How many hours must you play a game in order to get your money's

>>378728952
depends on genre

I'd settle for 1 or 2, video games can't really hold my attention anymore.

I'm usually content with 30 hours for most games, but it can't be fluff and grinding.

>>378728952
I'd say 40 hours is a good standard. Souls/Witcher take about the same time for a first playthrough.

>>378729062
This.
And the whole concept of "money's worth" is also subjective. I'm very frugal so I have to get countless hours of anything above 30.

Games are like $80 in Canada so I would say 160 hours.

1600+ hours

10 to 20 is more than enough for a $50 game.
Anyone who plays those autistic as fuck +800 hours jrpgs needs to set their priorities fucking straight.

>>378729062
>>378729138
This and this.

If it's an experience you desperately thirst for then price becomes irrelevant.

>>378728952
50? probably over the span of one or two months

>>378728952
At this point if it manages to holy my attention long enough to finish it it's worth it.

>>378728952
10x the time I had to work for it.

>25 an hour.
>30 dollar game
>better be at least 10 hours plus a little more.

File: where do you think we are.png (936KB, 644x644px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 644x644px

>>378729203

I'd expect a hundred at least. Not in terms of content though, just in terms of the game actually being challenging/deep/fun enough to play for that long. Don't care if it has only an hour of content.