/v/ told me that switch will get third party support...but...but...e3...
>>379955356
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO STOP
>>379955028
Why did you think a Nintendo console would get third party support? There's no point, the console is too weak and the games don't sell
>But devkits
They've been out more than enough time.
the worst part about it all is this
if nintendo just came out with a console with ps4/xbox one hardware, JUST a console, no gimicks, nada, and just released all there exclusives on it, metroid, luigi mansion ,pokemon, all that
it would make, BILLIONS. actual billions and destroy the market
but for WHATEVER reason, they're stuck in this mindset of "WE DON'T CARE ABOUT GRAPHICS OR HARDWARE" but then they don't get 3rd party because times, no matter how hard you look at it, have moved on
Nintendo chooses to shoot themselves in the foot every single day and with each console like the damn switch, first fucking trailer had waggling in it like it was 2006, milking a cow minigame? get that shit outta here
as somebody who bought a wii u and played botw and enjoyed the time I played on it, all I could think was
IMAGINE this art style, but on ps4/xbox one artstyle, it would of honestly made that one of the greatest video games ever made, even with all it's flaws, it's ARTSTYLE alone would of carried it, but no, gimped as fuck switch/wii u graphics, w/e the fuck you say ninty.
>>379956609
but on ps4/xbox one hardware*