Despite being disappointing from a gameplay and story perspective, do you consider MGSV to inevitably become a classic in the same vein that MGS2 did?
Keep in mind that MGS2 received the same kinds of criticisms when it originally came out, while also getting critical appraise.
>>376767789
what was so special about V?
Let's just cut to the chase
3 > 1 > V > 2 > PW >>>>> 4
If you think 4 is good, you are everything that is wrong with the MGS fanbase
>>376767789
MGS2 was a finished game
>>376767789
>Despite being disappointing from a gameplay
The gameplay si the only good thing of MGSV.
>>376767912
People will argue against that simply for the "Destroy Helicopter Mission 31" Meme
The controls and mechanics are probably the best of all time, but the actual applications for them get old after some while, mostly because of the map design.
>Despite being disappointing from a gameplay and story perspective
So, a complete failure all round ,then?
>>376767883
>>376767874
>what was so special about 2?
>>376768902
I was talking about that. About how Snake moves and interact with the environment.
I don't consider map and level/mission design part of the gameplay.
However the few places that feel like actual bases you can sneak in play relatively good thanks to the controls, not to the design of those places.
>>376767883
Why is 2 that low? It's definitely a better game than 1.