Has there ever been a theatrical feature film made entirely with

There are those thumb movies, same concept

>>87516047
But they're not sock puppets, though

>>87514266
>If no, why not?
I guess it's because it's hard to get sock puppets to show emotion. Just ends up looking comical.

>>87514266
Sockpuppets are all too busy over on /pol/

No because it wouldn't be Crescent fresh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPdL365sje8

It's not socks but they're hand puppets, does it count?

>>87514266
Rabbits is the closest I can think of

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqFe5IpPYZQ

File: H1FP25Iy.jpg (42KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 512x512px

It would take a real visionary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NKUf57mwcU

>>87516482
Same concept as in using cheap objects with limited emot but I do think sock puppets can show fair amount of emotions. It would really all come down to the writing and for it to be shot with real production value. Like actual sets and proper lighting with a good camera and lens.

Nothing cheap like >>87516917

>>87517121
>cheap
Dog rapin time

>>87516837
It would be supercres.

>>87514266
Quentin "when I see feet i go full pajeet" Tarantino would do it

I want a movie where one character is a sock puppet and the rest of the cast dont acknowledge it. they just act serious like its a human.

>>87516917
Is that Knox from knox's Korner?

>>87514266
pitch it to Sony

>>87517144
Make purses with me Mick