>Sony won again today without even doing anything That's

File: 1487770032898.jpg (19KB, 144x151px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 144x151px

>>379279050
>never owned a PS3
>owned a Wii, Wii U and 3DS
>Bought a PS4 in 2014 and enjoyed the PS3 ports as well as the new games
>/v/ tries tell me I'm not allowed to enjoy those ports because they were on PS3
>at the same time, /v/ goes crazy any time a Wii U port gets announced for Switch
>/v/ tries to justify it by desperately screaming "NO ONE OWNED A WII U!!!"
I don't see why people dislike Sony. They're not anymore jewish than the other companies.

>TPC/GameFreak continue with cookie-cutter rehashes to nobody's surprise
>"NINTENDOOMED" "SONY WON" "IT'S OVER BEFORE E3 STARTED LMAO"

>>379279285
I'm confused over why you're okay with PS3 ports on PS4 but not Wii U ports on Switch, what's with the double-standard?

File: 1490457944443.jpg (199KB, 711x1080px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 711x1080px

>mfw PS4's early 2017

top tier desu

Wipeout Omega out today too

>>379279429
I never owned a PS3 so they're new games to me.

>>379279050
i guess this means there wont be a PSP3 announcement next week. sad :(

>>379279429
everyone shit on Sony for that

now everyone is shitting on Nintendo

there isn't a problem friendo, unless you have some

>>379279050
If that was 400 bucks it'd be swell.

If that pos had backwards compatibility it'd have sold better than the PS2.

>PSN Posts.
Nah fuck that.

>>379279494
same can be said about ports on the Switch, though?
>>379279576
the way his post was written made it sound like Wii U ports are a bad thing but PS3 ports were a good thing.

You lack reading comprehension.

>>379279285
Nice try sonybro.

Why do you fucking nerds feel so much attachment to these multibillion dollar companies who don't give a shit about you and just want your money?

>>379279050
>60 million people already own a ps4
>no one owns a vita
>how do we sell more vitas?
>bundle it with ps4

???

>>379279285
/v/ is full of blind fanboys that try to push a console war in every thread.

If you enjoyed a port of a PS3 game on your PS4 there's nothing wrong with it, same as if you enjoy a Wii U port on your Switch.

>saw how insanely inflated Uncharted 4s sales were when bundled with cheap PS4
>"Hey let's bundle Vitas in a cheap bundle to artificially inflate Vita sales so it won't look like so much of a failure"

Vita sales are going to go up like 5/10 million magically now

>>379279050
So that's how they're getting rid of OG playstations.

>>379279848
that was a launch bundle in Europe

>>379279848
>>379279550
It's from the before ps4 was released

>>379279826
Do you want me to post my Wii U and games?
>>379279682
>same can be said about ports on the Switch
I'm aware. The difference here is that most of /v/ wasn't okay with the PS4 getting ports but are happy for the Switch to get ports.

>>379280124
>most of /v/ wasn't okay with the PS4 getting ports but are happy for the Switch to get ports.
are you sure about that? there's like 20 threads right now complaining there's too many Wii U ports on Switch.

>>379279285
I basically only own the Sony ecosystem of games and boy howdy do they still piss me off.

The mistreatment of my Vita-chan alone is enough.

>>379280124
>but are happy for the Switch to get ports.
They are beyond happy and continuously beg for ports in many threads. Which would be fine if those people wouldn't have been shitposting so fucking much when that happens to ps and pc.

>>379280232
You are right, the tons and tons of post magically didn't happen because a fag made a single thread to complain about it. Stop being so fucking dishonest, nobody is paying you to act like a brainless cheerleader, you know.
Inb4 another load of embarrassing nonsense.

>>379280593
>Which would be fine if those people wouldn't have been shitposting so fucking much when that happens to ps and pc.
Yeah agreed. I wouldn't care about it if they hadn't shitposted so much when the other systems get ported.

File: image.jpg (139KB, 960x544px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 960x544px

>>379280464
Yeah it's rough for Vita users, but unless you've played the 100+ good/great games it has, then there's a ton of backlog to catch up on

>>379280593
>You are right, the tons and tons of post magically didn't happen because a fag made a single thread to complain about it. Stop being so fucking dishonest, nobody is paying you to act like a brainless cheerleader, you know.
>Inb4 another load of embarrassing nonsense.
where the fuck did all this come from? I've got no clue what you're even ranting on about honestly

>>379280027
>>379280076
so wait
then what does the OP have to do with anything?

>>379280728
any good vita exclusives?

>>379280839
It's a thing that was called "trolling", then newfags turned that term into "baiting" because fresh meme always taste better for them. I wonder if the next newfags will use another term.

>>379280758
Not him but you don't seem to understand that there is a very large portion of /v/'s userbase who simultaneously holds the belief that PS3 ports on PS4 are bad but Wii U ports on Switch are good, and they justify it by saying "no one bought a Wii U"
Either all the ports are okay or none of them are

>>379281091
>there is a very large portion of /v/'s userbase who simultaneously holds the belief that PS3 ports on PS4 are bad but Wii U ports on Switch are good
where?
as I've never seen any single anon say such a retarded thing.

>>379280728
I must admit that playing those games on handheld would be pretty comfy, but let's be honest, the vita is in a terrible state.

>>379281091
The exact same goes for ps4 fanboys, the system was nothing but perts for years and NOW it's bad that nintendo ports games

it's a double standard that only fuels console wars

>>379281350
If someone points out the hypocrisy of the whole port situation, the immediate first reply is always "no one owned a Wii U so it's different"

>>379281806
>If someone points out the hypocrisy of the whole port situation, the immediate first reply is always "no one owned a Wii U so it's different"
I want you to find me one example of this having happened
>INB4 you post one yourself right now in another thread

>>379282005
>>379279664

PS Vita is dead

>>379282419
he's not bashing PS3 ports on PS4 nor Wii U ports on Switch, he's just asking if it really matters. What's wrong with that viewpoint?

>>379281041

Tales of Heart R

>>379282670
He said "for most gamers." If he was asked about PS4 ports he would say "PS3 sold a lot so those ports are bad"

>>379283157
>If he was asked about PS4 ports he would say "PS3 sold a lot so those ports are bad"
nice assumption faggot, you don't know what he would've said in response to that.

>>379283275
No, he put the justification "its new to most gamers" because he knew it would be compared to PS4 ports.

>>379283753
how do you know that?
I didn't read his post that way at all. Honestly I think you just have confirmation bias here, you're really reaching by this point.

File: Dick.jpg (78KB, 300x434px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 300x434px

>>379279050
>console with 2-3 good games
>console with literally 0 games
HOLY SHIT WHERE CAN I BUY THIS

>>379279285
DELEEEEEEEEEEEEETE THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS

>>379280464
How are they mistreating it? Tons of games are being released. Is it because Sony themselves aren't making games for it?

>>379279050
Is Vita that much of a failure that Sony is forcing potential PS4 buyers to pay for the Vita too (that most probably don't want anyways)? It's the Xbone Kinect all over again.

>>379279285
Because there are so much non-game shovelware billed as AAA to get max shekels. And now, they're bundling Vita because they're so desperate to get rid of their years-old inventory and not losing any shekels. They could've just buried it on some desert, like how Atari did with their ET cartridges, because that's where Vita belongs. But no. That's pretty Jewish.

>>379279429
Because the PS3 games that usually gets ported to the PS4 are not shovelware.