When do the paparazzi overstep their bounds? When is it OK t

>>87510008
>pushing someone until they fall down
>kicking their ass
nigger

this is my favorite one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4sdfcrycEU

>>87510060
>guy wants to fight you
>shove him to the ground and drive your knee into their sternum
>he whinges about you assaulting him
thats an arse kicking

>>87510008
>When is it OK to lay your hands on them?
All the time.
Even when they're not on the job.

>>87510806
this. they should live in mortal fear.

>>87510008
>When do the paparazzi overstep their bounds?

When they trespass on private property.

>When is it OK to lay your hands on them?

Never.

>>87510197
>[YouTube] Tom Cruise pissed off! (embed)
>pissed off
I mean I guess he's probably feeling pretty mad, but he doesn't seem to show it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvjD0SkoFr0

File: 1504677198952.jpg (113KB, 750x700px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 750x700px

>watching angry celebrities compilation
>Mexican paparazzo in his car outside Miley Cyrus's house
>she comes up to the window and begs him to leave, pleads him to get a good job
>tfw I'm jealous of a fat Mexican scumbag because he gets to have a candid discussion with a superstar
I hope the T Swift groper at least got some stink on his hand

>>87511120

video?

File: 1496806657413.jpg (201KB, 870x720px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 870x720px

Any legal form of employment with the economic justification of having its goods/services in high enough demand to support its own existence without outside support is a form of employment that at the very least deserves to exist.

That being said, Paparazzi are literally human-parasites.

By the nature of the job it attracts the sleaziest, most conniving human turds to the profession, and the profession itself encourages the suppression of whatever few ethics that shitty person still retains.
They also contribute nothing to society in any way that justifies their existence. While their service is in demand enough to at the very least support their existence, that demand is created exclusively by the lowest, least-intelligent echelon of society. Literally nobody with an IQ above room-temperature cares enough about Scarlet Johansen's new hair-cut or getting to see pictures of Tom Cruise while angry his meal at a restaurant was interrupted in order to go "Yes, the existence of these shitty photos justifies you sleaze-balls constantly harassing people and invading their privacy."
Paparazzos are one step beneath random-call Telemarketers in terms of contributing zero to society and actually instead creating a net-negative effect by existing.

If you're a paparazzo, you have the same legal protection as any other human being. And yet all the same, I legitimately hope that at some point you get your ass kicked. Because you legitimately deserve it.

>>87510911
WHO SAID THAT

>>87510911
>make a hole gentlemen

>>87511160
https://youtu.be/djZKPcvJDpc @12:25
Sorry mobile

>>87511163
>"Yes, the existence of these shitty photos justifies you sleaze-balls constantly harassing people and invading their privacy."
The hundreds of millions of dollars they are paid to be part of literal idolization does actually justify it

>>87510197
desu can u blame them

that shit could have been acid or piss or some shit like that

>>87511362
I dont get the laws of paparazzi..

why is it okay? they literally stalk people and hide in bushes and shit and try take photos of them in "bad" situations like egging them on and shit..

you'de get arrested doing this to some random civ, why because these people are on TV is it allowed?

>>87510008
>When is it OK to lay your hands on them?
any time you see them

>>87511362
>creeping up to celebs with camera in face asking what they want for christmas

wtf it must be unnerving being famous

Who the fuck cares
Why do you retards sympathize with rich psychopathic famous attractive assholes
faggots

>>87510882
loser

>>87511501
I've never understood it either. It's like there's a different law for famous people.

>>87510197
Based Tom putting some Britcuck in his place.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKWzHe4Hl5A

this is how you treat paps

Oh no my poor little rich famous celebrity has to deal with cameras outside of work
OH THE HUMANITY

>>87511560
>HURR you don't even assault people?
>Loser!

Dope.

>>87511559
edgy

>>87511614
>says the faggot that defends modern day gods and wants to assault normal people and break their cameras

>>87511611
you're a loser for using the law as your entire basis for morality

>>87511634
edgy

>>87511681
Are you a waifufag or something? You're literally mentally ill.

File: 1503393680266.jpg (9KB, 320x197px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 320x197px

Who was in the wrong here?

>>87510197
He handled that pretty well to be quite honest.

>>87510197

>American teaching europoors some manners

>>87511362
Who is the last chick? I'm gonna make her my new waifu.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puNuSUY5R68
Who was in the wrong here?

>>87512134
I bet missing the actual hit there lost him a shit ton of money

>>87510197
Guy probably went home, killed his wife and kids and then himself after that.

>>87510197
I just noticed he's touching the guys hand the entire time

>>87512289
it was a chick

olivia lee

>>87511362
>He just ran away from me in an airport, I'd like to remind you of that.
>Your fault, not mine.

ngl I laughed

>>87511362
we live in such a celebrity worshiping society its kind of funny to see how some of these paparazi just really don't give a fuck about fame, they aren't start struck at all

File: 1504469480227.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>87510197
>why don't you shoot yourself

>>87512701
this, paparazzi are based. Fuck these overpivileged celebrity faggots complaining about people giving them attention lmao

>>87510008
>Any touching without lawful defence is an assault.
>Provocation is not a defence but may contribute to a reduction in sentence.
So basically never in public and that bogan could sue the camera man because he struck first although it would likely be messy.

File: 1501578912168.gif (44KB, 400x204px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 400x204px

>>87510911
>watch this video on YouTube