>we're getting to the point where 10 year old console

>Minecraft was 8 years ago

>Overwatch was 16 years ago

>>376404757
Halo is an example though. It was being financed by Microsoft and made by old bungle. Most games from back then could still look like shit

>>376404757
We're reaching a point where there's less and less room to reasonably improve graphics. Jumps in performance on consoles would be the next logical step.

File: 1492775894054.png (804KB, 832x1229px) Image search: [Google]

804KB, 832x1229px

>>376404757
>don't look like shit anymore
and? they all still play like shit

>>376406510
Really makes you wonder if Nintendo wasn't on to something with the new zelda.

File: BCmDurandal1600x1200.jpg (534KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 1600x1200px

>>376404757
>1995 was 400 years ago.

File: 1453254161746.jpg (70KB, 452x710px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 452x710px

>>376404757
>10 years ago
>10 years
>10

>>376407484
>go to play halo 3 because i haven't played it in two years
>player population has fallen from 4000 to only 300
the mcc completely killed halo 3

File: 1449489145836.jpg (58KB, 508x508px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 508x508px

>>376407615
MCC was supposed to be the one thing you literally cannot fuck up.

And they fucked it up.

I'm still upset about it. I mean I got a PC and Switch to supplement my Xbox, but I love Halo. They honestly probably shouldn't have opened the trilogy again.

>>376404757
The environments in this game still look very nice. The art style Bungie stuck to gives the old trilogy a kind of timeless look to them. Very simple but recognisable environments and characters, and not overdesigned to the point where your eyes hurt.

Halo 3 was one of the few games worth the massive hype surrounding it for years ahead

>>376406532
name atleast 356 video games within the next 356 seconds that dont run like shit

>>376404757
>upscaled screenshots and bullshots look ok
halo 3 never ran at 1920x1080. this is a bullshot. retard.