is there any reason why you wont be seeing blade runner

If it gets good reviews I'll see it in IMAX, and I don't see many movies.

>>87806164
No I'm going with my dad who love the original.
He's not a big fan of Ryan Gosling but he likes Jared Leto.
Hopefully we can have a fun time together.

>>87806259
>He's not a big fan of Ryan Gosling but he likes Jared Leto
What a strange sort of faggotry

>>87806164
It looks awful.

>>87806312
He's my dad.
I give him a pass on anything.

>>87806357
I miss my dad. He would have liked this too.

File: asian-ford.jpg (127KB, 533x671px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 533x671px

If there was a reason that would be the fucker in the picture. i grew to truly hate him

>>87806424
Why does he have that awful heather gray hanes T shirt on in the promo shots? He looks like he just rolled out of bed on to the set. And the rest of the sets/costumes look amazing, I don't know what the hell they were thinking.

>>87806398
Lol my father kept nagging me to see the first one after telling him about the sequel with Harrison Ford.
I'm sorry your father isn't around.

>>87806164
>Prometheus destroyed Alien
>Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull destroyed Indy.
>Star Wars Prequels destroyed Star Wars
>The Hobbit seriously damaged Lord of the Rings

no , Bladerunner is all I have left .. this fucking unnecessary movie will not be raping Bladerunner away from me,

>>87806671
If the reviews are bad I'm not seeing it and I'll pretend it never existed because the final cut of the original is one of my favorite films.

>>87806164
yeah i don't pay money to watch films

can't care about reviews, even if it gets railed, gonna see it.
Just to remind, original 80s one hasn't warm wellcome either. It was initially panned and had mixed to bad reviews, over years grew into cult status.It was also box-office bomb, barelly passing it's budget.

>>87806164
It's doing to be another shitty attempt to make money on nostalgic retards.
If you are seriously paying to see sequel/reboot/remake you should consider killing yourself.

>>87806164yeah I'll wait for it to be shown on the netflix sub I already pay for thanks.

That sub that, incidentally costs a third of what a single cinema ticket would cost. For an entire month's viewing.

>inb4 you pay when you can pirate!
Yeah, it's worth the tiny bit of money for the sheer convenience.

>>87806824
The original with the narration was truly hard to watch, it rightfully bombed. But, hopefully we don't have to wait for a "fixed" version of this film.

>>87806596
Is it because he was black?

Never saw the original.

>>87806941
No.
His favorite movie is Taxi Driver.
I like to think he's more a patrician than I am.

>>87806951
The final cut is a great movie with a great soundtrack, better if you're drinking scotch while you watch it. Needs a decent home theater to do it justice. It would suck on a laptop, completely pointless.

File: 1474046725313.gif (2MB, 210x155px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 210x155px

>>87806164
it has blacks, women and possibly gay fags in it
reeeeeeeeee enough with the SJW propaganda!

>>87806542
Fanboyism strikes again, they didn't dare tell him to dress up properly, because look, it's Han solo. That guy is a jerk who doesn't give a shit about anything, looks very arrogant. i don't like him at all. I don't even know why Han Solo became a big thing, he was an asshole in the movie.

>>87807101
Gotta tick those boxes!!!

I don't watch the trailers but i will check out reviews, if that film is a reboot, I'm considering skipping. i'm tired of this meme of fake sequels

>>87806164
well I didn't see the original in a theater so maybe I'll watch the sequel in a theater.

>>87807163
It's a true sequel.

>>87806164
because its a cash grab

>>87807479
Isn't every movie technically a cash grab though, except maybe indie art bullshit

File: bladerunner-ryangosling.jpg (67KB, 1192x696px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1192x696px

>>87806164
Yes, exactly one. He's been on so many shit in the past few years that I can't help but see the actor instead of the character. Regardless, I feel he will fuck it up so bad.

>>87806164
I'll wait for the reviews. If it turns out to be yet another shitty sequel I'd rather not sully my memories of the original.

>>87806164
I go to the movies literally weekly and I'm still not sure I'll see it because it looks kinda crappy.

>>87806424
PART TIME

>>87806205
THIS
I WANT TO ORGASM HEARING THAT SYNTH MUSIC WITH THE BASE TURNED ALL THE WAY UP AT 200 DB

>>87806671
But Villeneuve is a good director.

File: IMG_2744.jpg (106KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 960x960px

>>87806398
is this the dead fathers general?

>>87806164
I was not wowed by the first movie, even if some of the performances were notable. I never "got" the hype over it, and understood it even less after I watched the movies.

I don't like, or consider Ryan Gosling a draw.

The propped up corpse of Harrison Ford is depressing.

File: ana-de-armas-gq-0816-07.jpg (81KB, 703x896px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 703x896px

I'll watch it for Villeneuve and her.

>>87806671
The prequels were pretty okay I suggest you watch them again after ten years of meming and not actually watching them

>>87808981
>Everything about her is brown down to her clothes
Sad!

Does anyone have the webm of her pretending to be Keanu's daughter?

>>87809031
>prequelfags
Pls

>>87808981
her skirt appears to have become unbuttoned. i hope someone lets her know before she goes out in public like that

>>87809057
fucking homo faggot

it doesnt play any of the arthouses I frequent and since I'm extremely wary of rowdy/unpleasant crowds at multiplexes which always ruin any moviegoing experience I will probably wait until bluray rip

Ridley Scott has dementia

>>87809126
Mandatory penis inspection will definitely be in effect

>>87806259
Is your dad a homosexual? Seriously asking

I don't have much hope in it because the script isn't based on a Philip K Dick novel and is instead an "original" Hollywood script. The original film's brooding aesthetics owe much to PKD's tone and the trailers and advertising have shown to me that they completely missed the mark in that regard.

I work at the theatre so I'll catch it for free anyhow. Gonna predict a $600m+ box office hit for it tho.

I'm pretty skeptical. It all looks too clean and stylized. The world of Blade Runner is a cyberpunk shithole. The sequel world looks like something from Tron.

Also, judging from the trailer, the story is gonna be simplistic as fuck. Jared Leto creates a bunch of replicants to take over the city and sends them after Blade Runners to take them out from the inside or some shit? And Gosling needs Ford because he can't trust anyone on the inside? Only guessing, but I cannot give less of a shit.

Also, Harrison Ford can't act.

I can't wait for all the casual Blade Runner fans to come out of the woodworks when they see this movie.

>>87809261
>Gonna predict a $600m+ box office hit for it tho.
I hope it does something like this. Villeneuve should spear head the new age of blockbusters now that Snyder and Nolan are gearing down.

>>87809126
same, i can only go to arthouse matinees. everything else is just too awkward

>>87809261
It's not. Blade Runner will perform exactly 50% as lucratively as Tron Legacy did.

>>87809348
>Nolan gearing down
Anon Dunkirk made 5 times it's budget already and it is STILL in the theatres.

>>87809261
the original had barely anything to do with dicks novel

File: br_statue.jpg (954KB, 1768x742px) Image search: [Google]

954KB, 1768x742px

>Runtime: 2 hours and 43 minutes
The film will be pure visual storytelling with the usual Villeneuve slow tension building narrative and /tv/ will immediately call it "boring" and "nothing happens" because they expected explosions and heavy action because of the mismarketed trailer.
Screencap if you want.

>>87809306
It's clean because they're trying to make the globalist future they have planned look good

>>87809467
Yeah but it's telling of Nolan reaching the arthouse stage of his career. Making these blockbusters is mentally and physically demanding. Unless you're a machine like Bay, you'll burn out after a couple. Villeneuve is still fresh off the boats. He can make great things for some years to fill the void of his two WB predecessors.

>>87809306
Harrison also is 70 years old or some shit and has a slipped disk in his spine. I'm pretty sure he still needs to take painkillers for the pain.

>>87809478
That's why I mentioned PKD's tone in the following sentence. If you've read a couple of his works, it's clear that his tone was heavily influential in the making of the film. Minority Report really nailed it down in that way too.

>>87809561
It's going to be good. Unfortunately the pleb masses might hate it because Villeneuve won't shove quips down their throats every five seconds but it's going to be good if it's on par with his previous films.

File: bravodeakins.jpg (909KB, 2500x2100px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 2500x2100px

the original film depicts a gross, dingy and depressing hellhole of multicultural globalist dystopia, allowing for absurdly rich, dense and layered visuals that meshed gorgeously with the vangelis score

the new film has already shown us exactly what it will be, sterile and clean digital photography in cleaner environments because the multicultural globalist future must not be portrayed negatively, jared leto with "le SPOOKY white contact lenses" as the spoopy creator man and harrison will show up in the last 30 minutes for some shitty CGI explosion chase scenes

the female lead will be more pushy and independant, and don't be surprised to find some half assed twist in the final act since after all this is a denis villenueve capeshit-lite endeavor

>>87809891
Someone who is too dumb to capitalize his sentences actually thought this post was clever or convincing.

File: 1465217752586.png (221KB, 401x317px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 401x317px

>>87809938
punctuation? that's all you have?
wtf i love capeshit now

>>87806164
I don't pay to see movies. Ever.

As much as I enjoy the Lovecraftian mythos, I don't believe this adaptation can live up to the original.

>>87809992
I mean this faggot is actually desperate enough to shitpost that he's starting to call Villeneuve capeshit.

Go make another Thor shilling thread. I know it has made you very upset that the board has turned against your turd Marvels but don't try to infect other films with the same cancer Disney brought.

File: 1505056160739.jpg (187KB, 1740x1729px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1740x1729px

>>87809891
>4 entirely different locations on the left
>2 on the right with 3 frames of same
fuck off

>the multicultural globalist future must not be portrayed negatively
How is a completely empty and sterile environment a positive portrayal?

>some shitty CGI explosion chase scenes
Almost every single shot you've seen from the trailers is completely practical, Villeneuve hates working with CGI and green screen and only uses it when absolutely necessary,
And considering that the film has an enormous budget I'm sure he made it exactly like he wants it too.

File: 1505586039538.jpg (206KB, 1028x1500px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1028x1500px

>>87806164
1 hour in paint

>>87807122
He's an anti hero, but he learns to be a better person in the end. Lucas scripted it that way on purpose he said so in an interview with Joseph Campbell

>>87809891
>>87810076
Are you honestly surprised by this? The original movie was depressing as fuck, no way people would see a sequel where they'd want to slash their wrists afterwards.

>>87810013
That's why we have only degenerate capeshit today, no one is paying for anything, not even for what they like so the studios had to resort to making films for literal millenials and chinese men to break even.

>>87810076
He's going to reply with a reaction image and something something capeshit. Just wait.

>>87810122
Pretty sure this sequel will be equally, if not even more dark in terms of it's subject.

>>87810065
i don't watch comic book movies because i am not a manchild, villenueve is basically capeshit without the capes so i will not pay to see his films either
>>87810076
i am literally laughing that you think these shots are somehow an improvement, this looks no better than an episode of black mirror and the defense force for this film really comes off as legit shilling

>>87810202
Still this dumb faggot that can't capitalize or even write coherent arguments. Ok we get it. Your cherrypicked shots are destroyed the moment they are approached in context. You can stop try now. Go fuck off to the Spider-Man thread now.

>>87809891
i'm not on board with all that /pol/ shit (I just think it's uninspired cinematography/set design/art direction), but this pic accurately sums up why the movie looks pretty bland

>>87809891
Did you even see the short with Batista?

>>87810474
based harrison wearing a t-shirt and jeans

File: bladerunner2049comparison-14-1494534367306_1280w.jpg (73KB, 1280x396px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x396px

>>87810379
dude chill out i'm sure you will love the movie no matter what, if anything you should feel sorry for me

>>87806164
no Vangelis soundtrack
no prime Ridley Scott
Jared Leto
Harrison Ford is 25 years too old
Autism poster boy Gosling
CGI shitfest overload

how the fuck can this movie even succeed

>>87810076
is that katy perry?

DROPPED

>>87809891
>Back in early high school
>Parents leave for 2 hours on wednesday to do shit
>Use it as an opportunity to watch all the R rated movies in the house
>Start watching Blade Runner
>Fast forward to all the nudity because I'm a horny teenager with no (easy) access to internet porn
>Hmm, wonder what the actual film is like
>Try watching it
>Get bored and depressed
>Fast forward it to the end and pretend I watched the whole thing

>>87806671
don't forget Ghost In The Shell

>>87810564
a lot of people don't like it the first time(me included) but upon multiple viewings the artistry and craftsmanship is really incredible
the story and dialogue is pretty mediocre but the other aspects are so great its elevated to at least an 8/10 in my eyes and a classic

>>87810528
Both of these shots don't look particularly good.
Also it's pretty stupid to analyize film sequences by cropped screencaps.

>>87810548
>no Vangelis soundtrack
Anon Vangelis is a 74 year old fuck who didn’t make anything relevant in a decade or two.
At best he would make a forgettable soundtrack that tries to hard to be like the original just like Williams did that for TFA.
>no prime Ridley Scott
He's just an executive producer, Villeneuve has full creative control.
>Jared Leto
Hating on Leto is reddit, he's fine when directed good.
>Harrison Ford is 25 years too old
I agree
>Autism poster boy Gosling
Fit's the Blade Runner perfectly.
>CGI shitfest overload
Almost zero to none CGI

>>87806164
Yeah, I can't be bothered

>>87810076
It's like a hack imitating an auteur and Scott isn't even an auteur

>>87810076
Left: Film
Right: Digital

Guess which looks better? Film. Digital sucks ass.

>>87810958
They look different because of clearly different take on lighting, pretty sure Deakins could pull off the same exact look if he wanted too autist anon.

Will prime Leto show his Philip K. Dick soon? Clock is tickin, m8.

>>87806671
>Star Wars Prequels destroyed Star Wars
>children actually believe this

>>87811044
lmfao

>>87810516
So fucking cool. Epitome of cool. Makes me want to see all the new Star Wars movies. I just love Star Wars, I love it when I Watch Star Wars. Star Wars
Watch Star Wars. Watch Star Wars

>>87806164
I'll only watch this if Harrison Ford lazily mumbles and narrates the whole thing like the original

>>87810672
Same here, i tried to watch it several times but always get bored before the film gets started. Thanks to the final cut it's much more watchable without voice over I gave it a new try and was completely absorbed. This film requires a level of maturity. Pats a certain age, it can be a very good film.

can we talk about why WB decided to make this in the first place?
the original movie was a bomb and only managed wi become a cult hit among white males years later
>Budget $28 million
>Box office $33.8 million
women don't seem to like it or any PKD hard sci fi, so there's really only one demographic who cares at all
WB somehow thought this would be financially a strong move? the trailers are extremely uninspired and don't inspire much hope(sets/visuals/the composer got fired and replaced with hans zimmer LOL)
i don't see how this does not perform poorly at the box office

File: maxresdefault.jpg (29KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1280x720px

Aside from its visuals, the only thing worth noting about the original movie is a few scenes, most importantly pic related.
This scene is one of my favorite of all time, it completely flips the viewer's perspective of Roy as an antagonist and Deckard as the hero, by having Roy explain his immense fear of death that has driven him to do all that he had up until that point.
The way Roy phrases his fear of death, by juxtaposing it with his vivid memories that he treasures so much, to me is beautiful. The track playing is also quite nice.
Sorry for the long post, I think Blade Runner 2049 will much more shallow than the first, but I will most likely go and see it anyway.

>>87810076
Reddit: The Post

upvoted and shared via Twitter, reblogged and liked on Facebook.

File: 1492297059877.gif (494KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 200x200px

>>87810474
>as he stepped out solo

PAUSE! All jokes aside, I swear I read "erection" instead of "reaction" for the first time.

>tfw somebody is paid to write "articles" about how celebs dressed in any given day

File: 1504062726865.jpg (552KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1920x1080px

>>87806164
I have 2 reasons. The first is that this is a Sony production. That means that it is guaranteed shit. They are the worst studio in movie making history. The second reason is that I'm dreading the normiefication of Blade Runner if by miracle the sequel turns out to be good.

>>87811248
It's just WB trying to cash in on Harrison Ford. They figured he's done with SW and Indy, this might be one more thing they could get him to do before he croaks and make their own scifi blockbuster universe with, which is why they got the Goose since he'll draw in young females.

>>87811248
>become a cult hit among white males years later
What a retarded thing to say, this movie has become a classic and has inspired countless of artists all over the world

>women don't seem to like it
So what? we can only watch garabage tailored to the lowest common denominator aka homo popcornicus? You would have wanted a female lead to make sure women watch it and a black sidekick to ensure those black males who don't care about BR do? This is greedy Hollywood exec mentality. It's just plain stupid.
BR failed at the box office was ahead of its time, and it was a dystopian future while people wanted more enthusiastic sci-fi like Star wars

>>87811262
>nearly one hour after
>still assmad about having been BTFO to smithereens
>still samefagging
you're reaching new highs in pathetic; let it go.

>>87811475
i am talking from a purely financial standpoint, most films now that succeed on a big level get around a 50/50 split between genders
white males are the only demo that actually care about quality, that's why hollywood films are bombing left and right nowadays because they are shit and have alienated the previous target demo of tastemakers(white males)

and as you say the majority of people don't want depressing, they want something more clean and upbeat which is what this new film is looking like(at least in comparison to the original) but they don't like blade runner to begin with so i really don't see how this won't perform on a mediocre level especially in the USA

>>87806671
>>87806671
YOU CAN'T SAY "DESTRYOED"
OR YOU'RE A VERY IMPRESSIONABLE PERSON
THEY'RE JUST FORGETABLE

NOW, I WOULDN'T TRUST SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN WAITING FOR THE CRYSTAL SKULL TO JUDGE THAT INDY HAS BEEN DESTROYED WHILE THE TEMPLE OF DOOM WAS .... FORGETABLE

>>87806164
I thought the first one was really boring.

Also fuck theaters. Why do people let the establishment cuck them. I will watch this mediocre pleb installment in my personal kinoplex.

>>87811876
I don't know about you anon, but I don't have a 2 ton IMAX analog projector along with the 98 feet high screen right at my home or a living room with perfect acoustic treatment and a sound system with multi-thousand watt amplifiers and speakers even behind the screen which has microscopic holes throughout for the sound to get through.

the lack of ana pics is disheartening

>>87806164
>spending shekels to see (((movies))) in the (((movie theater)))

>>87810958
I'm shocked the difference is so fucking blatant.
Funny since Villenueve/Deakins always got such praise - though desu I was more impressed with the cinematography in "Prisoners" than I was with "Sicario"....

Also Arrival's cinematography seemed pretty bland despite getting an Oscar nom ("Arrival" as a whole was overrated as fuck)... though Deakins didn't work on it.

But seriously, that pic exemplifies why I will always say film>digital with a few exceptions (i.e. Chivo)

>>87806164

That's a nice dress.

And no, that's not enough for me to go see the movie. It'll be shit.

>>87806164
Sad that Ana de Armas only got the role for eye candy. She's a terrible actress.

>>87809891
>>87810076
your pics comparisons are not fair
whatever: the new one is going to be a fail
no doubt


https://twitter.com/iTunesTrailers/status/908359704639766529

>>87812123
You are aware that that entire short is not a part of the movie? And that it is directed by Ridley Scott's son just for marketing purposes? Literally no one involved in this is involved in the actual film, except for Bautista ofcourse and he's better with every performance he makes.

>>87811920
>poor people
Let me guess American?

>>87811960
You notice the difference too right? Digital Autist fanboys keep saying you can't see the difference or that it's better than film. Lmao these people need to get their eyes checked, nothing matches the cinematic look of film.

>>87812032
yeah oscar award winning actress jennifer lawrence would have been better

>>87811920
Yeah neither do I. I have a $250 Dell monitor and some Logitech speakers with a sub, about $50 bux. This is literally all you need when you're sitting 2 feet from the screen.

Shit, movies look even better on my display, because it's not projection. It's bright and crisp and very colorful. Modern digital movies shot on those RED cameras look gorgeous.

File: image.png (495KB, 411x549px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 411x549px

>>87806164

shocking lack of anaposting itt

>>87812293
>Shit, movies look even better on my display, because it's not projection.
Anon I hope you're baiting because if not then you're an actual retard

>>87812277
She's actually a better actress than Armas. I have follower her since her beginnings in Spain and she's trash.

File: image.jpg (137KB, 740x948px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 740x948px

>>87812356

>>87812376
Go ahead and explain how projection is better. I will wait.

>b-b-b-but light reflected off a wall is seriously better anon!

>>87812293
>Modern digital movies shot on those RED cameras look gorgeous.

Oh look it's a cringy RED fanboy.

Everyone knows Arri Alexa is better.

>>87810562
that's mackenzie davis, muh waifu.

>>87812463
and everyone with a brain knows they are both shit

>>87812269
Yeah. Like I said, digital can look good, but film actually has that painterly quality that can really set the mood and help further cinema as an art.

Digital can look pretty but its all too crisp and clear, to the point where it often just looks like real life.

>>87812202
explain to me for what reason would a limited plot like this one - a shitty muh 6 gorillions if my brain is still working - not be a glimpse of the shitty plot that's coming?

>>87812508
This. But watch for the digital fanboys telling you you're wrong BECAUSE DIGITAL IS HIP AND COOL JUST LOOK AT THE NAME RED, SO COOL AND ITS NEW TECHNOLOGY AND YOU CAN JUST ADD FILM GRAIN IN POST RETARD.

Doesn't interest me.

>>87812449
One of the most basic explanations would be that if a movie is filmed on film you willl be experiencing a digital version of it, while a proper projector will show the true analog "film". Dunkirk is a recent example.

>>87812542
Wow, you get it. But the digital kids always say there's no difference, lmao. Digital looks too clear and dull, and looks like it's trying to imitate real life. Film has a crisp rich texture to it, and it makes a film look more cinematic and an experience, something to escape to.

>>87812545
Because it's not written, shot, directed by anyone who is involved in the actual film. It's literally made just because Ridley Scott is the executive producer and he managed to slip his son in the marketing so he can have fun pumping out a few whatever shorts with a few actors from the actual movie.

>>87812639
Agreed.
Maybe that's why I prefer old movies to new ones.

>>87812596
They've been converting film to digital for decades. Did you sell your DVD player and go buy a reel-to-reel when you made this discovery anon? No?

Projection is shit, and most movies aren't even shot on film anyways. I actually watched Super Mario Brothers the other day, a movie shot on film. The film grain and all the scanning errors transferred fine, it's good quality. I wasn't even aware that movie had a DVD release.

>>87812503
PICKED BACK UP

File: mackenziedavis.jpg (151KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1920x1080px

>>87812503
>mackenzie davis
does she have a glass eye wtf

>>87806164
>In cinemas
You mean the theater

>>87812684
Why do you think digital fanboys say they can't notice a difference? I can't actually believe that.

And why are they so elitist?

>>87806164
I will absolutely have to see it. I just hope it doesn't suck. Bladerunner is the first movie I remember seeing beginning to end as a little girl. I was like, four, or something. My uncle had a super-rare and expensive Betamax player he'd bring over and we'd all watch movies. (Pirated, of course.) I watched this, then Silent Running. Funny how there was this one day I fully remember films. Leave it to me to have Lady Elaine Fairchild nightmares, but be perfectly fine with things like Bladerunner. *shrug*

File: 1784874476399.jpg (2MB, 2026x1653px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2026x1653px

>>87812673

mmm k.
(doubting doubtly)

>>87812865
i assume its amatuer filmmakers who use digital themselves and use youtube tutorials on how to perfect teal and orange color correction lmao

>>87813063
That's it. That's exactly it. Faggot amateurs who think their short films made on RED LOOK SO COOL, like this one:

>>87812293

>>87813063
>teal and orange color correction lmao
The "teal and orange" is just a complimentary colorway in color grading that's been used from the start of the use of color in any art form, but autists on the Internet like you caught up to that only a year or two ago and now just screech TEEL AND ORAMGE just because they heard of the term somewhere and thinking that that some kind of argument. Embarassing.

>>87813170
Look, you got one of the Digital amateurs triggered, kek.

File: baby-dinosaur-laugh.gif (483KB, 207x154px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 207x154px

>>87813170
ok is this a fucking pasta? i've seen this like 10 times this week lmao

>>87813063 (You)
>>87813138 (You)
how pathetic can a samefag be

File: chrome_2017-09-16_17-09-20.png (8KB, 383x114px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 383x114px

>>87813362

>>87809891
All this show is that Fluorescent>Incandescent.

Also they decided to doge the LED meme.

Bretty gud.

File: 52156.jpg (28KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1280x720px

>>87813362
Look it's trying to think

>>87813138
>manbabbies favorite capeshit was filmed on something other than RED, the superior industry standard.
>"waaaaaaah FUCK YOU"
God damn, the state of these bitches. Sorry your favorite movie is a washed-out mess.

i'm waiting for some reviews first. i'll see it if it's lovecraftian

>>87808981
Which GDP scene is this?

>>87813723
>RED, the superior industry standard.

*Inhales*

>>87810767
Vangelis' Rosetta album from last year is actually pretty good

>>87810958
this guy gets it
this
plus the muppet show's always better than cgi
the internet is for porn

>>87814065
Unfortunately there are morons entering the industry advocating digital and for the death of film, so as bad as movies are today, just wait 10-25 years.

>>87810958
Film>digital is one of the /tv/ memes that I 100% unironically agree with.
>>87814065
Same with this. The special effects in 80s movies look better to me than the Pixar crap they do now. 1977 Star Wars looks more 'real' to me than 2016's Rogue One.

>>87814414
The new Blade Runner has almost zero CGI, all practical set pieces

>>87814414
>Same with this. The special effects in 80s movies look better to me than the Pixar crap they do now. 1977 Star Wars looks more 'real' to me than 2016's Rogue One.

Holy fuck you get it.

And Cartoons look better than CGI animation shows
And practical effects look better than CGI which should only be used when absolutely necessary.

But your wrong saying it's a /tv/ meme to know film is better, a lot of autists here say digital is better, but then again that may be reddit posting here.

>>87814466
Fuck off Villeneuve

>>87812639
>>87812684
>>87813138
>>87814065
>>87814505
>Wow, you get it.
>Agreed.
>That's it. That's exactly it.
>this guy gets it.
>Holy fuck you get it.
>all in less of an hour

Anon contain your turboautism, this amount of samefagging is ridiculous.

>>87813507
More important than light technology was the actual use of colored lights as no detailed retouching could be done practically with film stock.

>>87814709
Digital fanboy triggered, lol.

>>87814723
You think the films of today don't have colored lights?
Anon today you have lights where you can pick any shade of any color you want, if anything colored lights have improved vastly

>>87814762
I think it's time you go to your mommy and take your meds

>>87814897
*inhales*

>>87806164
The original movie was boring as shit and only praised because it was the only real sci-fi film for twenty years besides Gattaca.

Is Villeneuve really a hack? He seems like a guy who honestly does his best, but his best just ain't worth much.