How did ground zeroes, a $30 tech demo, end up being better than

-Better focus on designing a great setting and set pieces.
-Better gameplay focus: you're constantly on enemy territory, like in past games. Your supplies are limited. And no timer staring & excessive menu surfing.
-Ironically, it was actually FINISHED.

>>380472542
/thread

File: 1465853047858.jpg (56KB, 680x464px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 680x464px

>>380472542
>never played a metal gear
>groud zeroes was """""free""""" with ps plus
>play it
>it's pretty good
>get hyped for the phantom pain
>get disappointed
The missions in ground zeroes were just designed better than the phantom pain

>>380471638

Tighter focus and less room to fuck up

>>380471638

Less meandering filler.

>>380471638
MGSV:PP played me like a goddamn fiddle.

>>380473714
>never played a metal gear
>start with a demo-prequel showcase game for the FIFTH numbered game in the series
I still don't understand WHY people do this.

>>380474570
it was "free"

File: Tying Venom's shoes.png (367KB, 342x628px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 342x628px

>>380471638
Because
Mullet > Ponytail .

>>380474570
>>380474784
MGSV was pretty much stand-alone anyway.

>>380476368
No matter how apologists try to twist it, no it was not.