How is the first Witcher game so goddamn awful and stupid, but

File: hurr.jpg (27KB, 476x346px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 476x346px

>>379715870

>>379715870
3 = 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2

>>379715870
1 >= 2 >>>>>>> turd sandwitch > raw turd >>>>>>>>>>>> * > 3

it's almost as if, like, devs get more ressources with each product they put out and gain experience from their past mistakes

who would've thought

First Witcher is actually a pleb filter.

File: Andrzej_Sapkowski_-_The_Last_Wish.jpg (30KB, 255x413px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 255x413px

Can I just read all the books and skip to TW3?

>>379717006
No, games have nearly (if anything at all) to do with the books as they're set after them

>>379717006
Why would you skip the only two good games in the series yet play a disastrous 4/10 game?

>>379717006
I don't think the books are especially good though they did enhance me enjoyment of the games. Witcher 2 plays a lot like 3 in many ways, it's satisfyingly difficult though unlike 3.

>>379715870
3=1>2

>>379718184
Paid shill detected.