If video games are art, why hasn't any video game sold for

>Sell 1 game for only 100 million or sell a 100 million or more games instead at a certain price
Really makes me think.

Why does something's price determine whether or not it's art?

File: 1314712131621.jpg (661KB, 958x775px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 958x775px

http://www.artnews.com/2017/05/18/record-breaking-110-5-m-basquiat-shocks-attendees-at-sothebys-319-2-m-postwar-and-contemporary-evening-sale/
This is art, goy, you're just too dumb to understand.

That's like asking why that movie on Blu-Ray disc over there isn't selling for $100 mil.

minecraft sold for 2 billions it's clearly a higher for of art than Mona Lisa

Art is still considered a child's hobby. Once the older generations die off (anything before 1970) and once we control the world, it will be a different story

>>377497735
Art is expansive.
Garbage is cheap.

>>377497849
It is art. Are you implying it isn't?

Keep in mind I'm not saying it's good art.

>>377497849
>implying art is not a money laundering scheme

File: MASHEEN HEAD.jpg (186KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1280x720px

>>377497329
>MACHINE HEEEEAD

>>377501657
"bad art" is an oxymoron.
It's a shame that the definition of art is so confusing for you modern people.

buying a video game for $100 million would look suspicious when trying to launder money

>>377497329
jean will always be that guy who worked with andy warhol

>>377502121
andy warhol will always be that guy who david bowie made a song about

MONEY LAUNDERINGGGGG

>>377501883
Five star post mah nigga.