>Not having a 8k Gayman Mencuckor What are you? CIS htt

What the fuck games am I going to be running in 8k?

None

I don't see the reason to have more than 4K on a 23' monitor. Even at 4k it's not like you need any AA at that size...

>>377655249
But your eyes can't even see better than 1080p

>>377655356
its for content creation and video tasks more

Nothing could run it at 8k 60hz though, nothing.

Not even SLI titan x pascal
>>377655481
over 25" and sitting close to the screen i certainly can, get your eyes checked and stop regurgitating 10 year old memes, it wasnt funny then its still not funny now

>>377655572
I'm sorry I'll close your thread now

>only recently got 1080p for the first time
>have yet to know what's 4K and above

why everything is going so fast when it comes to screen resolution now?

>>377656169
i had 1600x1200 fucking 14 years ago wtf are you doing lel

4K is still a meme

>>377655572
I don't make videos though

I like playing video games, not showing my friends online that I did.

>>377656393
if you watched numale cuck tips video he said that the nvidia driver immediately crashes when he tries to play games.

File: 1490493381089.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>377656169
This, I got my first 1080p monitor last fucking year after taking the leap from 1366x768 for fucking ages.

Things are going too fast, make it stop.

File: 1489421317547.png (300KB, 460x430px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 460x430px

>>377656279
uhhh anon, you realize 1080p is a higher resolution than that right?

File: 2015-03-04_15-33-25_0.jpg (3MB, 7680x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 7680x4320px

>>377655356
Depends on your hardware.
This old game ran at 12FPS on a GTX 970 on QUHD resolution.

>>377656479
1080p is fine for gaming but you need some sort of decent AA which most games lack and then your only option is supersampling otherwise your left with a very muddy image.
>>377656532
WRONG

1920x1080 = 2.073.600
1600x1200 = 1.920.000

Hence 1080p has roughly 6% more pixels than 1600x1200.

File: 1492054634281.gif (1MB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x500px

>>377656532
Uh.. 1600 is a bigger number than 1080 you idiot..

>>377656279
I had 2048*1536 back in 2001, resolutions took a complete stop when TFT monitors came because they had way lower resolution and such a horrid input lag, but everyone had to have a TFT so bad.

>>377656446
>if you watched numale cuck tips video
Of course I didn't, I'm not giving views to some shitter on youtube shilling gear that nobody on earth needs

File: 1492604562926.png (106KB, 330x321px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 330x321px

>>377656660
>wrong
>1080p has only 6% more pixels
>which means it's not a higher resolution
>than the thing it has 6% more pixels than

Anon
Did you actually read your own post?

>>377656772
i did so you didnt have to and its basically useless for games even though it has good response times

infamous shitty nvidiot drivers strike again!

i also get a feeling 11gb of vram isnt enough for 8k 60hz either considering 4k can easily take up that much ram

>>377655249

Imagine trying to talk like this guy all day.

>>377656884
so shilly and happy

reeeeeeeeeee

>>377655249
wow. that's freaking amazeballs.

When do you guys think 8K will become the norm just like 4K is now?

File: 1490388823654.png (271KB, 499x425px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 499x425px

>>377655249
This autistic meme Canadian has an obnoxious voice.

Can I get a review of this monitor from a person that isn't fucking annoying?

>>377657032
4k isn't even the norm yet, it's shifting into the norm.
4k will be the norm in about 3-4 years. 8k will be the norm in 10 or so years.

File: e829cbf6562470f586ac3151c3428b84_bedroom-eyes-know-your-meme-pooh-reading-meme_720-400.jpg (49KB, 720x400px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 720x400px

>trying to convey how impressive an extremely high resolution monitor is
>while everyone watching it is on a lower max resolution

>>377657181
4K has been the norm for the last 5 years poorfag...

>>377657547
Name two consumer cards that can get consistent 60 fps 4k max settings without sli

>Not playing at 540p just so you can reach 2000fps

>>377657639
GTX 1050, HD 4850

>>377656446
Are you talking about Linus? He got Crysis 3 running at like sub 10FPS with some whacky 4 monitor setup. The game actually did let him select the proper resolution though.

>>377657696
>>377657547
Something doesn't match up here... hm.

File: 1494470808123.jpg (36KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x460px

>>377655249

Eh, I'm fine with 1440p @96hz

I might do 4k in the future, in that video you linked Linus admits you can't really game on it since 95% of games freak out and crash at 8k. Most GPUs have trouble pushing that much bandwidth (33megapixels 60 times a second) and the 2 cable thing like early 4k monitors is ok for productivity work but doesn't work for games

>>377655249

I just want 144hz for games where I can actually get that framerate (or close to it.)

>>377655249
>6ms
Garbage.

>>377655249
>8k
>turnsa on AA

>>377660664
you cant tell the difference between 1ms and 6ms
Stop complaining