>have save corruption issue
>write rant, claiming moral high ground that he can't recommend the game since "you could have this issue too11"
>bug is already fixed and save files repaired BEFORE review is published
>still publish article, dropping metascore from 83 to 78
will Stapleface Dan get away with this?
Meta scores don't matter, but Stapleton's a hack.
You just made this thread.
>>376568462
>>376570948
Considering normies care about them, and Obsidian not getting paid for having a score under 85 with Fallout NV, they kinda do
>>376571027
Good find anon, proud of you, keep it up
boo fucking hoo
>Game has gamebreaking glitch
>give it score it deserves for being unplayable
>WHAT THE FUCK IGN WHY DIDN'T YOU GIVE THIS GAME I LIKE 10/10 REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Pathetic
>>376570759
I know that it really must suck for the developers to have the score of their game drop so low, but I really don't understand why people who have already purchased/pirated/hated/enjoyed the new Prey give a fuck what it's score or user score is on Metacritic.
>>376572505
>Game has gamebreaking glitch that seems to only affect a small number of people.
>Gamebreaking glitch and all save files affected by it are fixed before the review is out.
>Score it as if it wasn't already fixed.
????
Literally paid by sony to shit on the PC version.
>>376572505
*gamebreaking glitch that only a fraction of players experienced
*that has already been fixed before the review was published
I bet they won't even touch on the terrible input lag of the PS4 version
>>376570759
If only they cared this much about bugs in Bethesda games.