>2017 >still no game with realistic graphics that allow

File: 1478659295468.jpg (79KB, 496x515px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 496x515px

>>376981335
>expecting innovation when casuals still pre-order all your half assed Skinner boxes

>>376981335
>realism
Fuck you.

>>376981803
>I want the 159012834618th indie pixel game

>>376981803
>Not appreciating the technology

>>376981335
There is always real life OP, and user testing is free.

>>376981335
Game advancement has reached a dead end.
Consoles and interactive cinematic experiences killed games.

>>376981803
A modern X-Com with properly destructible environments would be great.

File: 1489263662796.jpg (86KB, 1219x773px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1219x773px

>>376981614
>expecting innovation when pirates wouldn't pay a cent for it anyways

performance issues

File: tmp_30761-14937978321861768957147.jpg (13KB, 231x247px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 231x247px

>>376985061
>implying piracy negatively affect sales

>>376981335
Try Battlefield: Bad Company. Literally everything is destructible except for stair cases.

>>376981904
>>376982021
>>376984009
Fuck all three of you.

Silent Storm has great destruction and it came out in fucking 2003. Every building is completely destructible and you can shoot or blow down doors and stuff, as well as shooting people through them.


It's not even a technical issue, just devs not wanting to implement it for various reasons.

>>376981335
>still no game with realistic graphics that allow you to shoot through the enviroment
>all scripted destruction sequence

You kind of do both in Red Faction: Guerilla

>>376985061
>blaming piracy
The industry is shit because they know that they can release a borken game and people will pay 60-100 USD for it. Would you work hard if you know that you can get pay for doing nothing? That's how they think.

File: 1493504137680.gif (664KB, 498x342px) Image search: [Google]

664KB, 498x342px

>>376987424
I would assume it would. Especially if it's an indie game with no multiplayer.

File: 1493188498513.gif (572KB, 160x119px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 160x119px

>>376981335
>implying more pirates buying games negatively affects sales
?

File: chomp.gif (27KB, 326x270px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 326x270px

>>376987943
I barely see really small games cracked on trackers, and they sell just as much on Steam.
Big ones get pirated to hell but also bought to hell, like Isaac, Terraria, Risk of Rain, Stardew, so on and so forth.
There's no way to make a realistic study on piracy though, since it'd be biased in a way or another no matter what, all I can say is that I've personally pirated a good chunk of games and bought them them I had money/they were on sale. Not everyone is gonna do this, of course, but I think the number of people who do do this (and idiots who buy games blind or just because it was cheap) is big enough.

File: 1466748484742.gif (2MB, 690x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 690x540px

>2017
>Still no first person RTS (besides mount & blade)
>Still no 3d dwarf fortress
>Still no game that lets you play as a necromancer and have a literal army of undead
>Still no game like old arctic valley
>Still no good WW2 games
>Still no good WW1 game

>>376987729
>it's not even a technical issue

>environmental destruction optimization nightmares not being a "technical" issues
Look at this idiot and laugh

>>376987828
Would you work hard if no one would pay for it?

>>376988296
>Still no game that lets you play as a necromancer and have a literal army of undead
Heroes of Annihilated Empires
Dominions

>Still no good WW2 games
Silent Storm

>>376988354
Well of course it takes performance but we have games that have done good destruction so it's not like devs aren't doing it because it's not possible or it makes the game unplayable.

I mean there's this tech demo that's many years old and nothing's been done with it still.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtC0lpKKE38

>>376988154
I see your point. I also admittedly do this myself as well. Usually in some form or another I end up buying the game anyway if I like it. Theoretically, would you think a game would sell better if it was uncrackable? Or would it sell better because people would pirate a game to see if they like it and then possibly they purchase it later on?

>you get duh min ish ing gains!
>see when this model has 60,000 polys instead of 6000 it looks duh same

fuck off faggots. we want 10 models on screen, not one model at a billion.

>>376981335
Rainbow 6 Siege is pretty fun for that. I love mucking around as Sledge

>>376988296
You're asking for a bunch of niche things that only a select group of gamers want. Ask for things in the action and adventure genres. And complain about how those things aren't being done.

>>376991018
>You're asking for a bunch of niche things that only a select group of gamers want.
Gee kind of like how all early video games were niche things that only a select part of society wanted to play.

> Ask for things in the action and adventure genres.
No.

>And complain about how those things aren't being done.
Why? I don't play those games.

>>376981335
>dead bodies disappear after time passes or reach a number of bodies on screen

Show me a computer with infinite memory, because that's what you would need to solve this

>>376981803
No fuck you!

File: windows_2873-11295611925[1].jpg (118KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1024x768px

>>376991486
How about I show you a game from 1998, that did exactly that without infinite memory?

>>376987705
FUCKYOU!

>>376991713
But anon, modern game design takes up too much processing power and memory to be able to do things that games did in the past.

>>376981335
>What is red faction guerilla?