This game is SLOW as FUCK compared to Bloodbourne. Its like they thought
>hey, now that we got DS3 out of the way, lets us code something else that is finally new and worthy of the modern 2017 gamer platforms
I just beat Bloodboorne and am entering into Dark Souls 3 thinking that it would be a 'new and exciting experience', when this shit is simply just delayed and slow as FUCK!. There is no turning back from this amirate? I just simply have a dildo stuck into my asshole with knee socks on awaiting the American trap lover experience?
yea, DaSIII is just BB lite pretty much. Worse levels, bosses, gameplay, weapons, music, art direction, etc. It was a pretty effective cash grab though. Low effort, but high reward
>>377418362
Yes. It doesn't help that the enemies have infinite stamina and bosses can teleport from the other side of the arena instantly. It makes the main character slow as fuck.
>>377418362
Now try dark souls 2 for giggles
I kinda agree and I don't even played Bloodborne.In fact Dark Souls III was my first souls game (after playing Demon's Souls in 2010) and I found myself having more trouble with bosses that have slow attacks. When I was fighting Pontiff for example I had absolutely no problems dodging his 8-hit combo, but it took me a few fights to get used to his slower attacks which he needs to charge for like 3 or 4 seconds. I'm always expecting these kind of attacks to come much faster.
>>377418362
game is bad because it's slow
so youu just suck get good
you get reckt because it's too slow
>>377419146
All the big enemies do that awkward slow attack. It's so you roll before and then get fucked. Memeyasaki at his finest.
>>377418362
git gud
>>377418362
Yeah its crazy. It almost feels like a sequel to dark souls 1 and 2.
>DARK SOULS 3 IS TOO SLOW
>DARK SOULS 3 IS TOO FAST
I don't know what's going on anymore.
>>377418362
bumpo
>>377418362
>Bloodbourne
>bourne
>u
>Bloodboorne