Why is this game so underrated?1>2>>>>>>>>>Infinite
>>375837894
2>1
>>375837942
"No".
>>375837942
>>375837894
2>1>i
Everyone liked the first game for two reasons: writing and setting. The second game had a shitty main antagonist and few interesting supporting characters, and the level design was pretty bland, making the environments difficult to enjoy like you could in the first game.
Gameplay andoverarching storyof 2 > 1 though.
2 had the best gameplay.
5 enemies, 40 different player attacks, player moves as fast as a mollusk
its corridor shit with the same terrible gameplay design that all these games have
>le grownup little sister
>>375838276
Yes
>>375837942
Kek. Not even close.
>>375837894
>Why is this game so underrated?
Pic related brainwashed the gaming public into hating it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm9Eta491O8
https://youtu.be/s8w6hY9DtCQ?t=66
>>375839396
>>375839962
Bioshock did not need sequels, it would have been a solid standalone game.
>>375837942
Agreed
>>375837894
Bioshock (1) was known for its story and setting which distracted people from the mediocre gameplay. The second one had a shittier story and players were used to the setting so the "wow" factor was lost. The gameplay was improved but it was still far from good.
>>375837942
He's right you know
>>375840339
Bioshock 1 had a shitty story though.
>inb4 "muh twist"
A good twist=/=a good story.
2's story was far better.
>>375837942
>tfw in big daddy suit
>>375837942
Gameplay wise definitely. Story wise no.
>>375837942
This is the only correct choice 1's plot twist was fucking stupid
>>375837894
They're all shit.
>>375837894
i like it though
tonics are streamlined
you can now both shoot and do eve shit
little sisters are now actually cute
>>375842128
>little sisters are now actually cute
>>375842805
you know that 2d>3d chris
>>375840915
How can you say 1 had a bad story, but 2 had good one?
At least say both were bad.