So what is with the blatant corporate shilling of IT , or is

WB just hire really bad shills who make no effort to be subtle.

>can't practically filter a pronoun
>filtering images is not an option even though this an imageboard and the tech is available
>astroturf posts are careful to not use filterable keywords
it's hell

>>87538133
IT'S A FUCKING LEGIT GOOD MOVIE, STOP BEING A CONTRARIAN FAGGOT.

>>87538133
I honestly have no idea what the fuck is up with the shills. Not promoting free discussion on here is really gay tho. The movie however, imho, was a solid 5/10. Bad pacing, underwritten characters, shitty references, and tonal imbalances plague it.

>>87538133
>>87538201
Reminder that calling people shills who liked a movie is unequivocally not an argument

>>87538133

I thought that pretending to astroturf this movie is the new meme on /tv/.

File: vlcsnap-2017-06-20-02h44m46s088.png (688KB, 1200x738px) Image search: [Google]

688KB, 1200x738px

>>87538215
No. No it is not. And the more you say it the worse the backlash is going to be once everyone realizes it's not an 8/10

Why are people on a forum dedicated to television and movies talking about an anticipated movie the weekend it opens?: the thread™.

>>87538133
It's breddy gud, especially Bev.

>>87538294
If they liked it they would argue more with counterthreads

>>87538201

This. Disney is the same. I think Sony might be the worst, though - whoever they hire seems to just try and make everyone upset to try and drum up controversy and pretend that it's hype - like that whole Girlbusters "drama".

>>87538271
this

>>87538215
lel

>>87538328
No one was anticipating this movie. At best it was cautious optimism that it would be complete shit.

>>87538448
>No one was anticipating this movie

Uh huh.

>>87538294
It's not that they liked the movie, it's just the tone and style of their posts. I couldn't logically describe it to you if my life depended on it, but there's just a certain way of digitally "speaking" that people who have been here before tend to have, so when it's someone's first day on 4chan their posts tend to stand out. A lot of the positive IT posts have that artificial marketing tone to them. Again, obviously I have no way of knowing for sure, but that's just the vibe I get.

>>87538328
>anticipated movie

literally nobody gives a shit about it though. Only hype I've seen for It has been artificially created through reddit/4chan/youtube shillings.

I can't think of a single person who would legitimately be excited about a shitty reboot to a shitty 80's horror movie based on a shitty book

>>87538448
Dude, fucking what? Everyone and their goddamn mom was talking about it from six fucking months ago until now!

>>87538476
Glad you agree with me.

>>87538505
No they weren't.

OP confirmed Philistine kek

>>87538500
>Reddit
You have to go back

>>87538448
>>87538500
Utter delusion. Care to explain why this rated R Horror film is gonna make Capeshit levels of money this weekend if nobody cared about it?

>>87538497
Absolutely. They reek of corporate BS. Like an AMA of someone with a facebook profile of themselves

>>87538328
the volume of threads is ridiculous and unusual

>>87538539
Yes they were. And you know it.

>>87538497
>>87538505
I can't tell if this is a perfect example of what I was talking about or someone helpfully creating a perfect example of what I was talking about.

File: 1448176513641.png (2MB, 764x1294px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 764x1294px

>tfw considering watching this movie but don't know whose shilling to trust

>stop liking what i don't like

>>87538558

because it's not you fucking retard. reddit is retarded and constantly falls for any type of "hype" which is probably where most of their money will come from, but outside of that I doubt it's making anywhere close to capeshit level money

>>87538664
Just watch it and form your own opinion you sad fuck

>>87538497
>>87538559
>>87538645
>translation: there didn't say cuck nigger or faggot enough and they liked something mainstream REEEEEEE

File: 1498612412515.jpg (13KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 225x225px

>>87538133
>i will never be payed to shitpost in favor of shitty new movies or anything at all
I'm fucking jealous of you shillfags on this board.

>>87538599
You can't invent retroactive hype. Did the WB PR Edu-Drone not teach you that?

>>87538722

It's a pretty dead giveaway

Marketing is a normie profession, and normies can't hide their inner pleb for very long once you engage them in conversation

File: 1490593177754.jpg (44KB, 613x635px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 613x635px

>live in the middle of bumfuck nowhere
>no cinema
want to see

>>87538664
Do the smart thing and watch the free trailer before you spend money on the movie. Trailers are commercials for movies. If you didn't like a trailer for a movie, you're completely justified in not paying money to watch the movie. On the other hand, if the trailer looks good to you, then by all means give it your money.

This weird notion that you "can't just not see a movie because of its trailer!' never made any sense to me. Obviously you can't write a complete critical review of a movie without seeing it, but when it comes to deciding whether or not you, the consumer, decide to buy your movie ticket to go see it, the trailer is all you have to go on, so making the decision based off of the trailer is a completely logical decision. Get it?

>>87538674
>Reddit's mostly responsible for the $100 million IT's gonna make domestic this weekend alone
Top fucking kek

File: 1502062908543.jpg (65KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1280x720px

when the bluray rip comes out every blob cuckbeard faggot crying "s-shill!" will suddenly be sucking it off. makes you think.

screencap this

I only saw it because the gift certificates my sister gave me expire soon and nothing else was on.

It was decent enough for what it is, i probably would spend $18 to see it. but it was enjoyable.

6/10

>>87538839
wouldnt*

>>87538497
I can describe it logically. Knowing it'll just make shills better at their job.

It's because the posts aren't saying anything specific, meaningful, or debatable. Its just a long string of different ways of saying "i liked it," over and over. Which, thanks to marketing, there are a fucking ocean of ways to say. Then if they do mention any sort of negative aspect, its just a tactic to make the post seem genuine and not overly positive.

So the only two possibilities are either the internet is filled with tons of people who can't say anything meaningful or someone was paid to post the long meaningless post. Either way its bad for 4chan.

>>87538722
I've actually seen several posts using the word "cuck" that I would bet small amounts of real money on being fake. I'm not talking about dumb meme words or over-the-top offensive language. It's not as concrete as that.

>>87538812
That's the exact fucking opposite of what you should do. Never watch trailers for a movie you want to see

>>87538816

>blob cuckbeard faggot

See, now you're trying too hard.

>>87538856
not everyone is a fucking movie reviewer. you can just like something without really knowing why or having detailed explanations.

>>87538784
Way to out yourself shill. No one fucking asked if you were going to see it you dumb cunt.

>>87538813

how much are they paying you to spread lies on the internet? because I will pay you double that if you go away and never post here again

>>87538856
except that most of the posts praising the movie have mentioned specific scenes
what the fuck are you talking about?

>>87538774
to be fair, these are mostly indians. Evident in how they'll consistently start acting like the weekend is completely over early sunday, the numbers for saturday are already in around noon, and the movie is already in full release a day before its actually out.

and being indians, their handler would have to explain what cuck nigger faggot meant and the proper usage of them or they'd just come off even weirder.

>>87538315
It actually is lol

File: t_1487950687515_name_Screen_Shot_2017_02_24_at_10_36_44_AM.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

Whenever someone praises a WB film, this is what they look like

>>87538133
Just look at how much traffic 4chan gets nowadays
This is the cheapest and easiest way to influence young impressionable people, video games and movies are especially easy to convince this demographic to go and spend money on.

>>87538942
I've seen lots of threads and posts mocking specific scenes, and counter-posts saying that the scenes were actually scary and not funny, but it was the detractors who initially brought up the specific scenes, not the promoters.

>>87538942
scenes that were in the trailer.

Also you did notice how there are a lot of little camrips of specific scenes, right? But no actual camrip? And they all seem to be from the same (incredibly shitty) source?

Shill strategy briefing.

Just got back from watching it and I liked it. Especially all the kids' interactions, it really took me back. Not gonna watch part 2 if they're adults though, that sounds lame

>>87538201
>>87538271
>>87538382
>>87538448
>>87538497
>>87538559
>>87538568
>>87538645
>>87538674
>>87538745
>>87538774
>>87538856
You're memeing right? Like, there's no fucking way you actually consider somebody saying they enjoyed a movie on 4chan as some marketing conspiracy. This can't be real.

>>87538988
OBJECTION

that is clearly a household in the continental united states.

Why the fuck would you pay to market a film on a board that 80% of its user pirate media?

>>87539025
I went into how an ocean of posts that are nothing but "dang i liked x" is still pretty obnoxious and bad for 4chan.

>>87538947

I was thinking probably Filipinos or Taiwanese, but yeah whatever the case, there's definitely a slight idiomatic language barrier.

I mean I understand that getting 5 bucks a day for a desk job with a western corporation is hitting the motherlode in those places, but it really fucks with the experience of visiting this site, makes it just feel like any other social network when it used to feel like a forum.

>>87539055
Because its cheap and that other 20% exists. This is an extremely popular website

>>87539011
No? There have been plenty of posts that spoiled things like what the leper looks like, the ending of the movie, etc.

>>87538861
I agree completely, modern trailers spoil way too much. If you already know that you want to see the movie, then my advice doesn't apply at all. I'm talking about people who are unsure of whether or not they want to see a movie. Trailers and word of mouth are all they have.

>>87539055
They'll market any place they can.

This film wasn't bad. In fact it was better than the original. The original was made under an obvious cheap budget, with shit tier actors, aside from Tim Curry, which basically made the move. The movie was based on an original novel by Stephen King, which everyone knows. Practically all of his movies are cheesey but if you appreciate the storyline, you can somehow overcome those lame moments where you can't help but laugh. This time around though, they certainly paid homage to the original film. Not only that, the effects were on point and rolled pretty well overall with the flow of the movie. There was a nice balance between the overkill of CGI work and the authenticity of the storyline. IMO people were excited to see this remake due to its originality of the plot, and what I mean by that is not just another paranormal shitivity or Annasmell movie. It was creative and enjoyable. 8/10 in my book.

>>87539025
4chan isn't a secret club with ten people on it nowadays, it's a huge fucking website that's acknowledged as a taste defining phenomenon on the internet. Why the fuck wouldn't people shill here?

>>8753834
That's the problem with "argument" fags and molememe watching aspies. Not everything is an argument.
One doesn't need to reply to an argument with a counter argument at all.

Or do you not understand that "I like this movie and found it good" can't be deconstructed? No one needs to tell you why they like anything at all ever.

>>87538922
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=it.htm
http://deadline.com/2017/09/stephen-king-it-home-again-box-office-1202163667/
Heres some actual sources you stupid fuck

File: the-other-fat-man-at-the-computer-photo-u1.jpg (36KB, 650x485px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 650x485px

Was there a meeting with the studio saying they specifically need to market to pic related?

>>87539055
Because you pay the people doing it half a penny per post. Compare that to the price of just a single movie ticket.

>>87539100
The gangam webm came from a youtube video that is nothing but that scene

>>87539025

Mate it's at the point now where it's reminding me of the Mad Max and Star Wars days. It's the most transparent shilling we've seen in a long time on this board.

Unless you're trying to tell me that you don't believe viral marketers use 4chan? Or are you just not aware of the way that industry works?

>>87538133
>implying that /tv/ has any relevance at all

>>87538206
>filtering images is not an option

download 4chan x, familia

>>87538856

another shill tactic I noticed is that if they say anything negative, it will almost always be something that could be seen as a positive to pretty much anyone just spun to sound like it's coming from a dumbass. Best way to explain is example:

>I hated it, it had too many jump scares and scary scenes!
>2/10 the clown was too creepy which scared my little brother. Warning: Do not take your children to see this!
>The actors were too beautiful, it made me feel bad about myself
>that movie was boring. It doesn't deviate enough from the book and relied too much on creepy atmosphere rather than good storytelling

>>87539117
If I'm unsure then I'm sure the trailer will just ruin the movie. So I just wait till I can watch the movie then decide if I want to spend money on it.

Weird how that works, right?

>>87538745
Go on Mechanical Turk, accept jobs from certain Requesters for maybe three months, build up a reputation, and you'll be contacted by email for side jobs. This is a booming industry in the current era. Get on board. It just takes a little initial investment.

>>87539166

Why do you think there's basically been a permanent thread devoted to the underage redhead ever since the shilling started?

>>87539142
>it's a huge fucking website that's acknowledged as a taste defining phenomenon on the internet. Why the fuck wouldn't people shill here?
What drugs are you on right now dude

>>87539150
You just made a decent argument for there not needing to be any sort of discussion at all.

Which would beg the question, why go to 4chan? There are tons of neutered versions of 4chan that just do the safe/funny parts of classic /b/ and NOTHING ELSE if all you want is a few sensible chuckles while you're winding down from your long day at work.

>>87539234
They dont need to market the redhead. pedos were going to see it anyway just for her.

>>87538906
will u buy me ticket

>>87539173
okay...
and that was in a trailer, was it?

File: 1504361638654.jpg (83KB, 310x310px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 310x310px

I'm going to break your fucking minds.
The shills aren't the people saying they like the movie. The shills are the ones screaming shill.
From a marketing point there is no better testimonial than a heartfelt one. So by crying shill they're making you do their job.
Screen cap and share so that shills need a new strategy.

>>87539304
Its pretty obvious who is a shill and who isnt, it depends on how they respond to you.

>>87539262

Not if they didn't know she was in it. Hence the marketing.

Jesus, it's not like it's hard to spot.

>>87539253

Literally millions of unique hits per month. Neutered clones don't get anywhere near 4chan's figures.

>>87538568
Not really, it's the only wide release movie coming out this week and despite what morons are insisting, it is an incredibly hyped movie.

>>87539207
If you want a 100% reliable way to form your own opinion of a movie's content and not rely on other people's subjective criticism, a trailer is all you have. Yes, trailers can be deceptive, but you are seeing the things that the marketing guys think will get you to see the movie. Your participation in the market will determine whether or not they're correct.

>>87538328
this. Its a good movie get over it

File: Untitled.png (458KB, 1344x560px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1344x560px

>there are no IT shil..

>>87539183
>dude the movie was just a series of creepy scenes with very minimal story!

>>87539389

explain to me why nobody in my family, or my social circle has ever mentioned one thing about this movie coming out?

Not a single person has ever said a single thing to me about this movie till I stepped online

>>87539297
No, it wasn't in any trailer. If it was, we'd have had an HD version for a long fucking time

File: 1504378545585.jpg (41KB, 460x345px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 460x345px

>>87539253
Why do anything at all ever? You're going to die and given enough time no one will remember you.

>>87539505
>pretending you have a social circle or that your parents want to talk to you
lel

>>87539505
are you fucking serious?

Every normie i know who is under 30 has mentioned IT.

My snapchat is just fucking full of people saying they are seeing it and how much they are scared of clowns.

>>87539304
>dude stop talking about shills

... uh huh...

>>87539505
All I get from this post is that you're an extremely secluded individual

>>87539567
>My snapchat
I'm fucking dead

>>87539387
I was asking why come to 4chan if you aren't a marketer.

>>87539593
What are you? some loser who doesnt have friends who use snapchat and insta?

>>87539569
>literally says share
>is about shills
>so it would continue talk about shills
Did I just find a literal for realizies IRL retard? I think I did.

>"viral marketing" months and months ago with false flagging news with "clowns in the woods" to get buzz on facebook and social media
>actually surprised they would be hammering reddit and 4chan with shills all saturday hoping to convince people to go see it tonight

I bet they are getting paid overtime for working on the weekends

>>87539438
>the only way to determine if a movie is good is trailers

... who the fuck, other than a marketer, would say/think this?

Your fucking argument basically makes movies themselves totally irrelevant to whether they're good or not and all that matters is the trailer.

File: Homo.jpg (19KB, 313x305px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 313x305px

>>87538133
Probably some of the most blatant astroturfing I've ever seen for any non-Marvel film. It's so fucking mediocre and it's working off of existing material, so if you praise the story you're not even praising the film. The acting is atrocious, terrible script, awful Pennywise, not scary, hilarious wiggling kills any and all intensity of every Pennywise scene etc.

Shills need to fuck off, seriously

>>87539527
the post I was responding to claimed all the "shills' only talked about scenes that were in the trailers
that's been proven a lie, and on top of that why would they spoil parts of the movie that isn't even out of theaters yet?

>>87539649
trailers should only be used to judge the atmosphere and visuals of a film and should not include plot points or anything that gives away too much.

>>87539633
>dude if you talk about shills you're a shill so don't do that!!

>this isn't telling people to stop talking about shilling

>>87539567

This. Every male between the 18-34 demographic loves this film. I keep hearing about IT on my Facebook and Twitter feeds!

>>87539691
That's a pretty stupid thing to say, as its impossible to not show a plot point, as plot points will be the parts of the movie with the most craft put into them.

These days, of course.

>>87539658
>acting is atrocious
Yeah, that's fucking horseshit. The kids all did great

>>87539484
>wondering why the biggest movie of the weekend is being talked about so much on a movie messageboard on the weekend it comes out
Its time to go outside m8

File: 1479332945132.png (866KB, 812x924px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 812x924px

Oh God this movie is going to be so scary.

>>87539797
FUCK OFF SHILL REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>87539772
They literally didn't. Finn, Sophia and the kid who played Eddie were fine. Everyone else was a typical child actor. I can't blame them, they're fucking kids, but that doesn't mean they weren't bad.

File: xsqeezme.jpg (49KB, 700x628px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 700x628px

>>87538133
is this your first day on the internet

shit is everywhere and has been for almost 20 years

>>87539649
Holy God in heaven, I've never seen anyone as stupid as you are on the internet. I'm talking about ways to determine if a movie is WORTH YOUR MONEY TO SEE, which categorically excludes you PAYING MONEY TO GO SEE THE MOVIE. Can you fucking dress yourself in the morning?

>>87539691
nigger that only works if you think of movies in terms of "do I want action shooty movie today or comedy fuhnay movie? Do I want a movie with a romance focus?"

If you're actually looking for MOVIES THAT AREN'T SHIT you'll watch just about all of that anyway.

>>87539815
go outside and while youre out there might as well go see IT cuz youll have nothing else today since youre a loser you may be able to relate to the losers in the movie, faggot

>>87539850
You know piracy exists right? You can see movies before you pay for them?

Hell, you can even get your money back within 15 minutes from the theater chain. They'll even straight tell you to just go to another movie if you want, so they can keep the money.

>>87539896
Are you the snapchat guy again? If so, you're a fucking comedic gold mine.

>>87539699
Go read the post again until you actually understand it. I won't even insult you anymore. I feel sorry for you.

>>87539924
Why would you pay money to go see a movie that you already pirated? I mean, okay, if you see a low-quality pirated version of a movie you might be compelled to go see the real thing afterwards, but typically the point of piracy is to completely avoid paying any money at all.

And even if you did go to a movie, it was shit, and you got your money back, that's still two hours of your life you burned away on nothing, when you could have spent two minutes watching the trailer and saved yourself the trouble.

>>87539961
>post is unequivocally saying calling out shilling is shilling so stop!
>DUDE READ IT AGAIN LMAO

... its also worth mentioning that 4chan shill tactics are pretty straight forward and simple. Since they don't have to actually convince people shilling isn't happening, they'll just keep making threads and keep them bumped. Thus what motivates posts like these. >>87539961, >>87539633, >>87539304

>>87538315
What backlash chief? There will be zero backlash. There's always zero backlash.

Faggots.

>>87540085
he never once said to stop
are you a pathological liar or a genuine downie?

>>87540095
Personally, I stopped watching films 3 years ago.

>>87540061
Negro, you are, at absolute best, saying that carefully crafted commercials for movies that will show you only the good parts and none of the bad parts (often all of the good parts in the case of modern comedies) is the only way to determine if a movie is good. And by good, I mean, worth money, as that is what the term means in our modern nightmare reality.

You're either a marketer or retarded. Which is the underlying implication of calling someone shill, that they're either marketing or fucking stupid. So it amuses me to no end to see people stand up and insist, with great determination, they aren't marketers.

>>87540123
>dude if you say shill you're shilling and helping shills to shill!

You're either so retarded you don't even understand what you wrote or >>87540085 is correct.

>>87540225
>doesn't address content of post
>instead deflects to something else
pathological liar it is

>>87538133
maybe its actually just good

>>87540095
Good point, as backlash is a next-quarter problem.

Next quarter ain't worth thinkin bout till next quarter

>>87540085
I never said stop. In fact I'm pretty sure I said to screencap and confront them with it "so they change tactics" or something along those lines.
Seek help immediately.

>>87540307
can't say till ya see it

is there even a camrip? Nooooope.

File: 1501436200107.jpg (14KB, 300x295px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x295px

>>87538133
Remember that boxing match thing that blanketed the entire internet for a week? I can't even remember the time before that when some shitty boxing match ever made the news. Same thing happened then. Just a shit load of paid shills all over the fucking place.

>>87538215
Actually, it is terrible. Are you 12?

>>87540400
It was the last math of the best boxer currently still active maybe all time so it was understandable.

>>87538300
No, that's actually a legit tactic for getting people to shill for you. They did it for that emoji movie too.

>>87540471
Naw, just paid shilling is all it was. No one irl was even talking about it and I live around sports freaks that love that sort of shit.

>>87540486
I think you're just misunderstanding that 4chan shills don't have to actually think about what they post. Just keep posts on the front page.

>>87539246
Hes right. The same happens on reddit.

>>87540187
Remember when the Ghostbusters trailer came out? And when it got such a calamitous negative backlash, because it was showing parts of the actual, terrible movie? Do you know what people involved in the movie started saying then? They started saying, "Judge the movie on its own merits, not by the trailer!"

One of the points I'm making is that if you decide whether or not to see a movie based purely off of the trailer, that is completely reasonable. I'm also saying that if you're worried about shills or paid critics or anything like that, if you DON'T trust other people's opinions, a trailer is the best piece of information you have as to a movie's quality before you watch the actual movie. There are other pieces of information, like the cast or the director or the screenwriter, but plenty of good actors and good directors have been involved in bad movies.

Keep in mind that the post that started this whole chain of discussion was someone saying that they didn't know whether or not to trust the comments they were seeing online because they weren't sure who was and wasn't a shill. That was the context of everything I've been saying.

>>87540616
>point out shilling on reddit
>get downvoted to oblivion and banned by the clickfarm army

File: you need to see it.png (5KB, 409x95px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 409x95px

>>87540616
>>87540647

>>87540624
actually after the terrible trailer the marketers started telling people that all criticism was from straight white men (the evilest people ever) and to go see the movie anyway as a fuck you to them.

And besides, you're inadvertently making an argument that movie quality is irrelevant to movie quality, and all that really matters is trailer quality.

>that one angry anon finally went back and read the post and stopped responding
hheeheeehhheee
:^)

>>87540789
>that shill who knows he just needs to keep the thread bumped

File: 125215616.png (154KB, 376x754px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 376x754px

LIKE IT OR NOT, THIS MOVIE HAS HAD THE BIGGEST SEPTEMBER OPENING IN HISTORY OF CINEMA

>>87540844
Thanks inflation and $30 movie tickets

>>87538133
I thought is was good though.

>>87540875
No 3D or IMAX though. That's a huge handicap

>>87540875
>Thanks inflation and $30 movie tickets
My cinema dropped its price down to $12 when I saw it on opening night

Face it, heaps are loving this movie

>>87538215
post cam, i will be judge of that

>>87540714
>you're inadvertently making an argument that movie quality is irrelevant to movie quality
Holy Christ on a cross, no I'm fucking not. Can you grasp the context of what I'm saying? Like, do you understand the difference between saying that a movie itself is irrelevant to its own quality and saying that a trailer is a good indicator of whether or not you'll enjoy a movie? Do you understand that those two ideas don't even exist in the same fucking solar system? Let me spell this shit out for you.

Okay. If you want to form an opinion on a movie's quality, watch the movie.

If you want to make an educated guess as to a movie's quality, WITHOUT SEEING THE MOVIE BECAUSE YOU'RE TRYING TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO SPEND YOUR MONEY, a trailer is a good way to inform that guess.

What the fuck is so hard to understand? Given the parameters that were established earlier in the discussion (don't trust other people's subjective opinions) what else besides the names attached to it can possibly tell you whether or not a movie is worth spending money on? That decision is something every consumer has to make before they go to see a movie in the movie theater. That's what spending money to see a movie is. It's taking a risk by spending your money on something that could be shit, and there are various factors that can inform you as to the chances of the thing you're spending money on being shit. One of those factors is the trailer. Are you capable of comprehending this?

File: 2017-09-09_18-30-55.jpg (36KB, 357x990px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 357x990px

This has to be some kind of record.

Lmao why are people so butthurt something other than capeshit did well? Is it because no one would see it with you?

>>87541096
hi shill

HOW TO SPOT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHILL AND REGULAR RETARD WHO HAPPENED TO LIKE THE MOVIE:

Shill:
>I like IT. What a great movie, the acting, the pacing the jump scares were all great.
>why is everyone shilling this movie?
>OMG REE RETARD EVERYONE LOVES THIS MOVIE WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT. LOOK AT THESE MOVIE REVIEWS ALL POSITIVE 90% ROTTEN TOMATOES AND THIS IS THE GREATEST MOVIE EVER THESE NO SUCH THING AS SHILLS EVERYONE IS ALLOWED TO LIKE WHAT THEY WANT YOU'RE JUST MAD PEOPLE LOVE THIS MOVIE

Normal retard (non-shill)
>I like IT. What a great movie, the acting, the pacing the jump scares were all great.
>why is everyone shilling this movie?
>Idk
>thread dies

>>87539025
you're an idiot if you think there's no astroturfing on 4chan

>>87540400
Paqeal Vs Mayweather (i dont care how you spell either of their names). You've had to have heard of it. This one was mayweather's 50th game which would've been his 50th win in a row vs an accomplished MMA fighter in his first boxing match on top of unsteady race relations. The race relations thing is probably why it was all over 4chan for the most part.

>>87541026
>a trailer is a good indicator of whether or not you'll enjoy a movie
this is never true unless you're a fuckwit

Earlier (>>87539438) you also said that trailers are 100% reliable, the only way to form your own opinion of a movie. This is also laughable.

You also don't seem to know what "inadvertent" means.

>>87540535
people at my college were all talking about Pacqiao vs Mayweather, I assume they were talking about McGregor vs. Mayweather irl too. Leave your basement sometime

>>87541906
Because it was all over their facebook and twitter feeds.

The fight was brought up in this thread because unless you had a phone jammed up your ass, you didn't hear (or care) about that shit.