can one enjoy Fallout after experiencing the wonderful realistic

>>376318290
Maybe the older fallouts for how brutal they can be. Also NV Hardcore mode but, You are still not going to find the level of autistic realism that stalker has.

>>376318290
Bethesda Fallout? Hell no, STALKER just scratches that itch a lot better. New Vegas, 1 and 2 are fine to enjoy though, they're strange and interesting.

>>376318290
New Vegas with some difficulty mods and hardcore mode can be pretty rough. Not like Stalker, but still, harder than anything in the base game

New Vegas is good for quests, factions, roleplaying

Stalker is good for gunplay, semi-realism, atmosphere, and spookiness

>>376318796
>What is day z

>>376318290
Kinda. I've tried to mod Fallout 4 so that it's a bit more like Fallout, but the shooting and enemy AI never really compares. That and even with a 1060 and i5 processor, Fallout 4 runs like complete shit while modded Stalker with vsync gives me a perfectly smooth 60 fps.

>>376318290
>>376318290

Fallout was never meant to be "realistic"

>>376320393
more like Stalker, I mean

>>376320282
A shit game :^)

>>376318290
They're two different genres, one is shit-cobbled-together apocalyptic, and one is gasmask realism apocalyptic.

>>376320683
Actually there are three different genres.

Fallout 1, 2 and New Vegas - Post-Post Apocalyptic

Fallout 3 and 4 - Post Apocalyptic

STALKER - Apocalyptic Punk