why do people still think sub-144fps, non-4k gaming is acceptable?

>>376590368
>Not playing at 16k 960fps
kys faggot

>>376590368
>You can see a difference between 60fps and 144 fps
Stop lying, retard

>>376590793
Just because you're too much of an autist to see it doesn't mean others can't

>>376590368
Who thinks this exactly?

File: FaceApp_1492805693007.jpg (253KB, 718x718px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 718x718px

>>376590653
>Not 256M and 600k fps

>>376590970
>Playing sub 1.08 * 10^101 and 6 * 10^98 fps

>>
>>376590368
>caring about a frogposter
>current year
Play your vidya, I will be watching my gf play ps 3 games on a 30 inch fatscreen and get to shrek her pussy everyday :^)

modern games with good graphics are objectively less fun than ps2 era cartoony graphics games

Name one modern game that and build setup that can push 4k above 60fps ultra settings.
No e-sports shit.

>>376593663
fuck off nostalgiafag its the same shit.
the only good games are late 90s/early 2000s RPGs

144fps, 4k gaming is a meme.
Real patricians game in 21:9.

>>376594010
wrong

you have shit taste as well

>>376594010
> fuck off nostalgiafag its the same shit.
> proceeds to nostalgia hard

File: u7.jpg (74KB, 886x301px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 886x301px

>>376594297
No, I have nostalgia for NES, SNES and Genesis. RPG's were an acquired taste and I've come to realize they're the best in terms of gameplay, design and pushing the boundaries of hardware

>>376590368
1080p 60fps is acceptable. Only for low end but still acceptable

>it's a dumb frogposter is butthurt about /v/ shitting on his cinematic 24fps episode