>video games will never reach this level of detail in your

>>378193238
who cares?

graphics don't matter

I hate graphicsn****rs so much.

Consoles.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LlUy-Qbvhzs/hqdefault.jpg

Did you make this post before? If so, I remember you getting a good response explaining its too detailed and would be impractical. Fuck off.

>>378193421

>graphics don't matter

End this fucking meme right now. Graphics are a vital part of gameplay, storytelling, character development, and more. They most certainly do fucking matter.

>>378193238
Why do you show your autism by making the same thread daily?

>>378193728
>storytelling
fuck off storyn****r

>>378193238
Why is something that is completely prerendered graphically superior to something that has to be rendered in real time? Good question, OP. You sound like a smart guy.

To respond to your stupid statement, unless you are in your 60s video game graphics will probably reach that level in your life time. But prerendered cgi will look even better by that point so you can make a new thread then anyway (:

>>378193238
Good. The last thing we need is more furshit characters.

>>378193728
Play any atari 2600 game right now you dumb grafics nigger

>>378193238
If you made a big budget game of nothing but pre-rendered cutscenes they'd look closer to that, although it'd be little more than a interactive DVD.

>>378193238
Because rendering that in real time takes processing power that we just don't have yet. That single render you posted takes 8 hours, rendering Rocket in the entire movie takes several thousand hours. Trying to rotate the render would make most computers shit themselves.

Get back to me once graphic cards can do this render level in real time, 60 or greater fps AND not have the graphics card melt.

Until Dawn

>video games will never reach this level of detail in your lifetime

says who exactly?

>>378193728
That may be, but they aren't the most important thing. That would be functionality or gameplay.

File: TLG_E315_06_1434429409.jpg (422KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 1920x1080px

>>378193238

>>378194004
That reminds me of the glory days of adventure games like Myst and Zork. Pre-rendered backgrounds, real life actors. Made the games look incredible, while also not taking barely any processing power at all. Too bad adventure genre is pretty much dead, with VR there could have been an incredible combination.

>>378193984
They're unplayable now. What's your point?

Daily reminder video games still haven't surpassed TOY STORY, a movie made 20 years ago.

This is why video games will never be considered art.

>>378193728
They don't matter to the extent that SO SHINY takes precedence over the rest of the game's budget. To hell with super-realism, just get some good artists.

>>378193505
>>378193918
>n****r

Did you just come here from reddit? You dumb nigger.

>>378193238
If you want an honest answer? It's because consoles hold everything back. Though, I do a game that a game can very easily be low-poly and still be very enjoyable: like Katamari Damacy, or Bravely Default.

>>378193238
Aesthetic > Realism

>>378193238
Rocket is cute, CUTE!

>>378193238
>tfw Best Husbando will never be real.

>>378194164
That's not even fucking close, buddy.

File: rocket raccoon24.jpg (167KB, 997x1337px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 997x1337px

>>378193238
if I see that fucking raccoon one more time..

>>378193962
>unless you are in your 60s video game graphics will probably reach that level in your life time.
Unlikely. Consoles will still be the primary platform forever, and if the switch is any indication the future of consoles seems to be lower spec, higher cost.

>>378193238
They will though

>>378193238
just shove a bunch of prerendered FMVs in your game, not like anyone will notice

>>378193238
Ratchet and Clank is already close to that, just a different art style. Infamous got alot right despite the art style. Uncharted 4 is up there with Crysis 3 as best looking games ever made.

We're at most two gens from that if devs so choose.

>inb4 sonyshill
The games aren't always great but damn if internal studios don't pull some impressive shit.

>>378194536
>to the extent that SO SHINY takes precedence over the rest of the game's budget.
It doesn't though, you retard. Making a game look better costs nothing compared to:
>sticking the game's logo on buses
>sticking the main female on the side of a building in LA
>making a giant robot statue in a major shopping center
>getting a former beatle to write a song for the commercials
>getting a celebrity midget to read lines off the script in a bored monotone
>getting a frozen yogurt chain to name flavours after your characters
>sticking a character's face on top of mall paper towel dispensers
et cetera.

>>378195319
>Uncharted 4 is up there with Crysis 3 as best looking games ever made.
The resolution is tiny and the framerate is low and even then it looks like a camera smeared in vaselline, what on earth are you smoking

>>378193238
The industry is dieing because of the graphical arms race that occurred last gen take a look around 80 percent of triple a developers died last gen.

>>378194105
Hello, I am a fellow gamer and it is my opinion that graphics are more important. Now, which one of our opinions holds more weight?

are you honestly asking? Because the image you posted isn't being rendered in real time. Each frame probably takes about 5 minutes to fully render. So they get like 60 computers to render a single second every five minutes. Which is 5 hours for a single minute of CGI footage.

>>378193238
>video games will never reach this level of detail in your lifetime
Yeah, because that's what the games are lacking lacking most.
Not great stories, good AI, engaging game play and content that's not copy pasted samey shit or 'collect 200/300/400/500 pieces of this shit from all over the map'.

>>378195513
>retarded hyperbole hits you for 100000000 HP
>you are dead

>>378193728
Don't bother, anon. Anyone that thinks they don't matter isn't even a human. They'd probably say that the graphics in their own dreams don't matter either.

>>378193728
why is dwarf fortress my favorite game then

File: toy-story.jpg (28KB, 615x344px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 615x344px

>>378193238
>video games will never reach this level of detail in your lifetime

Why is the games industry so far behind compared to everyone else? What went wrong?

File: 1495155582661.jpg (60KB, 1014x1024px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1014x1024px

>comparing real-time gameplay to pre-rendered multi-million dollar blockbusters

>>378193728
Aesthetic and art direction matter. Graphical fidelity is nice, but it takes a back seat.

>>378198398
>multi-million dollar blockbusters
you say that as if the video game industry wasn't two times bigger than the film industry

>>378198502
Why do you want your video games to be movies annon?

>>378198347
Because it is STILL filled with fascists and white men, not like there is much difference between the two anyway. Thankfully, many studios are trying to fix that.

File: Toystory1.jpg (103KB, 700x340px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 700x340px

>>378193238
>1996
>video games will never reach this level of detail in your lifetime

>>378198502
Are you fucking crazy or uninformed?

>>378198742
But he's right, vidya is currently the worlds biggest entertainment industry - beating music and movies.

>>378198584
I don't think I ever said I did want that anon.
>>378198742
Worldwide box-office revenue for the film industry in 2013 was $35.9 billion (source Theatrical Market Statistics 2013).

Worldwide revenue for the video game industry in 2013 was $70.4 billion (source: 2013 Global Games Market Report).

Are you?

Have you fucking seen the level of detail on some of the character's faces during cutscenes in Nioh?
It's insane and still blows me away.

File: 180.jpg (216KB, 1280x675px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1280x675px

>>378193238
Even real raccoons don't look as cute as Rocket.

File: DAhKjOSXYAMtO8o.jpg (198KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1200x1200px

>>378195159
Sau-

Oh nevermind it was actually pretty easy to find.

File: 1363155965204.gif (486KB, 475x347px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 475x347px

>>378193238
This has to be bait.
Real time graphics Vs Non-real time is a big difference.

Fucking physics and AI haven't advanced much further compared to Real time graphics in the last 8 years.

>>378193238

Is this the new Toy Story like graphics?

>>378197621
they just dont get it

Rocket Raccoon game when?
>Tfw they don't make comfy arcade games after movies like they used to do with HP and the Philosopher's Stone.

what do you think rockets paws smell like haha

File: 2b60f5061edfd7c7ab25f911e6bf6b5d-d7n1jc2.jpg (380KB, 746x1000px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 746x1000px

>>378200505
UMvC3 is the only game to make a good looking Rocket Raccoon.

4's looks like crap.

How long until they make a Red Panda rival version of him to shill by Marvel?

>>378199656
I work with animals, real raccoons are fat, disgusting monsters incapable of love or affection for anything including their own young. They're vile little beasts that constantly cause problems.

Opossum are better. They're ugly but entirely harmless, can't spread rabies and keep the tick population down, and don't attack people.

>>378195187
>the switch
Concoles don't follow Nintendo and their failing direction

File: toy-story.png (1MB, 1067x600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1067x600px

>video games will never reach this level of detail in your lifetime

Why is the games industry so far behind compared to everyone else? What went wrong?

>>378193238
They already did. Final Fantasy Spirits Within had great graphics.

File: 1419111006280.jpg (302KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 960x1280px

>>378201215
Hey fuck you.

>>378193238
what is Conkers bad fur day.
/THREAD

>>378193971
you know you love this shit

File: ga5g.jpg (695KB, 794x1825px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 794x1825px

>>378193971
>calling this qt shit

What the fuck is wrong with this planet

>>378198502
You say that as if you missed the key parts of his post: "real-time gameplay" and "pre-rendered."

The larger size of the video game industry doesn't mean hardware can generate real-time imagery on par with pre-rendered multi-million dollar blockbuster computer graphics. Retard.

>>378198901
You too.

>>378201564

Why do Raccoons constantly rub their hands together? What did God mean by this?

>>378201215
they're not that bad

forced domestication does that to most animals

File: Guardians-of-the-Galaxy-Telltale-Shot--(6).jpg (264KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1920x1080px

I'm just reminded of how terrible RR looks in Telltale's GOTG.
Everything looks terrible visually in it in general, the fuck happened with their art team?

>>378195187
>and if the switch is any indication the future of consoles seems to be lower spec, higher cost.
you mean, portable gaming?

Real time graphics will never be as good as rendered graphics. A single frame of CGI in movies takes hours to render. That's why movies now take a year just for special effects and editing.

File: cab29f52210b601429cbb75a8345a38b.jpg (44KB, 428x640px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 428x640px

>>378195159
What kind of a name is Analockman?

>>378193238
cause, for videogames with graphic like this, you need a 1 billion nasa supermachine, and even then, you only get 10 FPS

>>378204450

i wanna hold his wittle hand and give him a kiss on the nose

>>378193238
We haven't had graphics since 2007 - thanks to you subhuman console cunts. No, seriously - thanks a fucking ton! You're really enouraging the industry to progress past cellphone level - for real! PS4 should be almost on par with the Galaxy S7 soon!

FUCK YOU

>>378205454
Crysis didn't even age that well

>>378193238

you do understand the difference between real-time rendering and pre-rendering right?

>>378194870
***k off

>>378205741

Be q***t you moron

>>378201435
Man toy story has not aged well.

>>378205150
You do know raccoons are aggressive unless you raise it yourself at birth right?

>>378193708
Rockyfag makes this thread every week

File: 1495292160221.png (23KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 370x370px

>>378206641
No, fu****ck you.

>>378206746

he's reaching out for a wittle lil hug what are you talking about

>>378206641
Don't tell me to be q***t you piece of shit

>>378206948
Hey if you wanna get rabies and tetanus be my guest.

>>378193238
>Why is the games industry so far behind compared to everyone else? What went wrong?
>video games have their output rendered at 30/60/whatever frames per second
>meanwhile in the movie world, rendering simple few seconds cgi sequence may take up days
it's not about level of detail, it's about a compromise between detail and real time rendering

>>378193728
A great story can still be told with subpar graphics, as long as the presentation of those graphics is well done.

>>378193238
because you have too high expectations and have no idea how to produce a video game

File: 1278313125.jpg (12KB, 239x196px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 239x196px

>>378193728
>graphics are a vital part of gameplay, storytelling and character development

I think you're confusing graphics with visuals.

>you will never cum inside Rocket

YOU (you) want to fuck THAT racoon???

playing at < 1 frame a second is not fun

@378209795
You don't?

>>378209864
Why did you deny me my (you)?

File: Paragorns backstory.jpg (782KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

782KB, 1920x1080px

>>378193238
We're getting there

File: Analogman_Software.png (4KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 320x240px

>>378204450
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_Ge2rSkLDg

@378209986
:^)

@378209986
choke on it

>>378195187
the switch is a portable nigga. Even looking at the switch, comparison with the 3DS actually emphasises the likelihood of those graphics being reached even more!

Is it so wrong to want to see Rocket trying to take 8 inches of thick hard human dick

>>378193708
It's a new copy paste to bait weaklings

>>378193238
It's not. Video game cinematics are made with the same degree film studios make theirs with. In game is different than a film, because rather than just being animations, there's code, other assets, object interactivity and many other factors that affect it.

If movies had that level of depth that video games do, then they would look a lot more like shit. Keep in mind most movies are still 24fps and games coming out now are majority 60fps.

So don't be a complete retard. A cinematic is not the same as in-game gameplay.

>>378209864
>>378210291
>>378210424
get out newfag

>>378211138
It's copy pasta to bait furfags, but they're not biting.

File: low quality Todd.jpg (22KB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 360x270px

>>378193238
How old are you?!

Vidya will look like this in 15 years.

>>378194368
If you honestly believe that, you're smoking crack and you need to stop bc it's making you stupid.

>>378211270
>In game is different than a film, because rather than just being animations, there's code, other assets, object interactivity and many other factors that affect it.

This is some serious bullshit trying to sound knowledgeable. Stop.

The main reason why games today don't deliver as much graphic detail is because to get to that level the processing power necessary to show those graphics in real time is ridiculously high and would take hours to render with the current processing power of basically all gaming equipment currently available in the market. Games are interactive and having the lowest lag between input and graphics reaction is key to deliver a proper experience meanwhile a movie producer can order a professional studio to take a grid of powerful pcs that in a few days will invest all their power to solely render a single scene which will then be compressed for distribution.

>>378193728
>Graphics are a vital part of gameplay, storytelling, character development, and more.
That's why I keep trying to tell my teacher that video games>books but she just won't listen.

>>378211029
yes whats next you want to see his little stomach inflate with cum you disgust me