What the fuck was that shit?! Does Nintendo even care about

Why would you make a game for the already selling-out Switch when Pokemon can sell an entirely different console for you? Your fault for having unreasonable expectations

>>379296936

There has never been a mainline Pokemon game for their home console retard.

Yes, the Switch is a home console. It was never advertised as a hybrid or handheld. Get over it, you're not getting a Pokemon game that isn't a spin-off.

>>379296936
Nintendo does not make Pokémon games.

File: uUDEnp7NfdxQ-WLl5uMK9TxqwhkiltkmzIeMvWKjM38.png (282KB, 640x548px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 640x548px

>>379296936
>Thinking Gamefreak would release a mainline Pokemon title on a platform with sub 20 000 000 install base
kek

>>379297140
It is advertised as such in Japan. Also GAMEFREAK is hiring for the switch, don't believe me check their job listings. For a renowned RPG series some more

It will come, no worries

>>379296936
Game Freak isn't Nintendo.
Game Freak is retarded and lazy.

Well E3 is literally around the corner.

File: HZVBZbJ.jpg (22KB, 436x279px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 436x279px

>>379296936
Look there is Pokemon caring about the fucking Switch. Enjoy it because that's all the shits Pokemon will give it.

File: 66289-Pokemon_XD_Gale_of_Darkness-15[1].jpg (130KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1000x668px

>>379297140
except that one time when they tried it

>>379297430
>Cover is Gale of Darkness
>Back of the box is Colosseum

wat

Pokemon "fans" don't know what the fuck they want so the Pokemon Company has to tell them. Faggots won't stop whining about a Pokemon MMO or Pokemon Console game even though the gameplay stands to gain NOTHING from either of those ideas

>>379297249
>Also GAMEFREAK is hiring for the switch, don't believe me check their job listings.

Yes, to make a Pokemon Stadium for the Switch.

File: 1496592257669.jpg (30KB, 225x350px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 225x350px

>>379296936
>port for pokemon tekken that people actually wanted since the wiiu version didn't have croagunk or something
>more mainline games for the 3ds that are going to introduce more pokemon
>GSC for nostalgiababies
Could have gone worse. They could have announced another pokemon rumble or a pokemon go event nobody cares for.
>Does Nintendo even care about the Switch?
They do, but they sure aren't showing it. They probably thought zelda would last a year or two so they can get some more shovelware as opposed to a month

>>379297154
Nintendo owns 30% of tpc

They basically do own pokemon

>>379297283
Can't wait to play another fuzzy, pixely, 5FPS Pokemon game.

>>379298065
>GSC
>C

i'm afraid Game Freak has been dumber than you expected

>>379297129
This statement is beyond retarded. The 3DS already had 3 mainline Pokemon games, another one won't sell as much consoles as there were already 3 chances for consumers to buy into it and the new mainline game is just a special version of sun and moon, it will move even less consoles.

On the switch the impact of a mainline game would have been tremendous.

File: Switch.png (409KB, 621x424px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 621x424px

>>379296936

Et Tu, TPC?

File: 2.png (41KB, 1036x234px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1036x234px

>>379296936
Anyone who expected a mainline game on the Switch this soon is an underage retard.

Do people actually care about Pokken?

I can't what tell a 3DS successor is announced this E3. Post like this will stop existing.

>>379298065
>They probably thought zelda would last a year or two so they can get some more shovelware as opposed to a month
You say this as if there weren't already several Switch exclusives coming out in the following months.

>>379298728

More than there are people who care about you.

/face

>>379296936
well, they did say it was going to be their debut, meaning that they probably have more. most likely a ultra luna or ultra sun port, but they can't announce it or they will kill the 3DS version.

>>379297283
Didn't notice this

File: ITS FUCKING BURMY.png (559KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1280x1280px

>>379298329
>release date is still months away
>you could emulate and complete every gameboy pokemon game in that time
>they didn't even port all three games
nintendo is actually braindead
>>379298845
go on mate post the image
a small number of underwhelming exclusives won't boost switch sales

>>379299031
I don't need to post any image. You need to post however many juicy exclusives Sony or Microsoft had within the first year of their respective launch, and then explain why Nintendo should be held to a different standard. Also
>a small number of underwhelming exclusives won't boost switch sales
So they're going to be underwhelming because you say so? Fascinating. The Switch hardly needs any boost in sales, the only thing that is slowing it down is that not enough units are being manufactured.

Finally
>nintendo is actually braindead
Game Freaks manages the Pokémon games. Nintendo can't do jack shit about it.

>>379297249
They announced this before the Switch was even on the market. They said it won't last beyond May of 2018. Sounds like a good idea to kill of the 3DS when they can get 15 million sales for it and develop for system they weren't even sure would catch on at the timw. Logic.

>>379299529
Funny, I remember the exact same arguments being made in favor of a new DS game right before X and Y were announced.

Actually, the situation is uncannily similar:
>Diamond/Pearl - X/Y are the first games to come on the system
>Black/White - Sun/Moon are the unexpected new entry on the same system
>Black 2/White 2 - Ultra Sun/Ultra Moon still on the same system when everybody was expecting them to jump to the newly established system
>people start arguing that it's "not logical" to move on because the old platform has a better install base

>>379300121
>similar

They are doing the same thing.

>>379299443
The big three should be held to the same standards. And they are all doing terribly actually releasing games for their consoles.

>>379301042
That's an entirely different argument.

>>379300121
Yeah but you didn't factor in Switch is a home console not a portable.

>>379301635
The Switch is factually portable. There's no reason for Game Freaks to avoid it. Whether the Switch fits into meaningless, volatile definitions is completely irrelevant.

>>379302398
>Denial
what is it with Switch owners thinking they bought the 3DS successor?

>>379296936
Game Freak has never readied a Pokemon game within a year of a console's launch. It's always taken two years, and they always release one last game for the current generation when the next console is still fresh. This happens every time, and people act shocked every time.

Crystal didn't mean Game Freak was ignoring the Game Boy Advance. Emerald didn't mean Game Freak was ignoring the DS. Black 2 and White 2 didn't mean Game Freak was ignoring the 3DS.

File: 1488730229245.jpg (51KB, 232x269px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 232x269px

>>379296936
>nintendies buy tablet even though all it has is amiibos and ports
>surprised when nintendo continues to produce nothing but amiibos and ports

why would they invest time and money when toddlers give them free autism bucks with zero effort?

>>379300121
It is uncannily similar, right down to the delicious salt from early adopters. Do you really expect Gamefreak to split up a gen between two platforms?

Why would anyone pay for this new pokemon anyway?