Alright /v/. You've failed me last time, but I'll give

>>376429275
I legit do not know. I am sorry.

Try top left and bot right as bomb spaces, top right and bot left as clear spaces.

>>376429275
I'd go with bottom left desu

Mines are both in the top

Trust me, my dad works at minesweeper

The top row is bomb, bottom row is safe

>>376429275
that's why i fucking hate this game, is there was no space for luck it would have been awesome

>25% to win
nah fuck it just lynch me

Why are you fucks still playing this luck-based game and not hexcells

File: Capture.png (265KB, 684x373px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 684x373px

>>376432202
minesweeper isn't about winning, it's about winning quickly
you play to see how fast you can clear grids. if you lose you just start a new grid

Bottom left, top right.

Check my 8 and post results, fag

Mines come in clusters, its top left

Top left bottom right
EZPZ

>>376432441
I think my record on hard difficulty is like 97 seconds. I can see how I could theoretically reach your times if I learned to use the semi-automated clearing but my autism has it's limits.

>>376433575
>use the semi-automated clearing
you mean you don't use dual click?

>>376433628
Yeah I only play with single clicks like a true patrician oldschool gamer.

>>376429275
i might be wrong but I think you win if you place all the flags correctly so just try all the combinations before doing luck click

>>376432393
No internet

File: minesweeper2.png (6KB, 590x198px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 590x198px

post no flag times

File: 6am.gif (324KB, 500x266px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 500x266px

>>376434374
>no flag

>>376434771
>playing with flags
what's the matter? you some kind of casual?

>>376434926
It just seems like a pointless handicap that does nothing but slows the logic process to add some meaningless manual dexterity

Minesweeper is a game about how fast you can think, not about how many boxes you can click