you probably won't if you were to look at a small display from the same distance you watch TV from

Dumb people need to stop calling anything they seem incapable to understand a meme

File: rx580-tomb_raider_2013-opengl-official_amd-vs-mesa.png (26KB, 600x241px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x241px

>>380898595
$500 console every 5 years
$250 PC upgrade every 3 years

I actually space my PC upgrades out a bit more than that, the speed increases AMD hardware has seen over the last few years just from driver updates is pretty impressive.
The third-party unofficial Mesa driver can be nearly twice as fast as the official professionally developed AMD driver (referred to as AMDGPU-PRO)

>>380898990
>I've never used a multi-monitor setup

Large format (40"+) displays are an alternative to a traditional small PC display where most users find they need more space and wind up having to buy multiple displays, but multiple displays is not optimal since it locks you into certain workflows and severely limits your available aspect ratios.

A 48" 2160p display has the same PPI as a 24" 1080p display and much greater usability.

>>380899101
>>No one optimizes for PC, you the 3k PC won't run anything at 4k ultra 70fps for more than a year or two
... He isn't wrong. Optimization is a relic of the past.

>>380896617
Not the p6000. Actually the best gaming GPU on the market right now.

>>380898442
This. It's not like you can afford the monitor either.

>>380900213
Large format 2160p displays are actually pretty reasonable compared to the typical 2 or 3 display setup.

>>380900507
I got a 27 inch monitor with 18million:1 contrast and 90% Adobe rgb 1440 for under 300. Gotta love photo editing panels. I could get 3 of these and the cards to run them for less than a decent 4k display and required graphics card.

>>380900507
Gaming on a 55" OLED TV is pretty sweet if you can afford one and the hardware to back the 4K requirements. This years LGs are down to 20ms input lag.

File: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRxoOGt2cCCSRAnUhDiKBeC2ijC6HQa_14gScT-rV0eTt01x-mMZQ.jpg (10KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 225x225px

>>380896361
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>380897143
Have fun with it dying right after warranty ends from bad capacitors.

>>380900089
A 3k PC would vastly outperform every console right now and would last around 6 years before you had to upgrade your GPU.

>>380901402
>I got a 27 inch monitor with 18million:1 contrast and 90% Adobe rgb 1440 for under 300.
>I could get 3 of these and the cards to run them for less than a decent 4k display

$249 * 3 is $747. You can get a decent large format 2160p IPS display for around $699

>and required graphics card

What kind of GPU do you think you need to run to handle a 2160p display? Any modern GPU with display port should do it. My first card that I had driving a 2160p display was a 650.

If you've got any recent GPU it will do, though the number of games you can run at native resolution will vary.
Most high-end pro large format monitors support 1:1 modes with letter boxing, picture in picture, or grid modes which remove any imagined 'advantages' of traditional tiny displays.

>>380901716
The funny part is, the demented console peasants actually think their checkered rendering at medium settings is somehow comparable to PC 4K gaming.