You will come for the Command and Conquer Thread, but you'll

File: destroys your path.jpg (7KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x168px

>Childhood is when you idolize the Nuke Cannon
>Adulthood is when you realize the Inferno Cannon makes more sense

File: Generals_Bomb_Truck.jpg (52KB, 630x363px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 630x363px

Post your favorite unit

File: 5341f73f049e9e81f796e7cdb540156b1620099ab40d054d6e81cca6ce0897cd.png (43KB, 1184x730px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1184x730px

>generals ends with the islams overrunning germany
>zero hour begins with china liberating germany from islams with nuclear weapons

Why is China so great, lads?

>>376696813
Kinda weird how USA is in the middle of all the stuff, not really the loser but never the winner ether.

Kinda realistic if you ask me

>mfw I play laser general and create a wall of lazer turrets around my CC
>keep mocking in voice chat I calculate you will loose this battle general

File: wishing for death(in French).gif (383KB, 960x408px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 960x408px

>>376695534
TFW C&C is ded

File: 1482168207542.jpg (168KB, 598x636px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 598x636px

>>376697234
Don't remind me man

what went wrong about C&C 4 in the dev cycle?
why did they botch generals 2?
why does EA enjoy sucking horsecocks

>>376695534
>Dr. Thrax
>relevant past killing chink infantry generals
meme general

>>376697441
.t faggot got memed by humwees and angry mobs

>>376697441
At least he is pretty goofy in quotes and his toxic shit can be a good annoyance to any based generals

>>376697423
>generals 2
Imagine the shitstorm that would follow a game that openly associates Islam and terrorism today.

File: file.png (208KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 480x360px

>I love a crowd!

It was a different time.

File: feelsman.jpg (6KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 224x225px

>>376697234
and fags think generals was a good C&C game RA2 was the end of C&C it hurts so bad anon

>>376697481
>>376697491
This is why i take general jizz instead. Prince ahmed is also a meme

how can I still play c&c:generals with friends? I have two copies somewhere, but I remember pirated versions where some kind of fucked up

>>376697543
RA2 was peak but generals was good in its own merits now
>>376697592
just play with mods,shockwave RotR or something they're stil alive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L5x4IavuZQ

Auf Wiedersehen

>>376697543
Generals was actually a pretty damn good game, and helped slide C&C into the 3D area where we got Red Alert 3 (was pretty good) and C&C 3 (really fucking good)

>>376697637
TY for the shockwave mod anon. Will it work with pirated / cracked versions? Otherwise the only option is to get the "10 year" version, where generals is included.

>>376697770
Yea it will, i got the pirated thing of C&C the last decade and any mods for them work fine

How do I get this game to not run like shit? I have C&C 3 too and that runs perfect.

>>376697770
indeed it does, pirated versions can be modded as well but I'm not a huge fan of shockwave as it's a clusterfuck

File: China.jpg (80KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1024x768px

China will grow larger!

Easily best faction if just for the memes

File: Prism_Tanks.jpg (58KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 640x480px

Lens shifters in working position

File: Gla-logo-command-and-conquer-228029_200_200.gif (14KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 200x200px

>>376698050
Enjoy your power management faggot!

China is pretty good, i enjoy MiGs

>>376697770
I have a pirated Generals/ZH v1.4 on my computer and it works fine.

>>376696813
>Sporting an invincible locust swarm style People's Army financed by sucking the internet dry
>Not being awesome
Pick just one

>>376698137
Nothing like a MiG firestorm :3

File: 1484922570906.jpg (146KB, 884x666px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 884x666px

>>376697520
>PC Gamer got so triggered they spent half the review bitching about it
We really should have seen all this coming.

>>376697519
EA tried to make the GLA look like one of those university diversity photographs you see in their brochures

>>376695534
Just reminder than Generals are not C&C

BUNKA IS READY

>>376697853
>>376697917
>>376698150

thanks to you kind anons. Any good mod recommendations?

>>376697519
the only shitstorm was Generals 2 was turned into a facebook-tier browser game, which flopped. There hasn't been a good C&C game since Generals.

C&C 1 was good
Red Alert 1 was good
Red Alert 2 was kinda good
Generals was good
All the rest have been trash
EA won't even admit to even having bought the license to the trash that is C&C Sole Survivor

I hate it as much as you guys but C&C's been dead for 10 years and it's not comin back.

>>376697692
meh, red alert 3 was good. entertaining campaign, pretty balanced. but for some reason it doesn't hold up to red alert 2. ra2 is so unbalanced, but for some reason its fun af.

c&c 3 is definitely better than tiberian sun though

>>376698050
BUILD MORE TANKS!!!!!!

>>376698923
yea RA3 campaigns were alright, if anything for the hot asian grils in the cutscenes and RA3's units were pretty inventive.

>>376698905
Come on man, C&C 3 was pretty fucking cool

>>376698905
I have my fun with kanes wrath. Its not perfect, but its a good C&C Game I say

>>376697049
It's all a masive parody.

The USA is extremely patriotic, hi-tech and achieve fuck all... just as real USA was at the time of post-9/11 Bush administration.

China is unapologetically communist with all the tropes associated, but they are growing in power every minute... just as the second Red Scare predicted back then (think BF2, same time, also involves China BTFO-ing USA).

GLA is GLA, I mean, the parodies of everything involved except religion (which wasn't even a factor back in the day) are pretty straightforward.

>>376699041
Eh true

>>376698893
Rise of the reds for an alive multiplayer and a relatively balanced gameplay

>>376699210
I had my eye on this. Ty man

Has anyone here touched C&C 4? If so, what's the gameplay like and how awful is it?

>>376699014
I got a sour taste in my mouth ever since Tiberian Sun. I tried C&C 3 but it just didn't feel right. Just felt like RA2 or 3 with a generic futuristic C&C skin tacked on.

All EA literally have to do is make a GOOD (and I put it in all caps there) modern successor to Generals. It's literally all they have to do, but they'll fuck it up somehow by either catering to casuals, pandering to SJWs or fucking up a remaster like everyone else does.

>>376699041
These. Extremely these. The whole game is a parody on the world powers/politics of the time and of now.

I mean shit, the GLA had the Toxin Tractor as a unit. Just a fucking farm tractor whose special ability was "COVER A WHOLE FUCKING SCREEN WITH GREEN SHIT".

The 3 generals per side and the powers unlock tree was pretty revolutionary for it's time. Nothing else came along similar until CoH came out in 2006-something.

completely unrelevant, but important: How can I play battle for middlearth 2: wrath of the lichking online. Cant buy cd keys online, game is not available anywhere.

>>376698905
CnC1 and RA1 games: bretty good
Tib Sun: dankest atmosphere and single player of the series
RA2: pure unbalanced chaotic fun
Generals: a mix of all that came before in a good fun package
CnC3: Pretty good overall
RA3: Good ideas here and there but dual-role units everywhere was a pain and didn't come close to recapturing RA2's magic
CnC4: doesn't exist


CnC3 bugged me a lot with little minor things. I still dislike how they decided to have GDI 'regress' from Tiberian Sun, while Nod became the futuristic hyper-advanced faction even further. In TS they were both that, but in different ways. It also lost a little of the charm TS and other games had and played things straighter, which left it feeling like it'd lost some of its soul. I think it was the best multiplayer of the franchise past the first games though.

>>376697423
>what went wrong about C&C 4 in the dev cycle?

C&C 4 was a salvaged attempt at the Asian F2P market. It got released as it did soleley because the World Economic Crisis of 2008 hit EA hard like any other big company and they had to scrape all the money they could to not go under.

>why did they botch generals 2?
Inexperienced development team. Couldn't uphold deadlines, couldn't wrestle Frostbite 2 to do what they wanted it to. Their design principles werre unclear and lead in all sorts of diverging directions.

In the end, it all came down to the fact that after tthey let go of EALA, the company lost its only experieced development team.

>why does EA enjoy sucking horsecocks
Horsecocks are great, just ask /mlp/.
They're a pretty shitty company but they've upheld a good standard for C&C in the past (saved the series from Westwood's failure, then revived it again into the previous generation with the 3rd entries, even tried to rvive it again with the original Generals 2 ~ the AAA game, not the F2P one, which was for all intents and purposes an extremely risky and not business favoring decision they ended up losing a lot of money over) with the exception of the post-crisis economy timeine.

>>376699336
Don't even bother. The gameplay is that you make units from your flying fortress to counter whatever units are being sent at you. Sometimes you have to control an area. Sometimes you pick up a singular floating tiberium crystal.

There's nothing interesting about it. I have no idea about MP, I only played the campaign/co-op.

currently playing C&C generals for the first time doing campaign atm im wondering whats the best skirmish faction vs AI? my friend said USA Air is he right?

>>376699517
Hook up with Gamereplays.org people.
They have a community patch and a ton of guidelines on it.

It's most likely going to end up being the patch+some virtual LAN client (think Hamachi, just not as ancient/dead).

>>376699826
>best skirmish faction vs AI?

It doesn't really matter.

>>376699826
Generals was an amazing multiplayer game but I really pity you if you're playing it for the single player

>>376700001
i got nobody to play with and online is dead man

>>376699826
Well, if you know how to play the game properly, no AI stands a chance against you in skirmish.

However, yes, Super Weapon is the best for the Generals Challenge mode.
You simply spam Auroras... AI has a very hard time shutting them down while EMP patriots with the mortars kill everything they'll ever throw at your base.

File: comq.jpg (21KB, 250x354px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 250x354px

i have this from ages ago. which one should i play

the answer is generals of course B)

>>376699846
thank you too my man. I am still using hamachi daily, mostly for old, dead games/gems. Will give it a try. Alway thought that Middleearth 2 was a really good RTS, even If one is not a great tolkien fan

>>376700017
that's the problem with old rts games
but the ai was awful and it's not like it has a story

>>376696580
Nuclear truck is rated 9/11

File: Orca_Bomber_3.jpg (29KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x400px

>>376700093
tiberum sun you faggot.

>>376696402
Nuke cannons are good for defence and inferno are better for offense

File: worker.jpg (5KB, 53x45px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 53x45px

Can I have some new shoes?

>>376699210
Rotor is not balanced at all, the guy who made it clearly is a russaboo so made the Russian faction ridiculously op

>>376698952
More like build more Helicopters

File: 1484265611631.png (17KB, 247x239px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 247x239px

>Tiberium Sun Firestorm
>Final mission against Cabal
>Defensive systems offline, activating backup measures

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_canceled_Command_%26_Conquer_games

hi

File: 1483552728635.jpg (59KB, 400x209px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 400x209px

>>376700508
>Has no anti air whatsoever

>>376700556
No one is upset, it was going to be F2P, it would have been absolute garbage - it's for the best.

>>376697667
Unit Lost.

>>376700556
>Renegade 2 - Westwood touching Red Alert 2 with their retarded bullshit
>Continuum - Westwood, having failed once already, pushing to make yet another MMORPG because hey, Blizzard did it and they're now swimming in dosh!
>Tiberian Incursion - Westwood trying to make C&C 4 before C&C3.

And you people wonder why EA kicked booted their asses off.
They made shitty RTS games and shitty games of other genres while referring to work on the latter.

Also, that list is incomplete. It has no mention of C&C Generals 2.
You know, this game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6bg6yhyTK4
That and the F2P fuck-up were two completely separate projects (which Victory Games fucked up on both of).

Nox was westwoods best game

File: guan yu.jpg (275KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 800x600px

>Play Contra009 as Thrax
>*Blocks your path*

>>376700582
>Built 100 Orcas a a kid to prepare
>Doesn't destroy it

I think the only legit way to kill it is to use the Bridge collapse exploit

>>376700957
>They made shitty RTS games

You shut your whore mouth, Red Alert 2 is the best RTS period.

I wish C&C was alive.

>>376695534
>*laughs*
Just type out the laughter, *action* makes you look like retard fresh off the boat from Gaia.

>>376700957
Renegade was good though...

File: 1494227939202.jpg (230KB, 1080x941px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1080x941px

>We will never see a scrin invasion force
>We will never see cyborg commandos return
>We will never get to send hover units over water to blow up bridges again

>>376701702
>C&C4 literally ignores C&C3 ending
FUCK.

>>376701162
Makes sense as it was not made by Westwood.
After they finished Firestorm, they went on to make Emperor: Battle for Dune while EA Pacific, renamed to Westwood Pacific made Red Alert 2, then Yuri's Revenge and then they ot renamed to EA again and went on to make Generals, BFME 1+2, C&C3, RA3,...

>>376702320
Enlightening.

>>376697543
Generals was a great game, contrarian faggot.