Recently i've picked up FE sacred stones, after playing

>>375849057
It depends on what you liked from the FEs you played previously:
If you liked re-classing units, or being able to grind on world maps then try Awakening.
If you preferred the world-building and character relations go PoR, or Blazing Sword.
If you liked the cast of SD, or saw characters that looked cool but wanted to know more about try 12.

Gameplay wise: 5 ,and 10 are consistently rated the highest, but if you care about the story for either contient you should play 4, or 9 first, which I like both of, but you may be put off by 4's huge maps, and 9's low difficulty (a little higher than SS).

Awakening is probably your best bet. I would just wait for the Tellius game remakes to play them.

>>375849057
FE7, Awakening and FATES: Conquest are all delicious.

>>375850783
>Fates

Ignore this cuck. Fates is the biggest Nintendo related let down since Sunshine. Do not play Fates until you play all the other games, especially the vastly superior Awakening.

>>375849057
shadow dragon has a sequel called new mystery of the emblem
there's also Fe7 otherwise known as Fire Emblem or Fire emblem blazing sword
pick fe7 if you liked sacred stones more

Wait, are you the dude from the other day who was asking how to defeat the first general boss in FE3?

>>375850907
What are you trying to accomplish?
What part of awakening is better than Conquest's maps and/or gameplay?

>>375849057
Awakening is horrible, probably the worst game in the series. Just a really boring and tiring experience the whole way through.

>>375850585
I liked the gameplay most, i find quite satisfyning levelling and take the same units trough the whole game.
>>375851058
no, i'm not

>>375849057
play 4 through 7. Awakening and Fates are trash

Awakening is ok in every aspect but good at nothing
Conquest has good maps but a really bad narrative that wants to make you kill every character in the game and smash your head on the wall
Echoes has good everything but maps which are the worst in the series

pick your poison

>>375849057

Conquest has amazing map and gameplay, definitely worth playing, Echoes as great story, characters and is narrated very well, loved it but is more an rpg than an srpg so the gameplay is not as good. Avoid Awakening is shit.

>>375849057
4-7
path of radiance
radiant dawn

ignore awakening and fates they are trash

File: It's all downhill from here.jpg (33KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x360px

>>375851576
Awakening doesn't have shit like this or ninjas.

>>375849057
>started with SD
I'm so sorry

>>375854558
Then there's no problem about gameplay? Glad we cleared it out.

>>375852869
Ah, every single one of 4-10+12 except 6 have party members leave your party for a while, but I'd say if you're going for gameplay go for one of 7, or 9 as your next one, and perhaps 4 if you don't mind spending a lot of time moving your characters across maps

OP here, i've decided that i will play blazing blade after sacred stone, and when the i have the money awakening then fates. From what i've read fates has some characters from awakening so i prefer playing that first

>>375850907

>Sunshine

Bite your fucking tongue

>>375856282
I'd just skip awakening at that point, you're not gonna get any enjoyment from it unless it's your first game in the genre.

File: 1490241660217.jpg (66KB, 457x531px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 457x531px

>GBA FE was the only good era of FE

>>375849057
if you are a weeb degenerate you should totally try awakening and fates

>>375856282

Awakening is in a different universe than Fates. There's only crossover due to some dimensional.fuckery. Fates is pretty garbage though. Avoid that one like the plague. Even Conquest doesn't save it

>>375856631
>One good game that never came to English
>One game with a plot that doesn't make sense, characters with zero evolution and depth and which is 80%+ filler battles
>One game that's literally so easy it's boring to play as anyone but a first timer

I want GBAbbies to go and stay go.

File: 1457669035208.png (51KB, 149x169px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 149x169px

>>375856631
>mfw GBAfags think "Classic experience" means GBA games, but it actually means Famicom-Super Famicom games
>Birthright was said to be the more Classic Fire Emblem experience, and from that point of view, they might as well have been right

>People recommending 7 for "world building" or "story"
>It was famous before Conquest as having the single worst plot in the FE series as well as some of the weakest characters

I bet you these are the same people that would recommend you Golden Sun OP, people for who it was their first game in the genre and can only look at it with nostalgia.

Anyone here knows where to find an English patch for 776? The only ones I could find weren't finished

File: 1486533188305.png (79KB, 281x260px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 281x260px

>>375857571
If you want one that's complete, you're gonna be waiting for a while. IS is gonna remake the fucking game and that'll get localized before we get a good translation of Thracia 776.

File: Fire Emblem 7 Randomized_1493387732894.png (39KB, 240x160px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 240x160px

>>375857760
fuck
should I try it anyway?

>>375857274
>implying Blazing Blade was in any way worse than Radiant Dawn's abysmal story-telling
As expected of Telliusbabbies. I'm as big of an Ikefag as much as the next guy, but please do not try and pretend Radiant Dawn was not single-handedly the worst story in the series until Fates (especially Conquest, what the fuck) shat the bed.

File: 1492595987821.png (159KB, 476x345px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 476x345px

>>375856631
>Missing SNES Era
3,4, and 5 individually are better then 6,7, or 8.