Would it have been successful at a $5 dollar price or is mobile

>>376381892
>implying it was a flop
just because you didn't buy it doesn't mean no one else did

It should have been free, make it so you have to wait for levels to unlock or getting a certain amount of coins, sell 1 ups, premium skins, power ups, unlock levels, shit like that.

>>376382012
>March 2017, Kimishima said that revenue from the iOS version of Super Mario Run "did not meet our expectations".[68] Fire Emblem Heroes, Nintendo's next mobile title released in February 2017, used the more traditional freemium payment approach, and by the end of Nintendo's 2016 fiscal year (March 31, 2017), had outperformed Super Mario Run in overall revenue.[69]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_Run#Post-release
Not a flop, but probably not enough revenue for nintendo to try again with this business model.

Me and gf both love mario, despite her not being a "gamer" and me being too poor to afford shit, we were both happy to hear about maRio run. We beat world one on the first day to discoverify the 10$ paywalll. I hadnt been that angry at a game since sonic adventure 99

>>376383193
they were very explicit that it would be a one time pay app

>>376381892
I actually like that business model, but it seems paying to not wait, paying to buy a fictional currency and the app still being ridden with ads is more profitable.

File: 1494135961744.jpg (374KB, 1266x1600px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1266x1600px

oh yea, this was a thing hey

>>376383548

Are both her arms coming out of the same shoulder? what the fuck?

>>376383659
What?

>>376383659
holy kek I can't unsee it

>>376383659
fuck you

>>376383372
It doesn't say that anywhere in the Google Play description. It's rather misleading. I hate apps that pull that shit.

File: 2017-05-09.png (2MB, 2880x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2880x1920px

>>376384298
can you read? they were pretty upfront with the one time payment

>>376383659
>>376384010
>>376384129

How are you seeing this?

is it actually fun? should i get an APK?

i expected this to be like temple run. i was disappointed

>>376381892
No. Mobile users refuse to pay up front.

>>376384576
It's alright. You're not missing out on much.

>>376381892
It should have been a paid app from the start instead of the $10 roadblock. I get that they wanted people to try out the game for free but many viewed it as a malicious bait and switch instead.

It also doesn't help that the game doesn't do anything new or interesting that helps set it apart from all the other auto runners on the market.