I see a lot of people on this forum with the opinion that either:

File: image.php.jpg (42KB, 510x425px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 510x425px

I see a lot of people on this forum with the opinion that either:
1) there should not be any more games in The Witcher series;
2) the main character of new games should be someone other than Geralt.

But why?
I have three objective arguments and one subjective argument for the continuation of the series specifically with Geralt as the main character.

1. Potential.
If the guys from CDPR are able to create an interesting story, then why can't they release a new game? Is everybody so scared of the "conveyor" that they prefer death and a dead end to it? The Witcher series has huge potential, and it has yet to fully develop. It would be great if the devs got rid of the old characters (bye-bye, Triss, Yennefer and Ciri) and put Geralt in a new environment.

2. Geralt is an irreplaceable hero.
You have to understand that Geralt is the cornerstone of the series. It's not Lord of the Rings, where the world and the characters are equal; and it's not Skyrim where the world is more interesting than the characters. In our case the world was written for the hero and it would be dead without him. It's like shooting movies about Indiana Jones or James Bourne with some other protagonists.

3. Geralt is a versatile hero.
Geralt is not John Shepard, whose vocation is to save the world. If Shepard were to do anything else, then everyone would be bored - that's the reason why he appeared in only three games and died in the third.
Geralt is a witcher. His profession is such that it would be easy to make a lot of games about him, like short stories in the first book by Sapkowski, and it won't turn worse. He is like Robin Hood, about whom hundreds of ballads were written in the Middle Ages.