Is manufactured controversy to shill and sell games when in reality

>>377936436
no its more like reddit jumping at the chance to shitpost about triggered white men

Don't underestimate viral marketing.

Whats the controversy?

so here's something I don't understand: are foot fetishists sexually attracted to their own feet? if not, why not?

>>377936436
Nobody is actually triggered, it's all false flags, trolls, and marketers trying to drum up controversy so anons buy it to spite /v/.

/v/ is ironically shilling for free, of course.
really makes you think when you see like 10 threads about Farcr5 a week after you were seeing 10 threads all the time for PREY and before that 10 threads about whatever piece of shit it was.

>>377936436
I personally don't give a shit. I wonder how many people actually give a shit as opposed to people who give a shit about /pol/ sensitivity and SJW shit, or even giving a fuck to begin with.

Someone should make a strawpoll but i just don't give a fuck.

File: 1246474818265.jpg (63KB, 554x439px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 554x439px

>>377936657

The imaginary controversy is the controversy.
It's fucking pathetic.

This is par for the course /pol/ behavior and has been for a long time. Happens every single time a TV show/video game/movie/tweet comes out that triggers them.

>>377936736
Gays aren't attracted to themselves either, anon.
It just doesn't work that way.

>>377936436
Newfriends won't remember but it was exactly the same type of shilling tactic for FC4 when people though Pagan Minh was white

>>377936921
but why? what prevents it?

>>377936736
Are you sexually attracted to your own dick? If not, why are you on /v/?

File: 1484952220086.jpg (73KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x800px

no one cares, far cry is like your dad´s open world shooter

>>377936996
i'm not sexually attracted to dicks at all, so the comparison doesn't hold

>>377937098
>i'm not sexually attracted to dicks at all
What are you, some kind of faggot?

File: 1274969181873.jpg (13KB, 402x298px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 402x298px

>>377936991

Well now that I think about it there are those who record themselves jerking off and then jerk off to the footage, so I guess it is possible.

But the whole point of the foot fetish is being sexually attracted to other people's feet, not your own. Although with the aforementioned point, I guess you can't rule out weirdos masturbating to their own feet.

what i hate is that every avenue of media, news, op-eds, music,tv, movies, even sports (espn) and now apparently vidya spend all day shitting on conservatives and white people, i dont know how much i can blame them, because white conservatives are the only "safe" target for hate nowadays, even after muslim terrorist attacks, you see op-eds shitting on right wing people being racist as teh real cause of the attacks. Im just fucking sick of it at this point, ive pretty much stopped watching tv outside of syndicated shows I like and live sporting events, I need an escape, its nice to have vidyahj

>>377936921
>Gays aren't attracted to themselves
:^)

File: 1476826178818.gif (1MB, 300x191px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x191px

>>377937246
>there are those who record themselves jerking off and then jerk off to the footage

>>377936436
Actually, it's manufactured controversy to make right wingers look like SJWs through false flagging.

>>377936848

Yeah but ubi knew this would cause an imaginary controversy.

>>377936876
>This is par for the course /pol/ behavior and has been for a long time. Happens every single time a TV show/video game/movie/tweet comes out that triggers them.
Marketers actually, genius. /pol/ doesn't play games and they don't care.

File: 1483499044488.png (1MB, 1587x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1587x1600px

>japanese game has female protagonist
>no one cares
>american game has female protagonist
>pic related

File: 1247447836435.jpg (13KB, 304x332px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 304x332px

>>377937097

This. So much.
Controversial marketing isn't something new.

>>377936876
/pol/ hates video games and views it as degeneracy.

File: 1476333013659.png (84KB, 4000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 4000x4000px

>>377937447
because japs don't make man-faced women
>>377937494
Remember Dante's inferno controversy? Manufactured by EA

>>377936436
whenever you see a new game announced with multiple threads, especially with the same image, hide them and don't post
every bump you give them is free advertisement to page 1, which a decent amount of people just sit at refresh

File: pol doesnt care, nothing to see here.png (910KB, 1222x865px) Image search: [Google]

910KB, 1222x865px

>>377937538
>>377937441
>/pol/ doesn't play games and they don't care.

File: 1453603826450.jpg (26KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 250x250px

>>377938005
>go to these threads
>it's filled with "Who gives a shit about video games?" and "go back to /v/"

well well well

>>377936436
Yes manufactured controversy exists, I believe GTA 3 or one of the earlier GTA titles had paid journalists to cause a stir at how violent it was

File: poly ticks.png (92KB, 966x278px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 966x278px

>>377938272

>>377938005
Read the post encircled at the top of your pick.
The marketer links their own article and quotes their own statement from it in THEIR OWN marketing shill post on fucking /pol/. The exact same pictures witch the exact same res and file size in the other two..
You can sit there and piss and moan about muh /pol/ boogyman all you want but it's not going to change the fact that these are marketers and shills. You're just burying your head in the sand m8.

>>377937447
>your entire post
>also pic related

File: 43562773443.png (11KB, 120x152px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 120x152px

>>377939068
>go to that thread
>usual replies like "who cares?" and ">he plays video games"

keep going

File: we dont care about any of this.png (53KB, 955x828px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 955x828px

>>377939114
look at all of these people on /pol/ who don't give a shit about any of this. nothing says "we don't care" quite like multiple hundred-post threads, with posts like this taking this shit 100% seriously

>>377937097
Im actually getting into marketing as a career

This post is shit any layman could tell you, but the fact is that it can use some cold methodology, and it works on you sheep like a charm

>>377937370
That's eye opening. I only suspected it. But this might be what's going on.

They know that the right don't lose so easily and are silent. So they bait the left by pretending to be right. It seems rather soulless and disrespectful.

>>377939271
I kept going:
>>377939296

>>377939114
>links their own article
>quotes their own statement

Evidence? You /pol/yps are truly reprehensibly stupid people, the worst I've ever seen. Something isn't true just because you say it is, and then repeat it over and over, you fucking chimp.

>>377939296
>3 replies
>one of them is a leaf

yes yes this is the entirety of /pol/. totally convinced

File: promise we dont care.png (49KB, 964x404px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 964x404px

>>377939519
I can keep doing this all day

>>377936436
Yes. And this fc5 threads are shill threads. The description are to objective

File: 1485986678215.jpg (48KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x500px

>>377937097
No wonder everything new that comes out makes me feel miserable and hate the world even more. Thanks advertisers! You made me lose faith in humanity yet again.