So I've played MGS1, 2, and 3 (2 and 3 on the remaster so

>>379232683
Yes, there's Kojima shit in it. Yes, it's worth playing.

4 is worth playing even at its shittiest.

>>379232683
It's worth playing.

File: Decline-of-MGS.jpg (3MB, 1512x5411px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1512x5411px

>>379232683
4 is an absolute travesty to the series in terms of plot however it has the best final boss in a video game.

>>379232683
It's a fun ride anon, play it already.

>I liked MGS2

hahaha, buckle up then, buttercup

4 is made especially for you

>>379232683
Play just for the end sequence, it's too god damn good.

File: 1473207986643.jpg (13KB, 225x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 225x360px

Play it anon, you'll like. And if you don't wanna any disappointment, don't play MGSV

>>379232683
why don't you just play for yourself and find out?

to answer your question though, it is pretty heavy on cutscenes. the game is substantially longer than MGS2, but the ratio of cutscene to gameplay is about the same - slightly larger.

>>379233360
Dude MGS4 was fucking lit

>>379232683
It's terrible and uses every game before it as a crutch while pandering so heavily you'd think kojima stole someone's fanfic from deviant art. But it has some cool ass moments between a bunch of awful ones. It's worth playing because the contrast between it and mgs 5 is fascinating to witness. Mgs v is a huge departure from the norms of the series, it goes against the grain in almost every way possible except for the fact that cassettes present the story and its nonstop exposition to an autistic degree as usual. It's worth playing, opinions on quality aside, it's a nice technical leap forward from 3 and it's worth playing at least once. The whole series is, really.

>>379232683
I thought it was pretty enjoyable, gameplay is really good. As for the cutscenes, just get something to eat and sit yourself down to watch a movie, more or less.
Thankfully everything is skippable on repeat playthroughs.