>A crying woman… What, you think she's sad the mall's closed?
Would this dialogue get approved in this day and age?
>>376054871
Yes, Nick is a smartass, it suits him.
Nick is an alpha
Would feminists/SJWs get in a fit on Twitter about it?
>Look, Ellis! A tractor!
Nick is great.
its not really offensive if its true is it
Rochelle is the worst L4D character.
>>376056858
She's hot, though.
>DOMINATED!.. And I've been shagging yer wife!
what did Valve mean by this?
>>376054871
His character was one of the only things I liked about l4d
>>376054871
I'm sure you could shit up /v/ with twitter screencaps of a few screaming tumblr tards
>>376054871
>We'll never have L4D3
>>376054871
I always play Bill/Nick in custom campaign and versus. I find them charismatic
>>376056858
She's just boring compared to all of the other characters in the series. No fun personalities or character gimmicks like the others.
>>376054871
>Character is supposed to be portrayed as an asshole
>says assholey things
If it is supposed to fit his character then I don't see why not
>>376057321
Bill's the greatest, I always play him if I can.RIP, you grouchy old bastard ;_;7
>>376056858
Rochelle was meant to be the gun enthusiast. Not sure why they cut that off.
>>376057765
Wow, never would have suspected that. Though all I remember about her is that she was a reporter who liked Depeche Mode.
>>376057551
I love that character in the survivor setting. It takes the smallest moment of exposed vulnerability to remind you that they are a smartass/asshole because that's what's helping them cope. But yeah go figure that people today (who claim to be well read no less) would probably piss their pants over something like
>come on sweetheart, the zombies aren't gonna cut you slack because it's that time of the month
>>376057545
I'm sure if they did give her a personality people would still cry about valve trying too hard to make a black woman likable
>>376057204
it won't come before half life 3 for sure
everyone would throw a bitchfit if any other IP released by valve was given the crowning "3".
>>376057957
Talk about a missed opportunity.
>well written poc/minority/lgbt back then
>"see! this is how you do that kind of character!"
>well written poc/minority/lgbt today
>"pandering much?"
But I'm not completely sure because I can't think of a well written poc/minority/lgbt in recent vidya anyways.
>>376054871
>you'll never be lost at sea with Nick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITD2Z8pg3cM