>http://www.businessinsider.com/nin tendo-switch-vs-wii-w

File: ed3e15e6d2fa9fa0f822c3d62af520e9.jpg (28KB, 414x513px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 414x513px

>>376832951
the controller looks like fucking Droopy, so what did they expect?

you cant even read charts right.

>make console cheaper than Wii and Wii-U (if you adjust for inflation)
>create more stock
>WOW GUYS LOOK HOW GOOD IT'S SELLING COMPARED TO OUR OTHER CONSOLES!

Are people this retarded?

File: 1494501694470.png (28KB, 156x259px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 156x259px

>>376832951
If you read your own article, its actually doing better than both.

>>376833650
constructive. thanks for the enlightenment, anon.

File: 1491491658025.gif (2MB, 540x501px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x501px

Time to get a PS4.

>13.7 million software sales on Wii in the 1st quarter
That has to be counting the Wii Sports bundled in with the console right?

>>376834006
Red steel, COD 3, Madden, Zelda, Warioware, Tony Hawk

>>376832951
>Nintendo clearly has more of those rabid fans than most companies, but how well it can make the Switch appeal to everyone beyond that fan base will determine how well it sells in the long-term.

THIS.
And the Switch really can't afford to have the same game droughts that were prevalent on Wii-U.

>>376833419
>make console cheaper than Wii and Wii-U (if you adjust for inflation)
Wii U, sure, but Wii? $250 in 2006 = ~$300 in 2017.

>Compare the Wii/WiiUs two month quarters to a 28 day quarter on market
>Switch nearly obliterated both

Lol

>>376833419
>make console cheaper than Wii and Wii-U (if you adjust for inflation)
Ah yes, I forgot that in the past 10 years the value of the dollar has increased 45%

File: retard alert.jpg (22KB, 406x223px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 406x223px

>>376838005

>>376838264
So it's not cheaper and it's more like the same price?

Are you retarded?

>>376833650
>Switch sold less software than Wii U
Yeah, because the Wii U had more software TO sell. Switch only has two games mate, Wii U launched with like 8.

>>376838424
>$300 is not cheaper than $303.38

Might want to go back to pre-school, kid.

>>376838264
The wii was £170 on release (akin to £225) and the Switch is £270 here I think. It's expensive as fuck

>>376838570
Getting pissy about $3 eh? It's okay son, you can back out. You made a stupid point, anon will forget this.

File: 1494196218437.jpg (17KB, 220x217px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x217px

I miss the times when this board wasn't infested with retards and threads like this would get ignored and 404

>>376839134
Don't fool yourself, there was no such time. People were and always will be retarded

>>376833419
>Are people this retarded?

Clearly

What's great is the Switch could be the fastest and best selling video game system of all time and it would still get shitty 3rd party support.

This is the reality for Nintendo.

>>376838787
It's still true.

Switch's lack of 3rd party support will kill it in the end

It's having a good initial demand because of drones and this is the rare Nintendo console that actually launches with games worth owning

File: laughing majimas.jpg (148KB, 1024x703px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1024x703px

>>376839134
>"Remember when /b/ was good?"

>>376832951
>Still, the fact that early Switch sales are on par with the Wii and Wii U is worth remembering. The former was the biggest success in the company’s history; the latter was an abject failure. The wider context of the tech industry played a role in each of those results, but a console’s early days are always when its biggest fans are most likely to buy it. Nintendo clearly has more of those rabid fans than most companies, but how well it can make the Switch appeal to everyone beyond that fan base will determine how well it sells in the long-term.

itsnothing.gif

File: 1494369484485.jpg (90KB, 655x600px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 655x600px

>[current year]
>still believes Jewtendo will go 3rd party
wow stop posting anytime