Why is this getting no attention here? https://www.youtube.c

>>376311489
>no gameplay
What am I supposed to be excited for

>No gameplay footage
It's going to be Takedown red saber 2.0

File: 8b29pnu.gif (969KB, 250x175px) Image search: [Google]

969KB, 250x175px

>>376311573
Looks alot more polished than that turd of a game. So you are already full of shit. Oh and there is gameplay footage, you just don't have to be a retard and a lazy shit to find it.

>>376311673
Wow, Anon, you're so cool. Can you sign my Steam profile please?

>>376311758
the fuck are you talking about?

>>376311489
>please be excited about this concept

ok but where is the gameplay?

YOU'RE IN MY SPOT SIR

>>376311489
00:55 holly shit please tell me there is going to be a school shooting. How much of shit storm that will rise in the media.

>>376312296
not as much shit storm if it was a game about causing a school schooting, less of a shitstorm if they see that we play a swat team trying to prevent one.

File: what_the_fuck_did_you_just_say.jpg (37KB, 410x424px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 410x424px

>>376311489
>Why is this getting no attention here?
Cocksucker, every day we have a thread about it. Stop shilling please. It puts what can become a good game in a shitty light because you faggots can't just wait for the devs to actually make the game and shill the same fucking trailer all over again.

>>376312296
I read the video description and I think that is going to be their marketing strategy - tactical shooter + edginess. The setting is 20 minutes into the future collapsing America where all kinds of shit hit the fan.

File: 1484366882213.jpg (66KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 960x640px

some gameplay here
https://twitter.com/ReadyOrNotGame/status/860100842099138560

>>376311573
>It's going to be Takedown red saber 2.0
And here is the other cocksucker who goes in every fucking RoN thread to post this shit. You posted in the countless ones before. Give it a fucking rest, friend.
>inb4 did you buy Red Sabre lmao?
Yeah, you posted that already as well.

>The Anal Staircase

nice Coil reference.

>>376312285
now let's see you boogie, cop!
>>376312415
>>376312498
Literally no threads about this ever, delete this copypasta

>>376311489
Pretty poorly put together trailer desu. I also want to see some real gameplay.

>>376312473
>0:10
>Shoot shoulder
>Head explodes

>>376311489
We've already had like a dozen threads over the past few days. Us old SWAT 4 fans don't want to over hype something that we probably have a 25% chance of actually getting.

Looks really sweet, would kickstart if they did a campaign.

File: 1484563981661.jpg (200KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1920x1080px

>>376311489
>expect ready or not by the fugees to play
>become disappointed

>>376312761
They'll get a campaign, don't worry.

>>376312667
Were you missing for the last week or something?

File: Stairwell.jpg (131KB, 3286x1739px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 3286x1739px

>>376311489

File: 32622232344.jpg (207KB, 455x527px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 455x527px

>>376311573
>Takedown red saber 2.0
So it's going to be like Rainbow Six* Siege then?

*No actual relevance to the Rainbow Six series

>>376313008
>M14 in close combat
Fudd pandering. Preorder canceled.

File: MPL.jpg (161KB, 3286x1739px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 3286x1739px

>>376311489
more

Jesus, the shilling is getting embarrassing by the thread.
Hey devs, you game is going to be garbage so fuck off.

File: retarded.gif (1024KB, 218x228px) Image search: [Google]

1024KB, 218x228px

>>376313058
The player just might be retarded. You don't know who's playing it.

File: swat5.jpg (165KB, 490x360px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 490x360px

>>376313151
Ur mom is garbage.

File: 1479916712406.jpg (89KB, 640x623px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x623px

Reminder that a 3 man dev team can not create a good game this scale, support Squad instead

>>376313110
Why is a supposed SWAT member using an obscure German SMG from the 60s? I guess that's a part of the setting then, older/obscure guns. I don't really mind it though.

>>376313151
>>376312950
>>376312761
>schizophrenics talking about imaginary threads

>>376312473
>2 second clips of guns being shot


wow now I know this won\t be shovelware

>>376313350
>more than one person tells me I'm wrong.
>they must be wrong.
You have a nice day, Sir. There are a lot of crazies out there.

>>376313151
This. Shilling is fucking real. Every one of them mentioning SWAT 5 to get any attention. Suck a dick shills.

>>376313275
How insecure. It's almost like you know your game will end up being Takedown tier so your only chance is to hype up gullible retards with muh SWAT4.
Literally kys.

File: 1469092517432.jpg (9KB, 323x243px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 323x243px

Whatever happened to Ground Branch? I thought that was supposed to save the genre years ago

>>376311489
Look I'm going to give you real talk.

When the game is FINISHED, then you can shill it, because it'll be a proper game, not 1/8th of a game that was promised but never delivered.
Early Access is a huge red flag to anyone who's ever payed for one before. It's an Omen.

posting 'GAME OF THE YEAR 2017' in your title when it's the middle of May is another red flag

The way you've worded your beginning post is another red flag, it's exactly what someone would say if they were payed too. You ever been on one of those shitty school fieldtrips doing something boring but the guide is super happy and upbeat even though he's bored as shit too? That's what you sound like.
"I'm talking about a gamechanger"
"it is JUST LIKE SWAT 4"
-exclamation points everywhere-
-words in FULL CAPS everywhere-

Linking a few 'cool' trailers along with a specific release date for consoles and pc.

but the biggest red flag of all is how you just copy+paste your OP post.

Shitty shill is still a shill

>>376311489
Is this the new hip game to shill after prey?

File: 099993-75x75-A.jpg (10KB, 222x222px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 222x222px

>>376313734
>posting 'GAME OF THE YEAR 2017' in your title when it's the middle of May is another red flag
I didn't title the video
>"I'm talking about a gamechanger"
>"it is JUST LIKE SWAT 4"
>-exclamation points everywhere-
>-words in FULL CAPS everywhere-
None of those were in my OP
>but the biggest red flag of all is how you just copy+paste your OP post.
Impossible because this is the first thread on the subject. No one here has ever talked about this and I just didn't want a spiritual successor to one of my favourite games to be slept on. not every one is a shill you fuck memeing faggot.

>>376313276

>squad

>>376314103
Look I'm going to give you real talk.

When the game is FINISHED, then you can shill it, because it'll be a proper game, not 1/8th of a game that was promised but never delivered.
Early Access is a huge red flag to anyone who's ever payed for one before. It's an Omen.

posting 'GAME OF THE YEAR 2017' in your title when it's the middle of May is another red flag

The way you've worded your beginning post is another red flag, it's exactly what someone would say if they were payed too. You ever been on one of those shitty school fieldtrips doing something boring but the guide is super happy and upbeat even though he's bored as shit too? That's what you sound like.
"I'm talking about a gamechanger"
"it is JUST LIKE SWAT 4"
-exclamation points everywhere-
-words in FULL CAPS everywhere-

Linking a few 'cool' trailers along with a specific release date for consoles and pc.

but the biggest red flag of all is how you just copy+paste your OP post.

Shitty shill is still a shill

File: 1481000468920.jpg (28KB, 669x471px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 669x471px

>>376314404
Oh I get it another funnay copypasta

File: 1-g4zsvHxslR-946bI_twV-w.jpg (27KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x388px

>>376313276
>look up squad
>not swat related at all
Fuck you I was excited. Why can't I vicariously live my dream of being a 90's swat dude through vidya anymore

>Ready or Not
That is one dumb ass name for a video game right there. Sounds like some Korean boy band.

>>376314839
Honestly if you start to think about it, good new game names are hard to come up. Everything is used.

>>376313008
Whenever I see an M14 in a non WW2 game I only think of Hitman Blood money and killing all the White House guards.

>>376313734
Nobody wrote game of the year, anon you have problems, there is no such text.
The guy did not name the video, is not even an official channel of the developers.
>words in FULL CAPS everywhere-
SWAT was a full caps name. And that's the only full caps word he posted.

>Linking a few 'cool' trailers along with a specific release date for consoles and pc.
There are not a few trailers, there is 1 trailer, there is no release date and it might not even come out on console according to the devs twitter.

I bet you just added "swat" and pasted this, you don't even like videogames.

File: Special Weapons And Tactics.webm (3MB, 1067x800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1067x800px

>>376312285

File: hqdefault (1).jpg (33KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x360px

>>376315161
>replying to bait

>>376314103
>>376315161

Not recognising copypasta is the mark of the shill

I actually came in here to discuss the game before you faggots ruined it

>>376315349
If I did not at least try to talk with people that look like retards I would be prejudiced, since we have captcha there are no or hardly any bot, that post was not done by a bot or a troll but a retard, maybe we should just enable /rk9/ rules on all boards.

>>376313325
I've asked that question more than once.
I'd expect in a "slighty-more-dystopic-american-city" large enough to need a SWAT team would have access to p90s and mp5s

>>376315161
>I bet you just added "swat" and pasted this, you don't even like videogames.
Neither do you, Pajeet. How much do you get for an hour?

>>376315541
>Visceral gore
Deaths need to be impactful to the end user and we’re committed to providing an experience like no other. If characters in the game are hit, parallax bullet holes spawn on flesh, and blood will then seep out into surrounding fabrics. A gory bullet hole also becomes an emitter, as individuals who knock their wounds onto objects create a small splatter, based on bone velocity. In the future, we plan to implement an entire bodily destruction system.

yeeeeee boi!

Also there is a gameplay video on their twitter account, i don't think it is enough to go on however.
https://twitter.com/ReadyOrNotGame/status/860100842099138560

File: shiggy diggy with a smile.gif (77KB, 248x248px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 248x248px

>visit their website
>click link on "strategic planning" for a youtube link expecting a video detailing how it works
> get https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xgNc3-nBpI
Well, at least it sound nice, but somebody clearly fucked up eh eh.

>From flashbangs to snake-cams to deploy-able ladders, players are provided with the freedom to fulfill their tactical plan.......

>Engage in combat with an arsenal of non-deadly weapons including pepper-guns, tasers, pepper spray, and beanbag shotguns.

Neat, it got them all, which is something that should be expected, for a game not to be worse than something from 2004, the ladder is an interesting idea, but anyway just from the website it seems clear that is made to be replayed, somebody really is a SWAT fan.

>multiplayer
>Bring order to chaos with up to 8 friends in co-op, or battle other SWAT units in a frantic, competitive multiplayer environment.

>>376316013
nice "gameplay"

>>376314839
I can come up with ten better names than 'ready or not' immediately without even trying.

>>376316271
Well post them then

>Armour collision in Ready or Not is calculated based on the mesh coverage on the player, allowing for accurate levels of realistic ballistic protection
Does that mean that customizing the character's look might be a bad idea?

>3 man team

Yeah, it's going to be shit.

>>376316167
>multiplayer
>Bring order to chaos with up to 8 friends in co-op, or battle other SWAT units in a frantic, competitive multiplayer environment.
Didn't SWAT 4 have this?

>>376316526
Raven Shield had multiplayer too. I'll never forget dropping into different servers, starting a round and everyone just immediately equipping frags to lob across the map in hopes of getting an early kill

>People are actually hyped for another early a cashgrab when they could be playing an actual tactical game like Siege
lmaoing at your life cuckbois

>As of pre-alpha, we currently have over 30+ items in total, with plans to greatly expand this selection monthly. Concerns may arise over balance issues, but each item will have its place and value considered in order to avoid having duplicate functioning (but visually different) gear

Seems like early access is confirmed.
>>376316526
Yep it was 8 indeed. I hope is as slow as SWAT.

File: 6546164616546116.jpg (96KB, 890x656px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 890x656px

>>376316914

False Flag up the fucking ass

Siege is like idunno "Arcade Tactical"?

File: 62164651546451645.png (309KB, 710x608px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 710x608px

>>376317069

SWAT was always more realistic than Rainbow 6

Every Rainbow 6 was just "BRO HEADSHOT"

>>376311489
my body is ready to violate some civil rights

>>376317210
>thinking Rainbow Six started with Vegas

>>376317210
>Every Rainbow 6 was just "BRO HEADSHOT"

Confirmed for not knowing shit.

Siege is a derirative of Takedown, which was the first RB6 to be a bro shooter and was universally hated for it.

>>376316167
>>376317210

SWAT had terrible multiplayer

While Rainbow 6 always had good multiplayer

>>376317303

Nononon

Siege is Lockdown

https://youtu.be/H_egGmoYcXE

>>376317306
I like playing against AI.

>>376317274
>>376317303

Have you guys even played the Rainbow 6 multiplayers? Raven Shield had a terrible meta surrounding it and Vegas was just equip light armor and break the netcode

>>376317509

>playing Rainbow 6 games
>for multiplayer

The games were never designed for it Raven shield was almost exactly like Siege where Headshots are king.

and dont get me fucking started on doors

>>376317509
I don't think multiplayer was ever the selling point of Raven Shield and was never really balanced around it, since the meat of the playable maps were just straight up campaign maps with a team starting either side.

Vegas multi was garbage though, yes.

>>376317509

lol Raven shield MP was like fucking COD and SWAT MP was no better

Tactical shooters should be AI only whiteboys

File: 55612456669615911.png (272KB, 867x768px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 867x768px

>>376317884

I mean I guess Siege has that locked down like the other dude says we could call it "Arcade Tactical"

>>376317884
Which i hope RoN delievers in good friendly and enemy AI especially enemy so it doesn't turn into easy mode if you operate with your friends, satisfying breach and clear and tight gunplay

>Its another Ready or Not shill thread

Give up OP you wont fool me into buying your game made by 3 indie trash devs

File: 5161465161895141.gif (2MB, 370x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 370x281px

>>376317884

I never get why people hype up multiplayer in tactical shooters its why siege exists

Whenever I bring up Rainbow 6, SOCOM, or Ghost Recon I always get "BRO those games had amazing multiplayer"

File: usawellfare.png (169KB, 860x684px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 860x684px

>>376317884
Autism is strong with this sub saharan african dindu

>>376311489
>>376312498
>Why is there no attention for this game?
>HEY YOU, STOP POSTING IN COUNTLESS THREADS DEDICATED TO THIS HERE GAME!

The fuck?
Either there's no attention or there are countless threads. Pick one, faggot.

File: 14545154516465124.jpg (17KB, 207x253px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 207x253px

>>376318332
>>376317884

Because those games DID have good multiplayer aspects

Fighting agasint AI can only be so much fun but it gets fucking boring.You are fucking autistic for saying people should not like Tactical shooter multiplayers

>>376317884
Tactical shooters are at their best when they revolve around asymmetrical warfare but you just can't pull that off in a balanced way in multiplayer unless you start moving towards arcadey gameplay.

>>376318475

Because every multiplayer for those games even SWAT 4 and Ravenshield have players play the game the way it is not intended

>>376318462
I am only one of those people

>>376311489
are there women?

>>376318462
>Either there's no attention or there are countless threads. Pick one, faggot.
So how does it feel to be brain-dead?

>>376318332

>when people say they have good memories of Rainbow 6
>talking about Vegas 1+2