Will it be genuinely insightful or heavy handed liberal trip

>>87391983
>A Film by Angelina Jolie
What the fuck do you think

Coke skellington Jolie has never had an insight in her life

>>87392002
Might be pleasantly surprised. The trailer is good at least

>>87392022
t. shitflix
i didn't click on it btw

>netflix
>actor directing
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA
yeah mate, you're walking out of your living room a new person

>>87392044
If you're that autistic just watch the kinocheck upload
>>87392067
Netflix is just a source of funding, it doesn't say anything about the film

>>87392089
>kinocheck
yea, hard pass on that too sararigirl

>>87392089
>Netflix is just a source of funding, it doesn't say anything about the film
>people who are putting in the money dont have any say in the product
just fuck off shill you're being retarded now

>>87392140
Ah yes (((((they)))) are tightly controlling the nature and content of this film about a country 95% of their audience have never heard of and will not watch

trailer looked good desu

OP looked like his lack of opinions is fake desu
i manually typed out desu too
since only fags talk in faggot acronyms

>>87392238
what the fuck are you trying to say

>>87392238
>OP looked like his lack of opinions is fake

wut?

OP being evasive speaks shittily of the product he's sponsoring
I can't trust opinionless faggots who are so easy to rustle about the shitty content of their openers

looks typical netflix bad

Is there anyone more insincere than an Angelina Jolie joint?

>>87391983
>>87392002
>>87392015
>>87392022
It received a standing ovation at the Telluride Film Festival.

>>87392421
OP

>>87392421
netflix

>>87392421
bluray box print designers

>>87391983

>liberal

It's anti-socialist.

It's going to be roundly rejected by critics because Muh Privilege and Muh #Resistance and Muh UBI memes.

>>87392002
She has done some good films surprisingly, this might actually be good

>>87392701
liberalism is inherently anti-socialist, outside of your God-forsaken continent.

Yes, let the hot tandem of Jangelina Olie and fletnix surprise you, you never know when it might not be exactly as you expected it would be

>>87391983
>set in Cambodia during Khmer Rouge
>no Sinn Sisamouth soundtrack
coulda been pure kino

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXPuITCyyg

>>87392799
nah fuck that i'll trust my own judgement over some random comment on the internet that could literally describe anything, and may or may not be true.

>>87392824
kek
>>87392727
To be honest I haven't seen her movies, but they look like flicks at best (and are rated accordingly).

Hmong tribe royalty were paid off by agents of Central Intelligence to fight and kill other cambodian tribes who fought for Ho Chi Minh. After the Hmong and americans of Central Intelligence lost the Indochina war, the Hmong extended royal family where relocated to pittsburgh to be raped by niggers as seen in Clint's Angry Old Armed Republican movie. The rest of the Hmong tribe were left in Cambodia to rot. Jolie's adopted gook(s?) is/are Hmong. This movie isn't about everything laid out in this post.

>actress directing
>Jolie wasn't even a very good actress
Such a shame. This movie could have been pretty interesting too.
Also, what are some good documentaries on the Khmer Rouge? And what are other good documentaries about the rise of communism in general? I remember I once saw one on BBC about China and the cultural revolution. It was pretty long but interesting as fuck. If only I could remember the name.

File: 1442157170264.png (45KB, 1140x798px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1140x798px

>>87392824
why did they kill him bros

File: (((the_msm))).jpg (2MB, 6256x3240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 6256x3240px

>>87391983
lol, what do you think?

>>87392782
you mean europe or US? because most of eus government is openly liberal and pro-socialist.

>>87392782
classic liberalism is, but they hijacked the word to mean full-stretched socialism now

File: 1504614228929.png (2KB, 238x56px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 238x56px

>>87391983
>I am so obsessed with my American political sports teams to the point where I need to filter everything I see through degrees of "liberal"-ness or not.

>>87393182
fuck off /pol/ack

>>87393021
I sometimes wonder if people like you think you are actually smart when you post these image macros. Like do you slightly nose breathe laugh and raise an eyebrow like a smug faggot, or what?

>>87393216
>t. confused

>>87393223
i'm around stormweenies alot, in short, yes they do.

>>87392782

Sure, I was using the Burger Version of Liberal. AKA leftists.

>>87392976
>he thinks Jolie is a bad actress

>>87393268
>I was using the Burger Version of Liberal. AKA leftists.
Ah, so you don't know what you are talking about?

>>87392444
What doesn't receive a standing ovation at pretentious film festivals?

Probably beast with no nation (the idris elba african netflix movie) tier

File: 8282881f4259c32cb0311538a32a0541--begin-again-pol.jpg (36KB, 426x312px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 426x312px

>>87393013

Literally "Privilege".

They didn't have white people in Cambodia, so they ranked everyone by education or income levels.

If you were wealthy and intelligent, you had to make amends for your privilege by becoming a New Person and getting shipped off to pay yo reparations in the fields like a true nigga.

If you did something uppity like count or read, you got the bullet.

>haw haw i post opposite of whatever u say good discoostions
y are neckbeards so lonely they will settle for an irrelevant jolie vanity project to intellectually fondle each other's manbreasts?

>>87393302

We're on a burger website. So we should speak in Burger.

>>87392015
By the Sea was a reasonably intelligent satire of European arthouse, something you rarely see come out of Hollywood.

>>87393348
>(((tips))) pshhhhh it's like, pretentious you know? Teehee ;) I'm too le smart for independent kinos.
>(posts next /got general/ and Snyder thread)

>>87393399
how do you judge a satire's reasonableness? who teaches you to think and talk like that?

>>87392444
Heavy handed Liberal tripe then

File: brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-how-6-kids-feel-about-marriage-ffn-ftr.jpg (64KB, 600x411px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x411px

>it's an Angelina Jolie pretends to care about immigrant children' flick

>>87393466
>how do you judge quality

>>87393494
very well then, how do you judge the quality of reasonableness of a satire, do tell

>>87393546
How do you judge anything?

So is this like a feminist version of Beasts of No Nation?

>>87393563
Judging you is pretty easy, plebbo

>>87393563
i can judge you have nothing with your instant retreat into generalisation. why do you even bother posting if this is all you can bring to the table?

>>87393600
>>87393614
How do you judge the quality of reasonableness of me, do tell

>>87391983
it will be shit, as everything around her existence

>>87393616
you used reasonableness to describe satire was the first fucking giveaway. then you followed up with trying to squirm your way out of it, pathetic showing retard.

>>87393633
Where does this meme come from? Are all of you this underage?

>>87393657
I called it reasonably intelligent, in fact.

>>87393659
Does it feel good stuffing your brain with shit?

>>87393491
Yes, I guess adopting and raising all those third worlders was just a gimmick. Far be it from our autistic brains to consider that maybe other human beings care about kids, amirite?

>>87393657
Not him but what's wrong with calling something reasonable?

>>87393679
Can you name me three movies with Jolie you've even seen?

>>87393675
As opposed to unreasonably intelligent satire? Try to win just once.

>>87393379
It's not because they were privileged specifically, it's because Pol Pot had that idea of primitivist communism but figured out that educated people and city dwellers would be hard to persuade to live in shit and toil at the fields all day for the greater good.

So he decided that killing them all is the natural course of action.

>>87393704
I think English isn't your first language
>2. to a moderate or acceptable degree: fairly; quite

>>87392444
>It received a standing ovation at the Telluride Film Festival.
Is it a good or a bad omen?

>>87393697
Hackers
Good Shepher
that missing kid movie that stood in for her menopausal phase

Now show me your vulva

>>87393714
so it wasn't real socialism, which means /pol/ btfo again.

>>87392976
>Also, what are some good documentaries on the Khmer Rouge? And what are other good documentaries about the rise of communism in general? I remember I once saw one on BBC about China and the cultural revolution. It was pretty long but interesting as fuck. If only I could remember the name.
The Red Khmers dindu nuffin.
t. Noam Chomsky

>>87393746
Lol I want to guess your age then, 19? You just looked these up on Google, didn't you?

>>87393759
It was something pretty uniquely bizarre. I always feel uneasy reading about that regime.

>>87393769
He apologized for that.

>>87393726
Are we in the hobby of celebrating moderately intelligent gook movies from a stepmother of a gook?

>>87393799
>>>/pol/

>>87393799
I was talking about By the Sea.

>>87391983
That film that she directed was fucking abysmal. I timed it and the end is 9.5 minutes of a guy holding a log.

>>87393777
Is that it? Where's your blog about your vagina lol?

>>87393799
jesus christ just go the fuck away. you always ruin everything because you just have to make yourself look better. Even if you did, you come off as retarded and simply annoying.
please go do something to prove you're good at it and leave this board alone.

>>87393820
And we were talking about your judgement and how they can be perceived as banal and too angelina jolie.

>>87393832
>acting like a dumb /pol/faggot sperging about gooks
>it's everyone else that is the problem for bringing up how he's such a faggot.

>>87393834
I have no clue what you are on about, I don't read Jolie's blogs.

>>87393853
what were you expecting when you posted your vanity gook movie here gookflix?

>>87393858
OK, but I never said anything about judging First They Killed My Father. All I said was that By the Sea was fairly intelligent for something out of Hollywood.

File: own_nothing.jpg (29KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x480px

>>87393223
>>87393248
>mega-triggered by a basic display of reality
most odd

>>87393891
>gook gook gook gook
>>>/pol/

>>87393890
You don't much idea about anything apparently.

>>87393891
Mods doing their job and banning all discussions about things that aren't movies.

>>87393914
Yes, I must be disconnected from reality. That's it...

File: 71AFxO29jBL._AA1073_.jpg (553KB, 753x1073px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 753x1073px

>>87393714

Technically he didn't explicitly set out to kill them all.

>>87393759

Bizarrely, the Khmer Rouge is /pol/'s version of socialism/leftrist incarnate. It's all of their conspiracy theories come true - with the race component not included. The Khmer Rouge were really into the Marxist aspects that entrance SJW's at the moment - They were very much into the Maoist style stuff. More Marxist than Communist, more concerned with a complete civlizational overhaul, rather than an economic one.

Imagine if the college kids you see running around screeching about White Privilege and and practicing progressive stacks managed to actually compile a genuine military and large public support.

>>87393769
>>87393779

Not a documentary, but there was a based on fact Japanese movie called United Red Army that's really amazing and intense covering Japanese students brief fliration with East Asian communism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8AGDBg-r3g&t=122s

>>87393921
>triggered triggered muh fragile mentality triggered
>>>/r/eddit

>>87393926
At least I can write a coherent sentence.

File: 1493287705839.jpg (38KB, 486x427px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 486x427px

>>87391983
uh oh spaghettio that film is LIBRUL litrully unwatchable. superor minds don't need their believes challenged

>>87393899
You were analogising one of Jolie's flicks that you knew with another one that you didn't. Even at that you failed.

>>87393964
Yawn.

File: 1504110701779.jpg (208KB, 674x675px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 674x675px

>>87393891
>>87393964
>jajajaja ay despacito cabron fuck niggers and gooks but Brazil is based-o amirite fellow 'pedes
For the last time, stop trying to suck my white dick José. I'm not going to appoint you honorary white. It's not going to happen.

>>87394037
Where did I use analogy at all? I really think you ought to study English more, you seem to not know the meanings of certain words like "reasonably" and "analogy".

>>87393956
Kino Lorber films are unironically kino. Too bad copies are often hard to find

>>87394064
You have a middle-schooler's grasp of the language, and your default reaction is to always claim to ignorance. What an absolute shitfest you've made out of this thread.

File: 1495066932841.jpg (67KB, 673x500px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 673x500px

>>87393956
>unironically equating liberal college kids with the Khmer fucking Rouge

>>87394115
Point me to the post I wrote where I supposedly used this analogy.

>>87394056
?
gook is fishing
tell me when you catch one gookie

>>87394115
>You have a middle-schooler's grasp of the language, and your default reaction is to always claim to ignorance.
>claim to ignorance
nah he's right, you don't know English.

File: 1497993073666.jpg (50KB, 678x569px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 678x569px

>>87394150
Whatever you say roachie.

>>87394140
>>87394164
>middle schooler thinks analogising only means using like and metaphors
just like angelina jolie's reasonableness

>>87394197
Point me to the post I wrote where I supposedly used this analogy.

>>87394137

That's precisely my point.

Liberal college kids are impotent and will grow up to """radical centrists""" like everyone else.

The Khmer Rouge is what happens if everything goes wrong in your society (like Americans meddling in your shit) and somehow they end up in charge.

>>87394197
I think you have legit mental illness, son

>>87394167
fishie fishie trigger fishie gookie

>>87394207
>Liberal college kids are impotent and will grow up to """radical centrists""" like everyone else.
This is your brain on /pol/, Jesus fucking Christ you sre disconnected.

>>87394207
Point me to a period in history where liberal college kids did not stop republicans from enabling atrocities in the name of liberalization.

>>87394205
Holy shit you weren't even aware of what you were doing? Suck in air mouthbreather.

>>87394282

Really? What makes you think Millenials will be any different from Boomers or Gen X?

If you think their fringe/extremist ideals will continue with them into middle age, I'd say you're disconnected.

>>87394288

Your post is nonsesical.

>>87394282
You gonna hook me up on your hippy drugs now

>>87394331
>being liberal is "fringe or extremist"
You literally live in some bizzaro universe, kiddo.

>>87394331
Who is it you're trying to convince when you can only seem to argue with yourself?

>>87394331
>everyone will grow up conservative like me and my uncle.

>>87394360

Just wait until you graduate High School and find out the majority of Western Civilization isn't into Anarcho-Communism and extremist identity politics, friendo.

>being liberal

That's your description. I'm going with your (incorrect) terminology.

>>87391983
not enough americans know about this, it looks competent enough so i'm sure it'll be a worthwhile watch for a number of reasons, even if it has as many issues as beasts of no nation

>>87394398
>Anarcho-Communist means "being liberal".
Are you larping to annoy me with your autism here?

>>87394382

Nonsensical posting.

>>87394397

>My generation is different. I'm unique. We'll be the ones that break the mold!

Sure you will anon. You're as delusional as the Hitler worshippers over at /pol/.

>>87394398
>That's your description. I'm going with your (incorrect) terminology.
Nobody has any clue what you are fucking on about, mate.

>>87394414
whoa what will they do when they start to know?

>>87394421

>I keep trying to get people to use the wrong terminology so I can argue against a strawman

For what purpose?

Again - YOU incorrectly referred to Leftists as "Liberal" >>87394137

>>87391983
Oscar bait at best. So a shit movie aiming for muh oscar nominations.

>>87394445

It's not my fault you're too stupid to keep up anon.

>>87394478
>Netflix
>Oscar bait

Oscars hate Netflix.

>decide to make a thread about something that peaked my interest recently
>threads where I seek good conversation usually get 4 or 5 replies over an hour and then die
>put a yank political buzzword in relevant to Hollywood types
>thread explodes
I don't know if its more funny or sad that it really is that easy

File: where is her right feet going.jpg (956KB, 1200x1568px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 1200x1568px

I'd like to have secks with her.

>>87394478
>Oscars
>for a Netflix flick
Good luck

>>87394438
So when the words don't follow the rehearsed flow of call and answer you've been accustomed to, your only response is to shut down? What a shitty so-called forum for the free exchange of opinions. Five years from now all your proselytizing will be automated. If your opinions can be posted by bots, are you also a bot?

>>87394438
What are you trying to say? You realize that I'm baffled, right? Are you saying that being left-leaning in some way, is a fucking phase for High School kids?

>>87394474
I didn't post that, Sherlock.

>>87394521
it's piqued you tryhard gook. would of loosed it to.

>>87393021
What does this even fucking have to do with the movie? Holy shit.

>>87394545

I'm not shutting down. YOU inccorectly used the term "liberal", and then proceeded to argue that my points about leftists don't apply to liberals - something I never said. It's called a Strawman. You invented an unrelated point to argue against.

Why, I don't know, since we weren't even having an argument or discussion.

>bots
>automation
>free exchange forum

....okay then...

>>87394521
>I deliberately made /pol/ bait and somehow think that was okay.
You're the problem.

>>87394586
So what? Defend it you faggot. You're responding from it.

>>87392421
anything by netflix. which makes this doubly soulless.

>>87394496
I think you are confused.

>>87394612
>defend something you didn't post or say
What is literally wrong with your brain?

>>87394570

I'm saying that extreme leftist politics are popular among a sizeable number of college aged kids, and that as they get older they will drift more towards the center. I'm saying this has happened repeatedly throughout history - That people hold more radical opinions when they are young, and become more moderate with age.

>>87394586

So then the person who DID post that is who you have an issue with, not me. They are the one who used the term "liberal" when talking about leftists.

>>87394598
would you say i was being more liberal with its usage than what you were spergily accustomed to?

>>87394655

>defend something you didn't post or say

But you are defending it...?

>>87394627

Definitely not my confused face anon.

>>87394655
You faggoting out now when you've posted so much that means nothing? What's one more post of your meaningless shit?

>>87394696
I think I am talking to a legitamate autist...

>>87394668

Judging by the proceeding conversation, you were being very specifically incorrect about it. Not liberal at all.

>>87394713

Which one is the autist? Me or the guy you just responded to?

Both of us are autistic perhaps?

Maybe you're just easily confused?

>>87394717
I judge you were not equipped at all to form an adequate and timely response to it so you argue from exception like most of you do. I don't give a fuck.

>>87394526
>lolnotits
>Mrs Skellington
>Will lecture you on the superiority of women all the way through any interaction
why

>>87394735
What's the difference? You are all still posting in angelina jolie thread. None of your opinions are valid.

>>87394751

Your post is nonsensical and it seems you have a persecution complex.

>most of you

Australians?

>argue

No one was arguing. You just sperged out because you seem to think "they" are out to get you.

>>87392444
trips and film festival ovation confirm its pretentious bullshit

>>87394777

Nice trips. What's wrong with Angelina Jolie?

The movie looks decent, Unbroken was watchable and she used to be hot.

>>87394790
You were talking about strawmanning earlier, is this your impression of it? Inadequate once again. What narcotics are you even on?

>>87392067
She's apparently shaping up a pretty decent director. It wouldn't be the first time for an actor to turn out a solid director, or is Eastwood considered bad these days?

>>87394751

>Talking about a very specific, identifiable group of people with well documented, clarified beliefs

>argue from exception

I don't think you should use terms you don't understand anon. For future reference.

Also Netflix is going to rule the world and there is nothing you can do about it.

>>87394760
>Will lecture you on the superiority of women all the way through any interaction
This projection.

>>87393741
Maybe they give ovations ironically for bad movies. I assume they are hipsters.

>>87394858
Will you just shut the fuck up already?

>>87394812
She doesn't look decent, nobody I knew watched unbroken and heroin chic was never sexy.

>>87394875
Or maybe the film was good, you bitter faggot?

>its a r.eddit ruins another thread episode
listen leftist, /pol//tv/ is a right wing safe space

>>87394840

>strawmanning

I didn't make an argument nor attempt to refute an argument.

>What narcotics are you even on

Low dose of Tramadol.

>>87394886
I am clearly holding the moral high ground and you can only attempt to silence me to erase your inability to clearly define the terms of the debate.

>>87394912
No.

>>87394454
be better informed about potential foreign policy steps and missteps? you're literally shitposting to defend being ignorant of human history. pretty untermensch desu

>>87394925
Sure...

>>87393956
>with the race component not included.

Lol wut? The Khmer Rouge were Ethno-Nationalist, they largely targeted the large Chinese and Vietnamese minorities in the country. It's one of the reasons China and Vietnam turned against them so quickly while the US, UK and Australia backed Pol Pot.

>>87394886

Will you leave threads you don't have any interest in participating in so as not to derail them?

No?

There's your answer.

>>87394891

I said the movie looks decent. The anecdotal viewing habits of your immediate family and friends isn't important and Jolie was the sexist woman alive for a few years.

>>87394944
Are you in any position to make a step or misstep? You have a liberal's fantasy of why studios produce movies.

>>87394912

There isn't even any /pol/ here for reddit to get mad at, which is why the thread is fizzling out and nonsensical.

>>87394962

Right - but that's ethnic, not racial...(right?)

Like when the Indonesians went full chimpout on the Chinese in Indonesia...that's more sectarian or nationalist violence, not racial because they're all Asian (I think?)

>>87394982
I can't respect anyone lacking this much of lateral perspective. Their views on film will always be centered on themselves.

>>87395021
Shut the fuck up ignorant shitlib

>>87394944

>be better informed about potential foreign policy

I mean, we already had one Oscar winning movie and countless documentaries and pulitzer prize winning articles about the Cambodian genocide and the U.S. role in it.

We saw repeats with Iraq - and this didn't stop anyone from championing the same approach in Libya or Syria.

We've all seen the utter failure of Marxism in full color on live TV - we're still talking about implementing it again.

I don't think anyone will watch this movie and think;

>Maybe we shouldn't support bad guys as long as they promise to initially only kill other bad guys

>The amount of eggs you need to break to make a Communism omlette is pretty high and maybe we shouldn't try it for the umpteenth time

They'll just be like;

>Awwww. That poor little girl's dad died. So sad :(

>>87391983
i bet jolie is gonna fuck her adopted chink son.

>>87395061

You're opinions on a film are informed by the lack of viewership of related movies by people you claim to know. That's an indication of extremely subjective viewing, centered on the self.

>>87395097

Make me.

>>87395164
>gonna

>>87393268
Liberals still have nothing to do with leftists in the US, especially if you're talking about socialists. Liberals are generally centrists and social democrats at best. Socialists bash liberals more than conservatives do.

>>87395171
You're judgement on Jolie's gook movie is based on fucking Unbroken fullstop. Nothing you say can be taken seriously and you're as much a slave to the submit button as a bot instructed to respond. Realize you've been trying so hard to prove you are on reddit all this time.

>>87395126

I think OCD and autism is more specific to Right Wingers.

Right Wingers are hardwired to fear foreign population groups to prevent bacterial infections. As a result they are overly cautious, and obsessed with hygiene, organization and structure - This leads to OCD and spergy style behavior.

Liberals are more open, less concerned with security and planning and free form. More sociable and emphatic. This lack of OCD autism means they don't need facts - they like emotive and social persuasion - it's why they are fond of reddit - the upvote/downvote feature and intense moderation (and distinction between sequential posting or posts ordered by popularity) is very much catered to their tastes.

It's why autistic OCD right wingers like 4chan - it's the opposite, plus insanely repetitive.

>original theory, do not steal.

>The correlation rate between autism, liberal and redditor is astounding. What explains this phenomenon?
Someone belonging to all three categories was triggered so much by this he was compelled to report it.

>>87395245

It's based on Unbroken, the trailer, the subject matter.

>Basing an opinion on an upcoming film on a previous movie by the director

>reddit
>bots

You need to stop thinking everyone is combative. You need to be less hostile. No one likes people who are defiantly contrarian.

>movie made by some dumbass actor that failed college
oh yes i bet it wil be great

>>87395298
Why would you expect any interest on a gook remake and why are you so hostile about judgements on a Jolie movie?

File: 1496652156187.jpg (23KB, 230x244px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 230x244px

>>87392002
My first thought as well

>>87395298
Who are you trying to convince, faggot? It sounds like you're trying to make 4chan like you more. The fucking delusion it takes to even pose that.

>>87395341

I'm not expecting any interest on this movie.

What "gook remake" are you talking about?

I'm not hostile abut judgements on a Jolie movie. I'm trying to be friendly and accomodating.

>>87395407
For what?

>>87395392

What's wrong with trying to make friends?

>>87395417

A stranger is just a friend you haven't met yet.

>>87395427
>>87395453
Do they send you hotpockets when you are in dire need? What's wrong with not letting needy friendseeking attitudes get in the way of honest exchanges of opinions?

>>87395475

You can have both.

There's literally nothing wrong with being needy. If you aren't, how else will people know you are in need?

>>87395541
Sounds like you're psyching yourself up to a life of cocksucking. So it follows all of your opinions will be of the cocksucking kind. This Angelina Jolie semen slurping attitude just isn't for me.

>>87395603

There's literally nothing wrong with cocksucking anon.

>>87391983
I'd love it, if the movie would end with a fade to black and a text that says:
After these children were free'd I adopted all of them. t. Angie Jolie

>>87394331
>What makes you think Millenials will be any different from Boomers or Gen X?
"What makes you think generations will be different from each other"

Wow anon very insightful wtf I shill for based conservatism now. All Gen Xers vote republican, source: my ass

File: 1418328781397.jpg (9KB, 298x212px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 298x212px

>>87393105
> because most of eus government is openly liberal and pro-socialist.
Fucking burger education

>>87395245
How many times can you say gook? Do you have a quota?

>>87395841
No you must be right, look at all tbosr successful far-right, firebrand candidates that are just sweeping Europe...

>>87395752
>adoption is bad now

File: 1471737958603.gif (728KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 250x250px

>>87393956
>unironically equating leftist college kids with the Khmer fucking Rouge

>Netlfix

I think you know your answer already

>>87392002
This. Also, FPBP.

>>87395952
So, it will probably be great and get Emmy noms?

>>87395814

>I'M DIFFERENT! I'M NOT GOING TO BE LIKE MY PARENTS!

lol, okay anon. Keep on telling yourself that. Have you had your gay phase yet?

>>87395850
You're really trying to find and make friends through your shared love of Angelina Jolie and gook pets of the american liberal establishment? Only losers do that on gookchan.

>>87395977
>gays are just going through a phase
Jesus Christ, man. You need to be baiting.

File: Mike.jpg (55KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 512x512px

>>87395941

>Equating leftists with leftists

File: 1451435471150.png (56KB, 920x1090px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 920x1090px

>>87395908
Or look at all the EU members with conservative governments right now.

>>87392444
>Americlaps

>>87395987
What are you on about? Are you a schizo?

>>87396032
t. Angie gook tooker Jolie

>>87396015
Lol so, 1? You do realize that nearly every far right party has been soundly defeated in every country they spring up like AIDS, right?

File: 1315971026058.jpg (33KB, 368x368px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 368x368px

>>87396009
>Khmer Rouge is American Neo-Leftism
Tbqhwu we are in dire need of another war to purge uneducated spicshits such as yourself from the gene pool.

>>87396057
>gook gook gook gook gook gook

>>87396015
>a-a-any day now! r-r-right?

File: nervous.jpg (20KB, 226x186px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 226x186px

>>87393940
The image is true, anyone can look at the references. Yet you are freaking out. Why?

Why is this such an (attempted) kept secret?

>>87396067
>Lol so, 1?
10. The blue ones.
>every far right party has been soundly defeated
More people than ever voted FN and AfD is about to enter a parliament that is notoriously hard to get into as 3d largest party and with flying fucking colors. And social conservative hardliners are surging in Poland, no? I really don't think we're through this wave of nationalism just yet. Maybe after UK economy goes to shit in a decade or so...

>>87396139
Yes, the obeselords were beaten by them so now they have to make movies about them and adopt their gook grandchildren.

>>87396015
Really makes you think, how conservative parties are always at the peak of popularity during an economic or social crisis before fizzling out for another 5 to 10 years...

>>87396225
>conservative parties are always at the peak of popularity during an economic or social crisis
Don't know where you're getting that from, Merkel's years have been pure Biedermeier for Germany.

>>87396193
>10. The blue ones
I don't know where you got this chart fron, but literally almost all of these are not considered "conservative" majority parties in government.
>And social conservative hardliners are surging in Poland, no?
No. Not really.
>I really don't think we're through this wave of nationalism just yet
It's already fizzling out in much of the UK, in countries that matter.
>Maybe after UK economy goes to shit in a decade or so...
They can't negotiate a soft Brexit, it's onna be much sooner than that.

>>87396266
Are you calling Merkel a conservative?

Europe is irrelevant and will just be a dumping ground of cheap goods from the manufacturing bases in central and east Asia. No wonder hollywood is paying their obeisance early. What are you doing to earn your place this century yuros?

>>87396015
>>87396291
>I don't know where you got this chart fron, but literally almost all of these are not considered "conservative" majority parties in government.
Should've posted source:
theguardian(.)com/world/datablog/2015/jun/22/third-eu-governed-by-centre-left-data

>>87396329
You are an imbecile.

>>87396073

You're doing the strawman thing again anon. In case you didn't realize.

>>87396329
You can be for open immigration while still being Christian conservative in virtually every other field anon.

>>87396400
So, is that a yes?

>>87391983
>Will it be genuinely insightful

>a film by a woman

Nah.

>>87396413
Conservative doesn't mean "I like Jesus", it's just a trend that conservatives happen to be religious because it goes with the territory. In terms of conservative policy, Merkel isn't really that conservative. It seems silly to try and "claim" her for them.

>>87391983
Angelina Jolie has said that she doesn't like her (biological) white son because he's "too privileged", and that she prefers her adopted African children. That's the mindset of the person directing this. What do you think it's going to be like?

File: 1284156570154.jpg (38KB, 945x835px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 945x835px

>>87396329
Show me where Merkel leans left on anything but the refugee thing.

Too gooky for me

>>87396489
That doesn't just magically make her policies conservative, anon.

>>87396371
So, that graph is nowhere to be seen in this article, and it doesn't say that all the countries you mentioned are conservative, only that there are less "center left" majority government's than before, that won elections. I was talking about far-right firebrands, who mostly lose elections.

>>87396552
You have nothing on Merkel and can only resort to acting like a girl

>>87396600
>"y-y-you a girl! Ha! Got em"
Again, politics is a bit more complicated than your goofy, cartoon brain can handle. Given her party's platform, it's not really honest to try and claim that she's some conservative representative when on social policy, for years, she has leaned left.

>>87396597
Oh, the graph just didn't load for me...my bad.

File: 1201415345443.jpg (465KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1000x1000px

>>87396539
It's time to stop.

>>87396696
Doesn't your dad ever get sick of your excuses?

File: fdshjzhgf.png (170KB, 394x832px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 394x832px

>>87396597
>>87396696
damn I was expecting some 2spooky4u webdemon fuckery and was ready to post this screenshot

>>87396731
Are you having problems? Is gookanon giving your rump a raw time?

>>87396780
>gook gook gook gook gook gook gook gook gook gook gook

File: 1501767723947.jpg (139KB, 1023x682px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1023x682px

>>87396780
he really flusters my butt

>>87396816
>habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi habibi

>>87396867
>spic spic spic spic spic spic spic spic spic spic spic spic

File: 1502740833529.jpg (294KB, 949x1118px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 949x1118px

>>87396816
>>87396867
>>87396909
/tv/ - Television & Film

>>87396932
>scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie scalie
egg shitting queer