[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]

>4th Day >4th Thread Last time we discussed ideas for

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 93
Thread images: 9

File: 165-1920.jpg (1 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
165-1920.jpg
1 MB, 1920x1080
>4th Day
>4th Thread

Last time we discussed ideas for what the next Battlefield game while still debating on if WWII was even possible. Today, rather than link the poll, I will link the poll Results because apparently he ended it before anyone could put a dent into WWIIs votes.

Source Video: https://youtu.be/UVo6hH_up5Q
Source Poll Results: http://strawpoll.me/6459945/r

So today, we have a bunch of guys who actually think World War II is a probable Setting for the next Battlefield game. What do you guys think?

I think we will be seeing the American and Pan-Asian Conflict that was mentioned in 2142 playing out in maybe a 2042, or possible 2100 Game.

I would also love to hear ideas on how you guys think they can improve for future titles, it goes without saying, that not being Battlefield 3 or Battlefield 4 obviously helps.

Thread Theme: https://youtu.be/lAxJoJc7NIU
>>
They're keeping up with CoD SO:
>Near Future
or
>Far future
Most likely back to modern warfare, but without a doubt, we will not see WWII again.
Its not in the markets ya know?
>>
you're an autist, no one cares, go post your /x/ tier theories on reddit

come back when a company announces something or they update BF4 with another easter egg like the DICE LA camo stuff you needed to do on the new map
>>
I just want another bad company.
>>
1942 > BF2 > Squad/PR > BC2 > BF4 > BFV > BF3 > BFMC > BF2MC > BC1 > BFH

Prove me wrong.
>>
>>323619329
Besides 3 being better than 4 and 2 being better than 1942, I agree
>>
>>323619329
Bretty gud list. I would place BFH higher than BF3 though Gunplay was smooth in BFH rest was just terrible
>>
File: d5olaz9.jpg (124 KB, 1280x1008) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
d5olaz9.jpg
124 KB, 1280x1008
>>323618971
Sadly this. Might as well go far future make it interesting. Mechs or power armor or something.
>>
So is BF4 good?
>>
>>323619967
Its solid now after all the patches.
>>
OP here, I forgot to mention that there was a "leak" two days ago. It could be real. You guys can have a look for yourself. It does directly mention Titan Mode and Mechs being present. For >>323619830

>>323619967
Without Premium its terrible. The DLC is pretty great though. Wait till another sale when its like 12 dollars with Premium, or just don't buy it and wait for the next one and see if it is good.
>>
File: 121354253268.jpg (10 KB, 548x451) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
121354253268.jpg
10 KB, 548x451
>>323619329
>1942 > BF2 > Squad/PR > BC2 > BF4 > BFV > BF3 > BFMC > BF2MC > BC1 > BFH
Honestly, I can't. That's a pretty damn good list. It's missing 2142 and 1943 though, put 2142 with BF2 and 1943 before BC1

Squad is pretty much PR in alpha and on Unreal engine, right?
>>
>>323619329
I feel like the only one in the world that remembers 1943 exists

Also, Bad Company 2 Vietnam is the pinnacle of the series
>>
>>323620173
There's still a handful of strictly vanilla servers you know that right? I see at least three always full when I hop on.
>>
>>323620554
Yeah, and they are full of people who paid 50 cents for the game and do nothing but cheat. Its why there are Premium Servers that don't host Premium Maps, to keep the scum out.
>>
What do you guys feel about Quake Wars Enemy Territory objectives? Do you think it's a game type worth the effort in BF5.
>>
>>323620249
It wasn't good, sure the weapons had the beefiest feeling, but map design, skybox limits and that fucking boat's 50 cal was really screwy.
>>
>>323619329
>BC2 better than BC1
How old are you guys? Seriously? BC2 was a terrible game. It turned the series into a CoD clone. BC was slow, had large maps and non retarded unlockables. Vehicles were also challenging to use.
>>
So I played BF4 at launch at a friends house and haven't played it since? Is it worth getting? I'm playing on the PC.

I've played all BF games and have been playing BC2 lately
>>
>>323622521
The only difference between BC2 and BC1 is aimable SMGs and perks
>>
The next battlefield isnt gonna be 2143, its gonna be a shitty 10 years in the future type cancer like the most recent cod games.

>>323622712
I bought it recently and got it refunded, its very active but netcode is still a little fucked on pc and in my few hours of playing most guns take an entire magazine to kill someone.
>>
>>323621105
Don't care, still GOAT.
>>
>>323622521
OP here. 22.

>>323622712
See >>323620173

>>323623290
Netcode is bad? Recently? Ummmm by recently you mean 2014 right?
>>
>>323623452
I mean last week, only half my hits would register and it wasn't on my end.
>>
>>323623534
Then you are playing on a 30 Tick Server like a retard and then complaining about it. Either that or your an Aussie with shitternet.
>>
>>323622521
BC2 was battlefield lite with a side of destruction. It knew that and didnt try to be anything else.
It did what it set out to be and did it (relatively) well.
>>
>>323623175
>BC2 and BC1
No way in hell.
The average assault rifle had 60 rounds. There was no regenerating health. The weapons had weak damage. Apaches and Mi took serious skill to use and werent nearly as restricted in BC2. You could acutally barrel roll, turn and pitch in the attack helicptors and if AA's were giving you trouble. Fly high
>>
>>323623175
Shit forgot the biggest thing was the maps were enormous for consoles. I was so disappointed with Harvester Day and Oasis in BC2. They were tiny in comparison to their BC versions.
>>
I want a Vietnam - Cold War (in which fighting actually happened) setting
I think it's the perfect blend of WW2 and modern and allows for us to play in maps all over the world
>>
>Playing Tactical Gamer Server
>Squads all required to have leaders with mics
>Required to Work Together or bannu
>Operation Whiteout
>Our squad doing Snow Mobile Patrols

Its comfy, cold, and amazing at the same time.
>>
>>323619329
>PR lower than BF2
>BFV lower than BC2
>BC lower than BC2
>Missing 1943 and 2142
Literally made by a 17 year old.
>>
Whatever happened to that police Battlefield game? Was it a total flop? I only hear 4 talked about still.
>>
>>323626713
Be glad I even included PR. Its not even Battlefield, its a fucking Mod for Battlefield. Vietnam was shit tier. The horrible Propaganda speakers and the lack of things to do ruined it. I am talking about the actual one mind you, not the BC2 one. BC1 was shit. I did forget about 2142 and 1943 though. My bad.
>>
How the fuck is 1942 the best one?
>Shit AI
>The campaign is just playing matches in order
>>
>>323629126
it's old, therefore its the best
>>
>>323627026
a lot of people bought it but they all stopped playing in like a month
it's honestly pretty fun but it's literally dead on PC
>>
>>323627026
Hardline has a surprisingly long single player campaign.

Multiplayer died a few months after release. Some of the concepts were good, but there just wasn't enough main content like maps and modes to keep it going.
>>
I just picked up BF4 Premium Bullshit Edition and was pleasantly surprised. I remember playing a little at one point and it just being a rougher BF3 a couple of years ago. How much is the game getting fixed and how much is me?
>>
>>323619329

>missing 2142

shameful.
>>
>>323618713
>Dragon Valley 2015
>Actually sounds like music and not somebody farting into a broken radio
Shit, does this mean that the next Battlefield might go back to having real music again?
>>
>>323630861
Even the DLC had actual music m8

>https://youtu.be/9xgidpOevgQ
>>
Anyone can give me tips on how to fucking win a match in BF1942 in 100% difficulty? The AI of your team is useless, so even if you capture a point they lose it in half the time it took me to take it
>>
>>323630991
>That
>Music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0a
XAm0jqd0
Also, why is it that all the modern combat stuff in BF2 still feels so much cooler than the games that doubled down on the setting?
>>
>>323631295
Because Rose Tinted Goggles.

https://youtu.be/EeKF-60uq_M
>>
>>323631404
>Muh nostalgia
I was too late to PC gaming to have ever played BF2 at its peak. That said, you did finally post a piece of music.
>>
>>323618713
I just want another WWII game so that I can use the M1 Garand. Vidya needs more PING these days
>>
>>323631868
Is there a more satisfying sound? I think not.
>>
>>323631975
No, it makes me want to waste all my ammo.
>>
>>323631868
>>323631975
>>323632592
https://youtu.be/YRKNciPt3iA
>>
>>323632826
I came.
>>
>>323628856
>All this awful taste condensed into one post
Absolutely appalling.
>>
File: 1446698350172.jpg (347 KB, 1936x1936) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1446698350172.jpg
347 KB, 1936x1936
>>323635254
DIFFERENT OPINIONS
GET HIM
>>
>>323635668
Yea, you sure got some dogshit opinions buds.
>>
I feel Dice tune infantry combat according to feedback from people who play nothing but 24/7 metro/op locker.

shit sux.
>>
I want a longer TTK back like the older games.
>>
All I'm saying is if they made new games like the old ones as in WW1/WW2 area or even an all zombies games I might actually start playing them again.
>>
I want properly designed maps where infantry and vehicles fight side by side in perfect harmony. and less levelution gimmick shit.

also would it kill them to add some fucking gore? when i bodyshot some jarhead with a tank shell i want him turned into pink mist.
>>
>Final Stand DLC was technically near future
>It was the best Expansion/DLC DICE has ever released
>People aren't even halfway hyped for a Near-Future with Mechs and Titans

Guys pls
>>
>>323625069
Everyone played Arica Harbor, Port Valdez, or Valapariso anyways.
>>
Are they even going to bother with an sp campaign this time around?
>>
>>323636846
you forgot Heavy Metal
>>
>>323636775
I liked it, but I hope they atleast go far enough to have Mechs and Titans otherwise I will be a bit upset.
>>323636965
They said the reason they didn't for Battlefront was because they wanted to focus on the Competitive Aspects, so I could see them (hopefully) doing the same thing.
>>
>>323636716
Frosthype is a dogshit engine, I doubt it could handle gore ontop of trying to look good and having something close to barely working netcode.
>>
File: 1452547331372.png (281 KB, 535x466) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452547331372.png
281 KB, 535x466
>>323619329
>BC1 that low
>BF4 > BF3
>>
does BF4 have any pretty snow maps?
>>
File: 1452250480590.gif (94 KB, 325x244) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452250480590.gif
94 KB, 325x244
> not wanting another Vietnam battlefield with choppers blasting 'it ain't me' on the ride to objective B with updated gunplay

One can dream
>>
File: 1419782428602.gif (982 KB, 270x177) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1419782428602.gif
982 KB, 270x177
>>323622521
>console exclusive
>shooter
>joysticks
Please stop
>>
>>323637182
>BlueFilter 3
>Better than anything
>>
>>323637228
Go watch Final Stand gameplay and decide.
>>
Is there a good reason for Battlefield campaigns to focus on a squad? They are always character focused but they can't write interesting characters worth a shit
>>
>>323637182
All BF3 has over BF4 is better maps

They both have their fair share of shit maps though
>>
>>323637576
Better than BlueFilter 4: Wubstep & Filters Intensify
>>323637685
Just proves my point, BF3 is objectively better
>>
>>323637952
>Wubstep
Maybe in select parts of the single player and trailer
>Filters
What? BF4 doesn't have any filter, unless you turn on post-processing, or shit like that, then it's your own fault
>>
>>323637080
>lol I'm parroting things i've read on the 4chan
>>
File: 1410126560229.jpg (22 KB, 348x343) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1410126560229.jpg
22 KB, 348x343
>Dice will never make bad company 3
>tfw if they did it would just be bf4 le comedy edition
>>
>>323638235
And the things I mentioned aren't real?

The engine doesn't run that well.
The game doesn't look great with all the retarded filters and lens effects
The netcode runs like ass, and always has in BF games.
>inb4 muh tickrate servers
Not every server runs on higher/maximum settings, which they should.
>>
>>323637952
BlueFilter 3 had some nice maps but BF4 premium literally shits on that blue mess of a game
>>
Would giving you 3 gadget slots break the game?

Its annoying having to drop the 40mm GL for defib + med bag.
>>
>>323638901
>Being useful to the team by taking the 40mm GL
BF needs to go back to having more than 4 classes.
>>
>>323638901
>Wanting Assault to be even more OP
>>
>>323638463
>The engine doesn't run that well
Every game I have played on the Engine runs at 100+ FPS. Every single game. I have a 970

>The game doesn't look great with all the retarded filters and lens effects
Lens Flare I will give you, but other than that? It looks fine. I used SweetFX to make it less Desaturated, but other than that, looks fine.

>The netcode runs like ass, and always has in BF games.
This meme has been going on for months even though the problem has been fixed for months because almost ALL SERVERS on the PC run at 40 to 120 now. There are not very many, that get traffic, that still run 30. Stop this shit meme.

>Not every server runs on higher/maximum settings, which they should.
What the fuck do you mean by this? Servers can only control PostFX and Depth of Field.
>>
Which gamemodes do you guys like? I don't touch anything except rush and conquest.
>>
>>323639760
Last thing I heard about Sweetfx is that the game would kick you or report you for modding and thus ban you.

>netcode meme
Except it isn't. 40 is still laughably low, and there's plenty of servers at 35. On the other hand I see plenty of 100+ servers completely empty. Either way, the game needs to standardize a high tickrate, not have a huge varying of options to run at.

>What the fuck does this mean
Well if you could read, you might be inclined to think I was still talking about netcode and tickrate.

As for the OP, I think it's abit funny that WWII has the largest votecount considering the weapon and vehicle customization that's ridiculously large in BF4 will be small/non existent compared to a WWII game. Besides, you'd think people would be ready for 2143.
>>
>>323640425
They don't. I have been using SweetFX for 2 years. I have never been banned.
>>
>>323640742
Well, that might be reason enough to play the game again.
>>
>>323640827
They banned people for it in BF3 for about 2 weeks. Then the backlash got so big they fucked off. Not only that they don't even use Punkbuster anymore, they use some other shit that isn't a buggy mess and actually bans cheaters.
>>
Vietnam.

We're going back to Vietnam.
>>
>>323641038
Here's to hoping it's more life BFV and less like the BC2 expansion (the flamethrower can stay).
>>
>>323641038
I would give them this. It would be the least expected. It could also be really nice if they did it right, but I just don't see why they would set up Naval Assault and all the Easter Eggs in the Final Stand DLC if it was just to go back to IT AINT ME.
>>
>>323627026
Loved it. Still do. Problem is EA sucked dick at marketing it (one of my friends thought it was dlc) so no one bought it. No dlc servers on PS4, so if you were dumb enough to buy Premium like me, you're fucked. PC is a ghost town. It's a shame too, because its really fun and makes a lot of great improvements to Battlefield.
>>
>>323641994
If it weren't for the campaign, they could have sold it as DLC and nobody would have thought much of it.
>>
>>323641994
>>323642740
I actually think it was done on purpose so they can just repurpose those employees to DICE LA and have them do Side Content for the next Battlefront/Battlefield Games.
>>
>>323622712
>>323623290
This guy is a worthless retard, ignore him. The REAL problem is that the vast majority of servers are conquest and like a handful of rush and team deathmatch. Want to play any of the other 10 or so modes? SHIT OUT OF LUCK

The game also has a huge problem in that no battle ever feels close. It's always a one sided stomp that at some point might flip yet plays like a boring turkey shoot or a hopeless grind.
Thread posts: 93
Thread images: 9


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.