>a smartphone game looks better than a NINTENDO SWITCH

>>377193069
>that water
no it does not

>>377193242
It does.

>>377193273
Sure doesn't

>what are controls

>>377193293
Sure does.

>>377193069
If you can't play as a q2p2t I'm not interested

>>377193069
>being so desperate to poo poo the switch that you have to pull something from smartphone games

What game

>>377193312
Controls make the graphics look worse?

What game.

>>377193069
>smartphone game
But how could you tell how good it looks if your thumbs are always covering the screen?

>>377193312
So you can't use controls with phones?

>>377193069
That game also isn't running an intricate series of physics simulations, weather, dynamic lighting, and a multitude of behavioral AI.

>>377193273
>>377193338
False comments.

>>377193519
Why do you lie on the internet?

>>377193069
What game is it?

>>377193591
Why do you insist on ignoring reality? At least educate yourself on optimization and game development.

>>377193069
it absolutely does not. literally everything is worse technically. You are just such a faggot you think celshading looks bad.

File: now_you_fucked_up.jpg (96KB, 640x437px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 640x437px

http://oceanhorn.blogspot.com/2017/05/oceanhorn-2-first-gameplay-video-and.html

It's Oceanhorn 2, for anyone still lurking in the thread.

OP was too retarded to watch his own thread so hopefully that helps.

I played the first Oceanhorn on steam, and it was actually a cute little zelda-esque thing. Nothing super deep and no amazingly written story, but definitely fun to play if you can't/won't/already did play BotW.

>>377194010
Thanks.

>>377193069
>The game is a chinese knockoff of another Nintendo game