>Tanks are on rails and cannot be controlled freely like they could in ww2, they are basically on rails, can only operate turret
Its like battlefront again.
>>380657943
In WaW*
>>380657943
Isn't it just a payload mode?
>>380657943
The objective-based modes are clearly patterned after Enemy Territory
>>380657943
just play Battlefield 1942
it has more "gameplay" than CoD wwtwo
>>380659558
But ET is actuallyfun.
If you don't like it don't buy it. Quit bitching.
>>380657943
is this your first call of duty game?
>>380660769
If you don't like it, don't read it. Quit bitching.
>>380657943
Good, tank maps were fucking boring in WaW, the maps that featured them were too big for 6v6, and it was a slog trying to destroy them. If you want tanks play Battlefield, CoD is a fast paced, tight quarters arcade shooter.
>>380662350
Honestly this.
>>380662350
>CoD is a fast paced, tight quarters arcade shooter.
No it isn't. The old games had lots of open maps with longer sightlines and it was a lot more engaging than the same shitty reskinned CQB hallway maps over and over.
>>380663281
>the old games
No one gives a shit the past 8 or so games have been fast past cqb
>>380663519
Yeah, and they've all been garbage
And going back to WWII is trying to pander to the old players, but it has the modern shitty map design
Did they give a date for the closed beta?